From Snuson Forum
Joined: 21 Jun 2008
Posts: 1408
Location: South Carolina USA
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 4:58 am Post subject: I just got finished reading through the entire PACT act bill in its final form.
The key to understanding the bill is definition section of the bill. The restrictions concern sales "into a state" which is clearly defied as interstate commerce between states or tribal nations. The bill says nothing about legal international commerce operating under already existing laws/treaties
The Second key is the reconciliation section where the bill seeks to reconcile its requirements with other existing laws. This section says nothing by way of amendment or qualification concerning existing international trade and tobacco laws.
In short there is nothing in this bill that even addresses legal international sales. Period. The end.
Here is my take from a different thread
Snusdog wrote: Did you notice what was missing?
There is no mention of legitimate foreign companies selling to USA consumers. The wording of the entire law assumes interstate commerce. This is a USA directed law. I see absolutely nothing in it that even remotely concerns foreign companies operating legally with in already existing trade agreements with the USA.
The language of this law would have to rescind existing international tobacco trade laws or further qualify them (and Im not even sure a domestic bill can do that without several other measures and steps).
Our suppliers dont need to do anything more than what they are doing
THIS IS A BILL DIRECTED AT DOMESTIC COMPANIES AND SELLERS ONLY
IT SAYS NOTHING ABOUT FORIGN TRADE NOR CAN IT BE CONSTRUED TO DO SO OR BE LEGALLY APPLIED TO SUCH.
THIS IS GOOD NEWS
dog
If this take is accurate and international law overrides the PACT Act, it might be easier to buy internationally. Of course, you still could be subject to the taxes, but you always have been. It's just that customs hasn't gotten the information into a channel that filtered them back to you. Anyway, an interesting conversation going on in this thread.