~The Billet Box~ page 1559 continued...
- Thread starter Doug Dino
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Waiting for the BILLETBRIDGE COMFORT to be stocked at Atmistique. Anxious to grab one, and a D/T.
I honestly never thought about it that way, I bought the spares kit from bb a long time ago, (for the rev3) I also ordered separately the red gasket for the boro tank, and have never used any of the spares I bought, I bought them just in case. While I understand why you would think that way, I am still using the boro tank with the same gaskets I bought in 2013.
KAS
I honestly never thought about it that way, I bought the spares kit from bb a long time ago, (for the rev3) I also ordered separately the red gasket for the boro tank, and have never used any of the spares I bought, I bought them just in case. While I understand why you would think that way, I am still using the boro tank with the same gaskets I bought in 2013.
KAS
I kind of agree with @TheotherSteveS... Didn't the old BB's come with the care kit? I thought they did.. Maybe not the entire contents of the care kit they now sell but it at least came with a bottle, nozzles and gaskets if I remember correctly..
Also, the BB's, while I think they are fairly priced, they are pretty expensive as far as mods go these days.. Heck you can buy a $30 Chinese mod and you get everything included, kitchen sink and all! LOL
I think the BB should come with a care kit and I think when buying a Boro tank it should come with a replacement gasket...
My .02
Just a question . . . Has anyone contacted "DD" and maybe asked/suggested any of these as an option for the future? As an example for a Billet Box version 3:
1) Boro Replacement O-Rings Bag
1) Boro Replacement O-Rings Bag
- 4 Buna-N tank O-rings (1.5mm X 9mm)
- 2 Buna-N Brass Ring O-rings (1.5 X 5.5mm)
- 2 Boro Glass windows
- 4 Orange Silicon Boro Gasket
Just a question . . . Has anyone contacted "DD" and maybe asked/suggested any of these as an option for the future? As an example for a Billet Box version 3:
1) Boro Replacement O-Rings Bag
- 4 Buna-N tank O-rings (1.5mm X 9mm)
2) Boro Glass & Gasket Replacement Bag
- 2 Buna-N Brass Ring O-rings (1.5 X 5.5mm)
- 2 Boro Glass windows
Once again - Just a thought . . .
- 4 Orange Silicon Boro Gasket
I'm sure many people have posed the idea to BBV.
I can't imagine nobody has made mention of it...
It's one thing to not include the extra tank gasket, since those gaskets are likely custom made for BBV...but to not include at least one set of spare O-rings for the top & bottom of the tank has always been strange to me.
I mean, it's been a standard practice of the high-end atomizer makers to include spares...heck, even the cheap China-mizers throw in extras.
Not trying to jump on the bandwagon here and "attack" BBV...just wanted to chime in and stand with the group on this subject.
Sooo, is there likely to be a sale this weekend? The last one I see mentioned on FB was April 22.
Hey all!
So I teased you with pictures of an atomizer that I modified to work with the A-tank.
I have since been in touch with the maker of this atomizer, and I've got some questions.
A main concern is the required purchase of the A-tank itself.
Is the additional cost of the A-tank prohibitive to the purchase of the atomizer?
Will people be thrown off by having to buy a special tank for this atomizer?
Apparently BBV didn't think so, as they created and released this option.
That being said, if this atomizer could deliver an airflow range that satisfies both MTL and DTL, would that be enticing enough to warrant the extra cost of buying the A-tank?
--------
If the A-tank becomes the chosen chariot for this atomizer, there would be little redesign required.
They would only be faced with the goal of adding airflow control.
If the standard Boro tank is chosen, the atomizer may need to be redesigned from the ground up...which delays release, and potentially sacrifices features/functions of the current design.
-------
Any thoughts here?
I know a lot of you are MTL users, but there are some DTL peoples here too!
I'm kind of an oddball (goes without saying) in that I can DTL a Kayfun Lite...so a tighter DTL draw does not bother me, nor does an airy MTL draw.
But I'm looking for input from those that are firmly planted on one side of the fence, or the other.
How airy is too airy for an MTL?
How tight is too tight for a DTL?
Can you provide your experience with other atomizers, especially those created for the BBox?
I know vaping is 100% subjective, and everyone finds vastly different things to their own liking.
Thanks in advance!
I really think we are on the verge of helping an established vape company make an atomizer that satisfies a wider range of needs for BBox users, since the current offerings seem to sway too far to either end of the spectrum. (Based on what I've gathered here.)
So I teased you with pictures of an atomizer that I modified to work with the A-tank.
I have since been in touch with the maker of this atomizer, and I've got some questions.
A main concern is the required purchase of the A-tank itself.
Is the additional cost of the A-tank prohibitive to the purchase of the atomizer?
Will people be thrown off by having to buy a special tank for this atomizer?
Apparently BBV didn't think so, as they created and released this option.
That being said, if this atomizer could deliver an airflow range that satisfies both MTL and DTL, would that be enticing enough to warrant the extra cost of buying the A-tank?
--------
If the A-tank becomes the chosen chariot for this atomizer, there would be little redesign required.
They would only be faced with the goal of adding airflow control.
If the standard Boro tank is chosen, the atomizer may need to be redesigned from the ground up...which delays release, and potentially sacrifices features/functions of the current design.
-------
Any thoughts here?
I know a lot of you are MTL users, but there are some DTL peoples here too!
I'm kind of an oddball (goes without saying) in that I can DTL a Kayfun Lite...so a tighter DTL draw does not bother me, nor does an airy MTL draw.
But I'm looking for input from those that are firmly planted on one side of the fence, or the other.
How airy is too airy for an MTL?
How tight is too tight for a DTL?
Can you provide your experience with other atomizers, especially those created for the BBox?
I know vaping is 100% subjective, and everyone finds vastly different things to their own liking.
Thanks in advance!
I really think we are on the verge of helping an established vape company make an atomizer that satisfies a wider range of needs for BBox users, since the current offerings seem to sway too far to either end of the spectrum. (Based on what I've gathered here.)
For what it's worth, I'm strictly a MTL vaper and anything over a 2mm ID exit hole is unusable for me. Closing down air from the outside is not the same effect even if the draw feels the same. If the exit hole under the coil is going to bigger that 2mm, I hope it's much like like 3mm +, that way I can close it down myself using a DIY Teflon reducer or KFV5 MTL kit pin.
What is an A-tank? I only know of 3, the original clear faced, all plastic tank, the opaque delrin tank, and the glass faced Boro tank. Thanks!
Does the bottom plastic piece on the SXK Billet Box Exocet Styled RDA Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer act as an AFC? It is a separate piece that looks like it can be turned to cover the air inlet.
Clone? YIKES!
But to answer the Q, yes it act in the same manner as the legit one.. Rotate it to adjust airflow. You can completely remove it as well if you'd like.
But to answer the Q, yes it act in the same manner as the legit one.. Rotate it to adjust airflow. You can completely remove it as well if you'd like.
Yep, clone. I don't skimp when I get a mod I want, but on an atomizer, yea, I'll go with a decent looking clone, especially if it's something I'm not sure I'll like and use.
Sorry all...
The A-tank is a special Boro tank with a larger diameter bottom hole, that comes with a bridge to use the Atlantis family of coils.
The A-tank is a special Boro tank with a larger diameter bottom hole, that comes with a bridge to use the Atlantis family of coils.
I would prefer to not have to buy the A-Tank. However, since the original Atomizer in question also used other pre-made coils I would assume it need to retain its original size to keep that functionality...so I would vote for A-Tank to keep costs down and keep original functionality.
Just to be clear, I meant to keep R&D costs down and hopefully retail price. Obviously there will be the added costs of A-Tank if you don't already own one.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
