Selecting the correct juice density.
- Thread starter Al Bundy
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
-
- Tags
- dosage dose measurements nicotine
- Status
Umm puffs from analogs are not the same for everyone. My husband and I can start smoking at the same time and he always finishes before me. Guess it depends on lung size or intake...
Already purchased some 8 mg density juice. It's the closest I could find to 7 mg.
No Al, you spread misinformation about puff counts. You were told there were too many variables to be accurate but you insisted that you knew how they worked out.
Now I'm saying that you don't know what you're talking about and bringing other issues such as the FDA to the thread is an attempt to cover your tracks.
Work your nicotine out how Jaaxx said and quit your assumptions.
Now I'm saying that you don't know what you're talking about and bringing other issues such as the FDA to the thread is an attempt to cover your tracks.
Work your nicotine out how Jaaxx said and quit your assumptions.
Bundy--every issue you have rasied here today has been hashed out over and over again--from possible bans, to anti-smoker sediments, to the saftey and hazards of nicotine. You have added nothing constuctive to the issues at hand except confusion and enough time has been wasted today on you---Sun
Umm puffs from analogs are not the same for everyone. My husband and I can start smoking at the same time and he always finishes before me. Guess it depends on lung size or intake...
Yes I realize that, but your analog puffs are going to equivalent to your e-cig puffs because YOU have the same lung action. The intake for the same person should be nearly equivalent.
now cut that in half and then again then again and then maybe once more then again by a third then a add little water then fill your cig and vape vape vape
Well feel free to go start your own thread on what you deem productive. I started this thread to hash out some of my questions, not to appease you in any fashion.
You know in statistics, assumptions are made all the time. The difference is at some point you have to VERIFY the assumptions made which is the intent of this thread.
BTW, it is a very logical assumption.
Not necessarilly as I tend to draw harder with an e-cig. Still learning how hard to puff and for how long as if I did this with an analog I would be hot boxing it constantly.
We'll see. I'm starting my EE courses this semester and over the coming year that puts me in a very good position to consider the e-cig equipment design and rigorously test it using proper statistical methods.*
Hey you never know, in a couple years you could buying products I designed.
Verify please - how do you determine that vaping is equivalent to smoking puff for puff?
Your assumptions could mislead vulnerable people, cause them to misjudge their dose and take double.
If they are facts then prove them, if not then please refrain from stating them as fact.
Your assumptions could mislead vulnerable people, cause them to misjudge their dose and take double.
If they are facts then prove them, if not then please refrain from stating them as fact.
Precisely, there is no way to figure it out exactly so all this stuff is moot
In what world is a fact an assumption? Did you just completely ignore my posts?
Anyway I'm done with this thread. I'm satisfied with my rough estimates. Enjoy yourselves.
Nobody said a fact was an assumption as far as I know. You said your assumptions were facts.
You're a bit mixed up.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
