Petition the administration to recognize e-cigarettes

Status
Not open for further replies.

tybin

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 17, 2010
31,651
16,503
WA
go ecf
Stickman2.gif
go ecf
Stickman2.gif
 

Stubby

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 22, 2009
2,107
1,995
Madison, WI USA
I totally agree DC and any wasted time in getting there just gives our opponents more motive to step on us. I read the comment in this thread-

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...ette-forum-discussion-thread.html#post4216444

about signing the petition, "I'll pass this go around.

I think the text was poorly worded and cannot, in good faith, put my name to it."

When we worry about the wording in our plea rather than making it, we are just losing time.

I did sign but reluctantly as I agree in that the petition is poorly worded. I would go farther and say it is poorly conceived. Besides having the idea of job creation is a bit off the wall.

I would much rather see a inclusive petition calling for the administration to recognize tobacco Harm Reduction as a legitimate approach to the issue of tobacco. We can start by the government telling the truth about the relative harm of different tobacco products as opposed to the misleading information we are getting today. Tobacco Harm Reduction has the potential of saving millions of lives from an early death and can save billions in health care, plus tobacco users have a right to know the truth so they can make rational choices for themselves. That's a basic human right that is being denied.

The basic idea of a petition is good, but I would vote for scraping this one and starting over with something better thought out.
 
Last edited:

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,297
7,724
Green Lane, Pa
I did sign but reluctantly as I agree in that the petition is poorly worded. I would go farther and say it is poorly conceived. Besides having the idea of job creation as a bit off the wall.

I would much rather see a inclusive petition calling for the administration to recognize Tobacco Harm Reduction as a legitimate approach to the issue of tobacco. We can start by the government telling the truth about the relative harm of different tobacco products as opposed to the misleading information we are getting today. Tobacco Harm Reduction has the potential of saving millions of lives from an early death and can save billions in health care, but that's really secondary to the fact that tobacco users have a right to know the truth so they can make rational choices for themselves. That's a basic human right that is being denied.

The basic idea of a petition is good, but I would vote for scraping this one and starting over with something better thought out.

I'd totally agree Stubby, but it was the only one available and I'll support anything that brings the topic into the White House. There would also be additional support available from other smokeless users.
 

Stubby

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 22, 2009
2,107
1,995
Madison, WI USA
I'd totally agree Stubby, but it was the only one available and I'll support anything that brings the topic into the White House. There would also be additional support available from other smokeless users.
That of course is the other point. I would like to bring up this idea at the snus forum and Tobacco Harm Reduction blog but would be reluctant as it is now. A more inclusive approach may have a better chance of success with more widespread appeal. Of course having said that the snus folks are not the most politically active bunch but perhaps with a bit of persuasion we could pick up a few signatures. Even the likes of Larry Waters and Brad Rodu might get involved.
 

Sophey

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2011
183
103
Seattle, WA
As of today, only 1347 people have opposed S. 1403. (I'm surprised that number isn't much higher.) This leads me to think getting 5,000 names on the White House petition by Oct. 27th may not happen. If nothing else, these platforms present us with ways to make our presence known -- which is a crucial step to being taken seriously. It's possible though that people are just too accustomed to having their voices ignored in today's political climate to bother signing either. I hope that isn't the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread