The Really Big RY4 Roundup (long)

Status
Not open for further replies.

clnire

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2013
7,719
73,217
Florida
In October there was a thread in one of the vaping groups on Facebook about birthdays, if any vendors sent birthday presents to customers. I mentioned my birthday was coming up. Steve Bassett of SteamJuice posted he would send me something for my birthday. I had never ordered from him. We emailed back and forth a bit, I told him I may be strange, but I did not think it would be fair for him to send me something when I had not been a customer. We decided when I place an order I should put a comment in that we "talked" and he would include something for my birthday (which was in October but at least I get to pay the shipping, not him. I feel better with that). For Black Friday he ran a nice sale and I ordered a bottle of Jerry' juice. Put a note in the comments about our emails. Yesterday I got my SteamJuice package with my bottle of Jerry's juice and a bottle of his new Toasted RY4!!!!!! Clickin' my heels in a happy dance. :rickroll: :rickroll:

I don't know if I will like it or not, have not even dripped it yet and am going away for business this week for the week. When I get home I will try it and also try to post a semi-review. I would send some to Bill, but it is only 6 mg and high VG, so we shall see how it goes. I will do my best to post a reasonable review. :) :D I like a man of his words.
 

TexasVet

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2013
357
1,403
The Republic of ... TEXAS
...
Falling in love with a new juice is never trustworthy for me, so take what I'm about to write with a grain of salt, but Gambler is an incredible juice. Even as a custom RY4, it's distinctly atypical and idiosyncratic---probably because of the hazelnut---so I'll leave it graded as A- rather than raising it to an A. (For me, the A group is reserved for RY4s that display the essence of what a great RY4 should be, and Gambler deviates from that in its own eccentric way.) Nonetheless, Gambler is a scrumptious eliquid. So delicious, and more than a little seductive. Although it doesn't taste anything like BWB RY4, both of those juices share that seductive quality of sneaking up on me. At first vape, my brain's reaction is "Well, this is sort of OK, but odd, and I'm not totally sure that I like it." The second draw is better, and the third better still. "Sort of OK" morphs into "Yum." By the tenth toke, my brain is inebriated with pleasure. The juice is still a little odd, but I no longer care.

Best of all, Gambler isn't just for RY4 lovers. The synthetic tobacco base is so tasty that tobacco vapers will dig it as a terrific hybrid blend---a nutty tobacco combined with sweeter bakery flavorings, but not cloyingly or artificially sweet.

I'll bet that MOV's going to sell a lot of this.

This is amazing timing for me so I can't thank you enough for this comeback so soon after your last review and grading of Gambler

I have been vaping Organic#1 all day and enjoying it immensely. I jumped onto the forum this evening and found your latest on Gambler and decided that 3 days was long enough so I loaded up about 1ml and fired it up.

Be advised, this is no comparison SO....

I can agree that my reaction was very similar to your "Well, this is sort of OK, but odd, and I'm not totally sure that I like it."

After that it went in the other direction. ie. not convinced I like it, to oh, this is not my kind of flavor at all, then, is this milliliter gone yet!

So I will ask as I may have found a bit of a clue to my tastes. Hazelnut is probably it's strong point this early thereby 'nuttiness' may be the very essence NOT to my liking.

I will keep trying as days go by to see if 'the prob' diminishes. Ok so to the question...

Is the nuttiness part of the tobacco or is it in the flavors of Caramel or Vanilla?

Or could I be confusing nuttiness with burnt caramel or something which may be part of the blend?
 
Last edited:

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
I jumped onto the forum this evening and found your latest on Gambler and decided that 3 days was long enough so I loaded up about 1ml and fired it up. I can agree that my reaction was very similar to your "Well, this is sort of OK, but odd, and I'm not totally sure that I like it." After that it went in the other direction. ie. not convinced I like it, to oh, this is not my kind of flavor at all, then, is this milliliter gone yet!

So I will ask as I may have found a bit of a clue to my tastes. Hazelnut is probably it's strong point this early thereby 'nuttiness' may be the very essence NOT to my liking. I will keep trying as days go by to see if 'the prob' diminishes. Ok so to the question...

Is the nuttiness part of the tobacco or is it in the flavors of Caramel or Vanilla? Or could I be confusing nuttiness with burnt caramel or something which may be part of the blend?

TexasVet,

My usual disclaimer applies, in that I cannot write with anything approaching absolute authority. My response will be my opinion, which could be mistaken.

I feel sure that what you're tasting---and not liking---is the nutty element of MOV Gambler. Now, Burley is a tobacco with an inherently nutty flavor, but I think the nuttiness we're discussing here is necessarily an added element. The question that applies is whether the nuttiness was added during formulation of Gambler's synthetic tobacco base or during the final mix in the same way that caramel or vanilla are added. Knowing from exchanges with Steve at MOV what he went through in coming up with new synthetic tobaccos (each of MOV's newly released tobacco blends uses its own synthetic tobacco base, and Steve conducted trials of literally hundreds of experimental tobacco bases to find the one he liked for each new tobacco juice blend), I'd wager that the nuttiness is contained within the tobacco base. In other words, the hazelnut is probably part of the tobacco flavoring in Gambler.

Keep in mind also what I wrote in my review: "RY4 fans who don’t like nutty RY4s might steer clear of Gambler." I meant that, and it applies even more strongly for vapers who don't like hazelnut, or at least don't like it in this particular juice. You might be fine with peanut, pecan, or walnut, and just not like hazelnut. Or you might be OK with hazelnut in a different juice. You would know that better than I.

As usual, it's not that one of us is wrong and the other right. I just happen to be won over by the nuttiness in Gambler, while you are put off by it. No conflict there---one man's ceiling is another man's floor. I would conclude that Gambler is simply not for you.

Is Gambler a custom RY4 blend that you might later come to appreciate or even like, as an "acquired taste"? I don't know, but my experience makes me doubt it. I sometimes come around to enjoying juices that initially confused my palate and about which I felt uncertain. That's rare, but it has happened. By contrast, I can't think of a single juice that I flat-out didn't like initially that ever became palatable to me, no matter how much time elapsed. For me, if I clearly don't like a juice right off, I'll never like it. You may be different.
 

Sero

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 29, 2009
191
157
Spa City, AR
I figured I would tip off some fellow Tribeca lovers in here about something. Many of us have been searching for a clone of Tribcca so we can save some money and have something that tastes like Tribeca, but isn't exactly the same to change it up some days. DuraSmoke makes a juice called Truebeca now. This is the closest thing to the real deal I have tried. Mr Vape RY4 has the caramel element, but it is missing the full flavor Tribeca brings to the table. Truebeca has that same satisfying full flavor. The only difference is the Truebeca has a more pronounced nutty/AP element. Almost like mixing Tribeca with a little bit of 555. It is not overwhelming and the other flavors still shine though. I found thus from my local B&M, but it can be found online as well.
 

TexasVet

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2013
357
1,403
The Republic of ... TEXAS
My usual disclaimer applies, in that I cannot write with anything approaching absolute authority. My response will be my opinion, which could be mistaken.

No-one here can do any better than that

I feel sure that what you're tasting---and not liking---is the nutty element of MOV Gambler. Now, Burley is a tobacco with an inherently nutty flavor, but I think the nuttiness we're discussing here is necessarily an added element.

Thanks as I didn't know this about Burley tobacco either.

Keep in mind also what I wrote in my review: "RY4 fans who don’t like nutty RY4s might steer clear of Gambler." I meant that, and it applies even more strongly for vapers who don't like hazelnut, or at least don't like it in this particular juice.

And this is EXACTLY what I didn't know, until now and will try to avoid in future purchases

As usual, it's not that one of us is wrong and the other right. I just happen to be won over by the nuttiness in Gambler, while you are put off by it. No conflict there---one man's ceiling is another man's floor. I would conclude that Gambler is simply not for you.

No harm no foul. I pays my money and I takes my chances

Is Gambler a custom RY4 blend that you might later come to appreciate or even like, as an "acquired taste"? I don't know, but my experience makes me doubt it.

Yes, I doubt it too. I'll give it another go after a longer steep. Sometime next year maybe :D

Thanks for helping out.
I'm trying to understand what my taste budds are telling me so I can buy/enjoy the juices available. I will avoid nuttiness in the blends I consider whether they are spoken of in the vendor descriptions or here in ECF in various reviews.
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
I'm wondering if that nuttiness is why I don't care for TFA RY4

TPA/TFA sells three different formulations of RY4: RY4 Type (TFA's first version from some years ago, which was dreadful and not worth even discussing), RY4 Double (TFA's custom RY4), and RY4 Asian (TFA's classic RY4).

I don't get any significant nuttiness from RY4 Double, and none at all from RY4 Asian, so it's a bit of a stretch for me to imagine that your dislike comes from a nutty element. But, as always, YMMV.

For whatever it's worth, I'm not bowled over by any of TFA's RY4 flavorings. For DIY all-in-one RY4 flavorings, FlavourArt and Hangsen RY4s are my top picks, followed by Mom&Pop RY4 v2 and Want2Vape RY4. TFA RY4 Double and RY4 Asian aren't flat-out terrible---some people like them a lot, and I think they're acceptable---but all four I just mentioned, and especially the first two, are far superior, at least to my palate.
 

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
I just peaked at the big list and see I haven't had any RY4 in the "nutty" category, so I don't yet know how I feel about a nut element in an RY4. I have had Highbrowbacco RY4, but as that tasted purely of chemical nastiness to me I only had a few pulls (still have 10ml of 18mg for free to anyone who wants it).

Nutty is an element I've yet to explore much in juice. My instinct is I just don't like it much, with exeptions. No idea if certain nut flavors would work for me while others won't. The NET Puros from HouseofLiquid, which many on the NT thread found to be their favorite HoL NET, to me was overwhelmingly nut and not pleasant at all. My inexperience would say peanut is what type of nut it was like for me, but I'm not convinced enough to say peanut is a specific flavor I dislike. On the other hand, 555E from BWB I really enjoyed, though this was long enough ago I don't remember what I tasted.

Gambler will be my first RY4 with a known hazelnut element. Look forward to it. Also interesting to see that Steve from MOV says each new synthetic tobacco has a unique tobacco recipe. I'm extremely impressed with Americano, and would have been fine finding out that the synthetic tobacco used in that one is the same as the other new ones. As far as I know, that was how many of the discontinued artis were, the same Tennessee tobacco (TNO) base with different flavors. I look forward to trying them all even more now, knowing they each play different on the tobacco side.

Again, I'll make the recommendation for any coffee/espresso tobacco fan to try Americano. Coffee tobacco is one of my favorite tobacco styles, though it seems to be a miss more than a hit. Americano is a big hit for me, better than MOV's coffee NET, Sunday morning.
 

Lombaowski

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 22, 2013
1,156
1,400
DC via the 313
Busted out the Mr Vape RY4 in a carto tank last night and thought I had a bad carto, because I just didn't taste what I wanted to. So I swapped out cartos and still didn't get the best taste.

So I threw it in an EVOD which to me, is still the best tank for me to taste RY4s (strange I know). I have vaped two 1.5ml tanks today, stuff is wonderful. Caramel out front but we definitely have the two other elements there that melds into a terrific vape.

Thanks for suggesting it, yet another winner out of this super thread. :thumb:
 

yellowsnow

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 13, 2013
544
379
New Mexico
TPA/TFA sells three different formulations of RY4: RY4 Type (TFA's first version from some years ago, which was dreadful and not worth even discussing), RY4 Double (TFA's custom RY4), and RY4 Asian (TFA's classic RY4).

I don't get any significant nuttiness from RY4 Double, and none at all from RY4 Asian, so it's a bit of a stretch for me to imagine that your dislike comes from a nutty element. But, as always, YMMV.

For whatever it's worth, I'm not bowled over by any of TFA's RY4 flavorings. For DIY all-in-one RY4 flavorings, FlavourArt and Hangsen RY4s are my top picks, followed by Mom&Pop RY4 v2 and Want2Vape RY4. TFA RY4 Double and RY4 Asian aren't flat-out terrible---some people like them a lot, and I think they're acceptable---but all four I just mentioned, and especially the first two, are far superior, at least to my palate.

