~The Billet Box~ page 1559 continued...

Status
Not open for further replies.

raqball

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 22, 2010
4,283
9,282
Friday photo bomb!

DSC_0009.jpg


DSC_0010.jpg


DSC_0011.jpg


DSC_0012.jpg


DSC_0013.jpg
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
I don't think it will be too much different from the 3. The changes are all feature related, and DD's proprietary chip was pretty excellent.

18650 and a screen, basically. Both marvelous additions but shouldn't change the actual vape very much.
I think the airflow channels were always of interest....and he's made them bigger, but when building my DNA 40 "BB", I noticed I needed A LOT more airflow for that added power. Any airflow restriction can mess with that fine flavor/vapor production recipe.
 

raqball

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 22, 2010
4,283
9,282
Sure if you are vaping low ohm's.. Me? I am currently rockin' it @ 12 watts with a 2.1 ohm BVC in there.. I don't notice any difference at all compared to my rev 3a as far as airflow goes..

I believe he made the air holes larger for the low ohm'ers..
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
I have way more problems with the boro tanks than I'll ever have with the BVC's (which is "never").

For ME, perfection was achieved with the original Bridge and the all-delrin tank. In my opinion, neither has yet to be improved upon.

I wish the Rev 4 had a delrin tank option, in fact. But I can't have everything now, can I? Onward, upward.
Have you tried Kanger coils in the BORO and/or the all-delrin? Much MUCH better IMO. Bigger variety of coils, different airflow, NI200 for tc, and none of that strange substance that is apparently not so good for you found in the BVC/BDC's. Those things may last a while and are cheap, but I find much better flavor and vape.
 

raqball

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 22, 2010
4,283
9,282
Yes I tried the Kangers and hated them.. Well hated is a strong word so lets just say I prefer the BVC's by a large margin over them.

TC? I no carez about TC.. Some might / do but not this kiddo! :D

A few years ago there was a study saying drinking milk was bad for you... I still drank it and I lived!
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
Sure if you are vaping low ohm's.. Me? I am currently rockin' it @ 12 watts with a 2.1 ohm BVC in there.. I don't notice any difference at all compared to my rev 3a as far as airflow goes..

I believe he made the air holes larger for the low ohm'ers..
Interesting and good to know. Have you tried Kangers in your BB. Also, I would find myself sliding open my BB to squeeze out a bit more air for the BVC's even. Even for low/mid-ohmers, I'm curious how those airflow slots will be able to keep up.
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
Yes I tried the Kangers and hated them.. Well hated is a strong word so lets just say I prefer the BVC's by a large margin over them.

TC? I no carez about TC.. Some might / do but not this kiddo! :D
Suprised you no like the kangers. They have such a huge variety, one may think you'd find one that suits you. But everyone's diff.
You should give tc a shot.
I don't always use tc, but when I do I use Kanger NI200. Stay vaping my friends.

Tc is for flavor, not vapor production and who doesn't appreciate flavor?
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
They work fine in the Boro as long as you slide the glass down far enough to get the coil inside..

That's how I broke my tank glass though. I was sliding it down to get the coil in, slid it down to far and it flew off and onto the tile floor.

I was hoping the new smaller round Kangers would just slide in the tank hole like the BVC's do but they don't.
The smaller kangers do slide in. The confusing thing is that Kanger has gone from square, small round (fits Deleon tank), and now up to larger round
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
Congratulazioni to all the new B Box4 owners!!!!!! What a marvelous weekend, and for those still F5'ing, you'll get yours soon, too!





VERY nice, Brett. Very nice indeed. (Love the middle one, a lot!)




And I thank you for posting the pic of it....... it's amazing on the B Box.




BVC monster here, too. I appreciate that many love the Kangers, but I've never met one I liked.





LOL!!!!!!! Oh man do I HEAR you on THAT one!!!





Hmmm..... Thank you for this report, bakke. It affirms for me that the Kangers are a no-go. I love the draw on the BVCs and would not want airier.

30% more vapor is insignificant to me, but flavor is very significant! So less flavor ...... nope. :)





Yikes.

(bvcs, ftw)





Have some Floridian fun, DBDoooooooooooooo! Have some for me, for all of us!
Kanger 1.2-1.5's have a tighter draw than their Clapton, ceramic, NI200 and sub ohm coils. The flavor is much better IMO. BVC's have some weird material in them too...I've heard. Kangers will also take any juice you through at them. BVC's clog up/get dirty and lose flavor quicker imo. Kanger. Kanger. Kanger for me. To each their own.
 

Greenj22

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 5, 2016
84
407
44
I tired TC like last year maybe?? I can't remember.. To me it's a gimmick but to each their own.. :)

My BVC's pump out plenty of flavor.....
To each their own indeed....I must say that I trust DD's reason for including the Evolv chip with tc. I think it's clear he's built things that he has to like FIRST....that combined with the masses who swear by it lead me to recommend giving it another ....
 

raqball

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 22, 2010
4,283
9,282
Well that's what great about vaping.. options, options, options..

TC, low ohm cloud machines, tootle puffers, Kangers, BVC's, RBA, RDA oh my.. Pick what you like and rock it! No 2 people vape the same and I won't question anyone's vaping preference or style because if it works for them, it works for them and that is all that really matters.

Anywho, off to get my daily bike ride in so hi ho, hi ho, it's off I go! :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread