ok - no idea why i decided to go through all of this one more time but it seemed necessary, lol
and here are the highlights
this ^^^ to me, is a clear indicator we should only concern ourselves with getting through the rest of the year and still have fun with it. unfortunately, we were under the wrong impression for the first 6 month of how this was supposed to have worked. no vote was ever taken.
marking the threads had been instituted by jj all along and is beyond our scope. a thread title can be edited for only a few minutes - verified by classy and my own experience.
it seems that jj is in favor of us to, at the least, include a request for sponsoring vets and/or their prevets to stop by pvt and inform us of their intentions
^^^^^^^^ this i pulled just for my tweety as a friendly reminder!
tweety, if you'll forget again i come after you with a frying pan.
i'm hoping the above we'll help us concentrate on what is best for pvt and not worry our heads about what might or might not happen in the future. our main goal should be the tweaking of existing rules where we can get back to the fun part of pvt .....
and here are the highlights
I'm trying to keep my input on this on low.
Just keep in mind, when next year comes up, I will be more involved. In fact once we (you) get what you want for this one, I will start a thread in the Library Annex to get this started. And yes, like Whiskey, I have changed my mind but only about the contest. Get through the changes first before this proceeds and even then we will have plenty of time to discuss the how-to of PreVets.
Please keep your voices down to a whisper because, after all, you'll be in a library.![]()
this ^^^ to me, is a clear indicator we should only concern ourselves with getting through the rest of the year and still have fun with it. unfortunately, we were under the wrong impression for the first 6 month of how this was supposed to have worked. no vote was ever taken.
Another problem I'd like to see a solution for once this is set.
Going in and marking those threads is irritating. For me for having to do and to others because they have to look at them.
If you make a mistake, then you have time (two days I think), to go back and change it. If it runs later then tell me what change is needed and I'll take care of it.
Thank you.![]()
marking the threads had been instituted by jj all along and is beyond our scope. a thread title can be edited for only a few minutes - verified by classy and my own experience.
I check those several times a day. The outside of PVT were opened in plenty of time for me to check the members profile.
Basically adding more rules is why this wasn't publicized. It's a good one since it picks up people who don't want a lot of hoopla.
Option here that gives me plenty of time: Stipulate the thread has to be open 3 -5 days before the join date?
it seems that jj is in favor of us to, at the least, include a request for sponsoring vets and/or their prevets to stop by pvt and inform us of their intentions
I agree. Let's not change more than is absolutely necessary--for the remainder of the year. Next year, if there is a contest, we can start from scratch based on our experience this year.![]()
^^^^^^^^ this i pulled just for my tweety as a friendly reminder!
i'm hoping the above we'll help us concentrate on what is best for pvt and not worry our heads about what might or might not happen in the future. our main goal should be the tweaking of existing rules where we can get back to the fun part of pvt .....