The health studies surrounding Sucralose seem more controversial than the FDA's opinion of e-cigs. Further, the debate has been going much longer with no clear-cut winner.
Sucralose (splenda) and Ejuice - Vendors who do not use
- Thread starter Racehorse
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
The health studies surrounding Sucralose seem more controversial than the FDA's opinion of e-cigs. Further, the debate has been going much longer with no clear-cut winner.
oh wow. i had no idea. i don't generally have a problem with sucralose, but i do with aspartame. still though, i'm not sure i want it in my lungs.
One thing that I see a lot here on the ECF, that is somewhat Disquitting, is a mindset that using e-liquids are somehow without Any risk. Perhaps it is because Analogs have well Documented Health Risks and e-liquids currently Do Not.
But just because there is no Current, Long Term Health Risk associated with something Doesn’t mean that there is No Risk in using a product.
The choice of Sweeteners should Definitely be a Concern. But why is So Much focus place on Only One component of e-liquids?
I don’t Read much about the Concerns of Colorants in e-Liquids? And I Read a Lot that the Food Flavorings used to make Flavored e-Liquids is “Safe” because they have been around for a Long Time.
But the Simple Fact is that Colorants and Food Flavorings were Never Engineered to be Vaporized and then Habitually Inhaled. So why is there Little Concern about these Chemical Compounds like there is about Sweeteners?
For me, I look at using Flavored, Sweetened and even perhaps Artificially Colored e-Liquids as Risk Reduction over the Use of Analogs. Not Risk Free, Risk Reduction.
But just because there is no Current, Long Term Health Risk associated with something Doesn’t mean that there is No Risk in using a product.
The choice of Sweeteners should Definitely be a Concern. But why is So Much focus place on Only One component of e-liquids?
I don’t Read much about the Concerns of Colorants in e-Liquids? And I Read a Lot that the Food Flavorings used to make Flavored e-Liquids is “Safe” because they have been around for a Long Time.
But the Simple Fact is that Colorants and Food Flavorings were Never Engineered to be Vaporized and then Habitually Inhaled. So why is there Little Concern about these Chemical Compounds like there is about Sweeteners?
For me, I look at using Flavored, Sweetened and even perhaps Artificially Colored e-Liquids as Risk Reduction over the Use of Analogs. Not Risk Free, Risk Reduction.
Please Do Not ever Ask me what I think About Aspartame.
Of all the Chemical Abominations that have been made Solely with the Intent of Raping Profits from the Ill Informed Masses, with Complete Disregard to Glaring Scientific Evidence of Serious Known Health Risks, and then Sanctioned by the Paid Off FDA, Aspartame has to be the Clear Cut Winner.
Thanks for these posts....I have some allergies/sensitives and until now was not considering which sweetners the ejuices contain! Thought it was issues with PG or others
I was a little drunk when I started http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/new-members-forum/324775-greetings-toxicology.html, but, there is some good info and debate there as well about other ingredients. This isn't the only focus. Sweeteners have too much stigma surrounding them to be lumped in with the rest though.
I agree.
And I wasn't directing Anything I said towards Anyone directly. Sweeteners do have a Stimga linked to them sometimes.
Backing out of the debate a few the real question here is about how it seems some vendors treat these additional sweeteners as part of their proprietary flavor mixture. Should this be allowed and can we identify and list ones that don't?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
