Hello everyone at ECF
I would like to share my frustrations with a forum member who's been constantly stating false statements about me. His forum ID is belevitt
Here are some of his posts:
"I purchased the v3 minicigarette from this company and I can't urge people strongly enough to stay away from this company. The product was defective out of the box and the customer support was pitiful. One of the two atomizers broke within a week and the batteries are only good for a single use before requiring charging. This company is dishonest and sells awful products. If you like not being cheated, do not give your money to this company."
"This company is dishonest and will sell you an awful product. I purchased the v3 mini cigarette from them less than a week ago and it is already broken. Their customer service suggested that I buy their more expensive product because the smaller one is "only for aesthetic purposes". This company will scam you."
First of all, the inability to respond to certain threads due to being a "supplier" seems rather unfair. I totally understand that such system has been implemented to prevent suppliers from posting biased opinions about their own product. However, when it comes to comments like above, I feel helpless that I cannot even respond to defend myself.
This forum member states that the products were defective out of the box, while one of the two atomizers broke within a week. Defective out of of box and atomizer breaking in a week are totally opposite statements. They do not go together. A broken atomizer does not mean that I am dishonest and my products are awful.
The forum member contacted me through my website. I have sent out a replacement atomizer upon receiving his complaint. I did not even ask him to return the non-working atomizer. Please tell me suppliers, if this a dishonest customer service?
The forum member contacted me once again stating that his other atomizer was not working. And this point, I suspected something wrong and I asked him to return the non-working atomizer, before I send out a replacement.
Did he return the non-working atomizer? No, instead he posted this here:
"They are offering to replace it provided I spend the 30.00 in shipping to get the piece of crap back to China. I would like to remind people to employ common sense and not buy a product directly from individuals whose grasp of English is tenuous at best. It is their ridiculous claims that will get these wonderful contraptions banned in the US."
Isn't sending back the non-working parts for a replacement a normal procedure? What if you purchased an mp3 player at a local BestBuy but it was defective? Wouldn't you return the non-working product before receiving a replacement? The same rules apply for online stores.
And it doesn't cost $30 to send a single atomizer to China. Ridiculous claims to get these wonderful contraptions banned in the US? There isn't a single health claim on my website. So what is all this non-sense?
I still remember this forum back in the days, when old members such SmokeyJoe, Leaford, and Kate participated a lot and lead the forum. It was a peaceful and a friendly community. Now I see that everyone is bashing at each other and calling suppliers scammers. I fear that this forum has grown to big and is now out of control.
For all other suppliers who are doing their jobs properly, please do not get offended by immature forum members that write biased, and dishonest things about you and your products. I can't blame the nature of an internet community, but it is very discouraging that that the forum lost it's old presence.
I would like to share my frustrations with a forum member who's been constantly stating false statements about me. His forum ID is belevitt
Here are some of his posts:
"I purchased the v3 minicigarette from this company and I can't urge people strongly enough to stay away from this company. The product was defective out of the box and the customer support was pitiful. One of the two atomizers broke within a week and the batteries are only good for a single use before requiring charging. This company is dishonest and sells awful products. If you like not being cheated, do not give your money to this company."
"This company is dishonest and will sell you an awful product. I purchased the v3 mini cigarette from them less than a week ago and it is already broken. Their customer service suggested that I buy their more expensive product because the smaller one is "only for aesthetic purposes". This company will scam you."
First of all, the inability to respond to certain threads due to being a "supplier" seems rather unfair. I totally understand that such system has been implemented to prevent suppliers from posting biased opinions about their own product. However, when it comes to comments like above, I feel helpless that I cannot even respond to defend myself.
This forum member states that the products were defective out of the box, while one of the two atomizers broke within a week. Defective out of of box and atomizer breaking in a week are totally opposite statements. They do not go together. A broken atomizer does not mean that I am dishonest and my products are awful.
The forum member contacted me through my website. I have sent out a replacement atomizer upon receiving his complaint. I did not even ask him to return the non-working atomizer. Please tell me suppliers, if this a dishonest customer service?
The forum member contacted me once again stating that his other atomizer was not working. And this point, I suspected something wrong and I asked him to return the non-working atomizer, before I send out a replacement.
Did he return the non-working atomizer? No, instead he posted this here:
"They are offering to replace it provided I spend the 30.00 in shipping to get the piece of crap back to China. I would like to remind people to employ common sense and not buy a product directly from individuals whose grasp of English is tenuous at best. It is their ridiculous claims that will get these wonderful contraptions banned in the US."
Isn't sending back the non-working parts for a replacement a normal procedure? What if you purchased an mp3 player at a local BestBuy but it was defective? Wouldn't you return the non-working product before receiving a replacement? The same rules apply for online stores.
And it doesn't cost $30 to send a single atomizer to China. Ridiculous claims to get these wonderful contraptions banned in the US? There isn't a single health claim on my website. So what is all this non-sense?
I still remember this forum back in the days, when old members such SmokeyJoe, Leaford, and Kate participated a lot and lead the forum. It was a peaceful and a friendly community. Now I see that everyone is bashing at each other and calling suppliers scammers. I fear that this forum has grown to big and is now out of control.
For all other suppliers who are doing their jobs properly, please do not get offended by immature forum members that write biased, and dishonest things about you and your products. I can't blame the nature of an internet community, but it is very discouraging that that the forum lost it's old presence.
Last edited: