I think the airflow channels were always of interest....and he's made them bigger, but when building my DNA 40 "BB", I noticed I needed A LOT more airflow for that added power. Any airflow restriction can mess with that fine flavor/vapor production recipe.I don't think it will be too much different from the 3. The changes are all feature related, and DD's proprietary chip was pretty excellent.
18650 and a screen, basically. Both marvelous additions but shouldn't change the actual vape very much.
Have you tried Kanger coils in the BORO and/or the all-delrin? Much MUCH better IMO. Bigger variety of coils, different airflow, NI200 for tc, and none of that strange substance that is apparently not so good for you found in the BVC/BDC's. Those things may last a while and are cheap, but I find much better flavor and vape.I have way more problems with the boro tanks than I'll ever have with the BVC's (which is "never").
For ME, perfection was achieved with the original Bridge and the all-delrin tank. In my opinion, neither has yet to be improved upon.
I wish the Rev 4 had a delrin tank option, in fact. But I can't have everything now, can I? Onward, upward.
Interesting and good to know. Have you tried Kangers in your BB. Also, I would find myself sliding open my BB to squeeze out a bit more air for the BVC's even. Even for low/mid-ohmers, I'm curious how those airflow slots will be able to keep up.Sure if you are vaping low ohm's.. Me? I am currently rockin' it @ 12 watts with a 2.1 ohm BVC in there.. I don't notice any difference at all compared to my rev 3a as far as airflow goes..
I believe he made the air holes larger for the low ohm'ers..
Suprised you no like the kangers. They have such a huge variety, one may think you'd find one that suits you. But everyone's diff.Yes I tried the Kangers and hated them.. Well hated is a strong word so lets just say I prefer the BVC's by a large margin over them.
TC? I no carez about TC.. Some might / do but not this kiddo!![]()
The smaller kangers do slide in. The confusing thing is that Kanger has gone from square, small round (fits Deleon tank), and now up to larger roundThey work fine in the Boro as long as you slide the glass down far enough to get the coil inside..
That's how I broke my tank glass though. I was sliding it down to get the coil in, slid it down to far and it flew off and onto the tile floor.
I was hoping the new smaller round Kangers would just slide in the tank hole like the BVC's do but they don't.
Kanger 1.2-1.5's have a tighter draw than their Clapton, ceramic, NI200 and sub ohm coils. The flavor is much better IMO. BVC's have some weird material in them too...I've heard. Kangers will also take any juice you through at them. BVC's clog up/get dirty and lose flavor quicker imo. Kanger. Kanger. Kanger for me. To each their own.Congratulazioni to all the new B Box4 owners!!!!!! What a marvelous weekend, and for those still F5'ing, you'll get yours soon, too!
VERY nice, Brett. Very nice indeed. (Love the middle one, a lot!)
And I thank you for posting the pic of it....... it's amazing on the B Box.
BVC monster here, too. I appreciate that many love the Kangers, but I've never met one I liked.
LOL!!!!!!! Oh man do I HEAR you on THAT one!!!
Hmmm..... Thank you for this report, bakke. It affirms for me that the Kangers are a no-go. I love the draw on the BVCs and would not want airier.
30% more vapor is insignificant to me, but flavor is very significant! So less flavor ...... nope.
Yikes.
(bvcs, ftw)
Have some Floridian fun, DBDoooooooooooooo! Have some for me, for all of us!
To each their own indeed....I must say that I trust DD's reason for including the Evolv chip with tc. I think it's clear he's built things that he has to like FIRST....that combined with the masses who swear by it lead me to recommend giving it another ....I tired TC like last year maybe?? I can't remember.. To me it's a gimmick but to each their own..
My BVC's pump out plenty of flavor.....