Hey. I don't want to hear it. I know you guys like to read. Tut! Tut! Tut!
Well, you already have my vote. They are eligible for the GP if they are eligible for the monthly.
If we go with the above, what are the consequences, if any?
(Sorry so late, working... have been reading as time allows.)
@CES beautiful job on summary. I'm still absorbing.

@Tom Love the dog!

@Whis, Tibs, Atty, Morri ::waving::
IDK that answer. I just voted monthly = G.P. so as to not impact past stuff, like Tibby said.
(This is a bit out of logical order due to my reading back).
JJ has an interesting point about making it open to all 2012 turnees and participating in PVT gets an ADDITIONAL bonus entry. See post #1755. I still don't know how you verify turning in 2012 though JJ (see more below).
I actually don't care much. I just have no way of determining if someone turns in 2012 or not due to the "being logged out issue" or the "# posts issue". So tying it to the welcome thread verification process (in my mind, at this go-around of discussions) keeps it consistent with what has been done so far (I think). Wow. Lots of disclaimers since I'm not really "into" the contest stuff. I bowed out and started to ignore it.
However, if we get rid of the PVT tie in, it doesn't matter to us. In fact, it may not matter anyway. Just because the PVT has requirements for a welcome thread party participation, doesn't mean that the contest
has to. They could use some other mechanic for entry, or just accept different "types" of welcome threads than we do.
The consensus seems to be to get them to show up in PVT before they turn, and use the contest as a carrot-on-a-stick to get them there so they can find out about it. Tibby and whis, at minimum, seem to be worried that if we don't have another carrot via the G.P. entry, we'll get few avatar parties.
Also, we did tell some people "Sorry, but you're already a vet (we don't throw a PVT party). Congrats anyway." We do post in people's "Hey I'm a vet, Cool!" threads out of polite conversation and in the spirit of supporting accomplishments just like some of us may post in "Hey I've been smoke free for a month" posts elsewhere. But none of those things are PRE-vet Thread things IMO.
Pre-Vet means
PRE-Vet to me.
I'm guessing there's less impact to what we have done already, but just as many sour-grapes.
Let's try for a "sour-grapes list" for fun:
A) I was a veteran before 2012 and we never had a contest. Boo-hoo.

B) I was a veteran this year but ignored the whole contest thing and the pre-vet thread. Even though it was posted in the contest area and was a sticky and is now floating at the top of General all the time. Now I'm too late. Boo-hoo.

C) I haven't been on ECF forever and I just logged in at 24 past the hour. I turned vet 60 seconds ago, even though I joined 2 years ago. Really. Sure I did. Reeeallllly. I'm posting my entry, even tho I snoozed. Boo-hoo.

D) Wow. Look at that. I've been on ECF for 3 years and know how the forum works. I don't post much, but I can read. Now I have 80 posts and it says I'm a vet. I know I've been on here for 3 years, and didn't use any of my posts this year to ask to be in the contest BEFORE I turned, so I'm asking now. Please? See...I said "Please" so that makes it OK, right? Boo-hoo.

E) I didn't get a personal engraved invitation to a publicly posted thing. So I want in now. Boo-hoo.
I seem to remember that the 1st month of the contest was very open due to the timing. Those that predated the contest (Jan 1 -> Jan start-of-contest-ish time) got a break. I suppose another consideration is:
F) I turned vet in early Jan, but didn't participate in PVT. I would have if I had know there was going to be a contest, but it wasn't announced yet. Is it too late?
I don't remember exactly how that worked, but that type of grievance could be handled on a case by case basis if applicable. Did I miss any?
I know that the above sour-grapes list comes off badly. I truly feel sorry if someone missed out. But...whatayagonnado? One other option is to leave it open to all people that turn in 2012. Or you could even leave it open to all veterans no matter how "old". However, that's more of a contest purpose/creation issue. And not my issue. Verification is not my problem, but I think that having the vet show up before they turn prevents some possible fraud (not that any ECF'ers would actually do that or anything

)
I don't want PVT to go "hasta la bye-bye" due to lack of participation. Neither do I want a nightmare for others to have to administer, nor "bad blood" about turning times. And the whole "being there" thing cause problems, rescheduled or not. So it will have to survive on it's own merits. We can dangle a carrot to get them there, but we need to sell it after that. So I'd keep the G.P. requirements the same as monthly...even if participation declines. I'm open to the "All 2012 vets & PVT participation = bonus entry" thing too. Carrot = carrot.
2 cents.
(clicks save...BAM! Read to your heart's content... or not).