- Status
As any chemist will tell you Dan, if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate.
5.23
Dan
Weisenheimer. I could swear that you keep posting about 3-4 wraps and then you get the ohms I get from 6, is why I asked.... But then again perhaps I just have a giant jumble of posts mixed up in my brain and you never said it.
It's confusing because he said 3 -4 wraps,,,, I took that to be +3 to Negative 4 because it is upsidedown.
It's confusing because he said 3 -4 wraps,,,, I took that to be +3 to Negative 4 because it is upsidedown.
Ah, I forgot to run it through the Gummytranslator.
Naturally the length depends on placement of connectors and diameter of the coil around the wick but my results are:
3.5 wraps ==> 1.3Ω
4.5 wraps ==> 1.7Ω
My connectors are about as close to the wick as you can get and my wicks are about 1.9 mm in diameter.
I have little to no measurable resistance in the rest of the circuit (leads, solder joints, etc) but that could also be a factor from one setup to another.
Yes, that's all so true, there are many small factors that will make a difference, its darned hard to compare apples to apples here.
Could you reverse the juice tank with the air chamber? It seems that you could use a loop of ss wick and have the inner tube that was the juice tank smaller and could hold more liquid or make it more compact but still easily hold 5+ ml of liquid? You could almost use atty size inner tubing for airflow from the coils
to further go with my last reply with reversing the tanks you could put a small threaded hole in the top to have a screw in to fill with a syringe or maybe put in a rubber valve like a football and thread the needle into it
edit:
better yet reverse the air and juice and offset the air tube to connect with the drip tip on top and still have a single ss wick that curves do to the coils allowing you to have the rubber up top to fill with a syringe.. I will test it out for you if you build it
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
