I'm more of a tube guy or maybe a nice tesseract. Nice off-ramp sign. You must be from SoCal.Get back in your box and quit thinking outside of it!
I'm more of a tube guy or maybe a nice tesseract. Nice off-ramp sign. You must be from SoCal.Get back in your box and quit thinking outside of it!
Does anyone know, with any data backing, that clones have, in fact, hurt the market for originals? You have two options:
1. Clones steal market share from the originals, harming businesses.
2. Clones create market share for the originals by creating demand for the product.
Has the use of mods/rdas/rbas risen over the last few years?
If it has, how much of it is due to the availability of clones?
If it has, are clone makers the only ones to benefit, or are purchases of originals rising as well?
There's such passion on all sides whenever clones come up, but the passion is based on belief, not data. Where is the data?
All of those are options. Without data, however, we don't know. My personal story is that had all mech mods been $200, then I probably would have dismissed mech mods, and bought an mvp. Now that I have two clones, I might (huge might!) buy an original one of these days.
How many people who started off with clones move on to an original? How many people who own an original go on to buy clones instead of another original? How many people who now own an original decided on a mech mod because the product itself was popular: someone recommended it to them, or they read about it here, etc.?
I don't think the clone/original markets are two completely separate things; it's all a guess without data, however.
I buy both, though I have never purchased a clone of an original that I own, nor have I purchased an original of a clone that I own. That said, I would likely purchase an original Tree of Life if I could get one. Except that I can't. I guess it's a good thing that the clone is virtually identical to the original in every way (I have examined both the clone and the original down to the very last piece), except that the clone includes an 18650 tube, and the with the original an 18650 tube is a supplementary purchase AFTER the initial $190 for the original package which only includes 18350 and 18500 tubes.
I was wondering about that, as I was looking into tube format copper mods. There's a mod called "Anatolian," which appeals to me as I grew up in Istanbul.
idk if I'll buy it, but without clones, I wouldn't have gotten into the product enough to discover the Nemesis, much less the Anatolian.
I'm more of a tube guy or maybe a nice tesseract. Nice off-ramp sign. You must be from SoCal.
There's such passion on all sides whenever clones come up, but the passion is based on belief, not data. Where is the data?
OEM's are playing more and more games with limited editions, exclusives, minimum advertised prices, and making customers jump through hoops to even get ahold of one of their pieces. Also, prices are only getting higher and higher. If they were hurting from the clones, they would be in a race to the bottom in terms of pricing.
This is the golden era of our hobby, enjoy it.
I am one that only buys originals..other than my Russian 91%, which I think forced Kayfun to improve, and has excellent quality.
However, I don't try to force my opinion on anyone one way or the other, but I do like to see people that buy clones at least admit what they are doing...buying a counterfeit.
In reality, for most in the west, the price of an original clone can be rather easily managed.
Especially when you take into account how much you spent smoking.
Throw in the fact that this hobby is one of the few that most can afford the top end equipment, well, why not buy originals?
There is something to be said for holding and using something that is hard to find, good quality, and beautiful as well.....and you have avoided any possible moral implications![]()
There's no empirical data either. Imperial data must be data from Great Britain. I'm sorry, I know that's a cheap shot, but I just couldn't help myself.There is no imperial data to be had.
Tubb, you have express you lack of that particular moral stance many times.
I said nothing about yours....why bring up my morals?
And many seem to agree with me, as the prices of originals are holding up well.
If the mod that is being copied has somewhere on it the label of "clone" or "reproduction" that is fine. Just like a reproduction of a painting.
However, most don't. Some even copy serial numbers...and that is counterfeiting. The act of openly selling them doesn't change that.
You aren't even interested in debate, you just want to push your point of view, so...enjoy your vape, and peace![]()
However, most don't. Some even copy serial numbers...and that is counterfeiting. The act of openly selling them doesn't change that.
There's no empirical data either. Imperial data must be data from Great Britain. I'm sorry, I know that's a cheap shot, but I just couldn't help myself.![]()
To the OP:
As for quality of clones, I can't personally say.
BUT
I can personally say that many of the posters talking about how great clones are, are on other threads talking about how they fixed problems such as crunchy buttons.
I can also personally say that I've yet to have a problem out of my originals. There are originals with problems, however. Just research carefully.
And good luck whichever way you decide![]()
To the OP:
As for quality of clones, I can't personally say.
BUT
I can personally say that many of the posters talking about how great clones are, are on other threads talking about how they fixed problems such as crunchy buttons.
Many (i'd say 70%) of the crunchy button complaints having been coming in from stingray clones, the original suffers from the same condition/issue.
It's acceptable (and easily fixed) on a $30 clone, its not acceptable on a $200 original.