Then I'm not sure what it is in the TFA/TPA RY4 and double that I don't seem to care for. The Mr. Vape you rated is exactly as you rated is outstanding to me. I like the ITC also waiting on Butterfly. I knew they where slow but ordered the 29th just updated to awaiting shipment. I will be ordering your top two for DIY was wondering where I where I'd end up on the DIY.:)

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4
 

clnire

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2013
7,719
73,217
Florida
Lamba, I, too, love Evods. I get good flavor, easy to clean/recoil, and look nice on my simple ego twists, spinners and Itaste VV3s. Keeping the ohms 2.0 or above, they work great on my multitude of ego minis. I love the minis for public, I work in the public (dog show vendor) and I don't want to offend customers who don't know or want to know what vaping really is. Plus with all over the country travel, I am not always sure of local vaping laws. They are sturdy with an Evod and survive my pocket carry. BTW, I make leather products for show dogs, and some of my older batteries were looking pretty beat up. I wrapped them in kangaroo leather (kangaroo skin; I make leads from it) and they look sharp and feel so nice in my hand.

Glad you had a good experience with Mr Vape RY4. So far it is my favorite. Now I have Hope RU4Real, Butterfly's RY4, Moondrop Ry42, SteamJuice Toasted RY4 and Mister E-Liquid's RY4 to try (OK, I went a little RY4 crazy for Black Friday/Cyber Monday). I read Bill's list reviews before ordering (well, SteamJuice was a gift), and I am looking forward to trying them all. I am trying to learn to catch the nuances in the different flavors, classic vs custom. I am sure some I will like, some not so much. But with great prices during sales, I figure I can treat myself. I like Heartland, but I can tell from one puff it is higher pg than I can normally handle, so I will enjoy it in small doses. I probably will never try Janty because of the pg content, and although I liked the flavor, I PIFed my bottle of DeKang I got from FastTech for the same reason. Received Vapor Jedi RY4 from a contest win - it is sitting in my "maybe I will revisit it at another time, or not" box. Not for me. Seemed kinda nutty, which I find I don't care for. I won TVRs Ginger's RY4 in a contest, which I do like, but it is different. So by trying these others I hope to be able to round out my favorite RY4 flavor profile better.

OK, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. :smokie: Go Cameron and Tommy! (BTW, did I report their new Peach Cobbler is very good! Well blended, does not scream PEACH, a touch of cinnamon, smooth and I vape several flavors throughout the day. Perfect for morning with my coffee). Nuff said, this is an RY4 thread....
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
I am trying to learn to catch the nuances in the different flavors, classic vs custom.

Distinguishing Classic versus Custom RY4s is usually pretty easy.

Is the flavor profile bright, with a taste that's almost sparkly, effervescent, or has a pronounced high end? That's Classic. Is the taste darker and deeper? That's Custom.

Is the tobacco neutral? Classic. Is the tobacco stronger or more emphatic as a flavor component? Custom.

Is the overall flavor experience singular, meaning that the juice's flavoring ingredients meld together into a unified taste? Classic. Can you taste each of the individual flavorings, either separately or layered, and discern what they are? Custom.

Classic RY4s are almost always pale in color, usually yellow or golden, and always transparent. Custom RY4s are all over the map in color, from a golden transparency to an opaque brown. If the liquid is dark in color, that's invariably Custom.

On rare occasions, a particular RY4 will walk the line between Classic and Custom, with qualities from both genres. Mr.Vape RY4 does that. So do four or five others. That doesn't matter in terms of our liking or not liking the juice, but it might make categorizing a particular RY4 slightly confusing. Most often, however, the genre of a given RY4 (retail or DIY) will be clear as a bell.
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
orb vapor ry4 is one of my favorites

OrbVapor RY4 is one of the very few organic RY4s in the marketplace. The only other organic RY4 on The Big List that comes to mind right now is VapeRite VR4. AceVapers is a British vendor specializing in organic juices. Ace's version of RY4 is called AV4. It hasn't been reviewed, though, and isn't on The Big RY4 List (yet).

RY4 is difficult for many organic juice vendors. To be organic, the tobacco component (an essential ingredient in RY4) has to be either naturally-extracted, organically-grown tobacco or organic Tobacco Absolute, and I'm pretty sure that commercial TA is not derived from organically-grown tobacco.
 

KC33

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 24, 2013
727
571
Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
I'm really diggin VR's KY4. The tobacco base is just wonderful. I find KY4 to be well balanced with the tobacco flavor taking the lead. When I first tried it the caramel was more prevalent but with around 3 weeks of steeping the tobacco really took over. I hope they have a good holiday sale, it's tough putting this down.
 

TexasVet

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2013
357
1,403
The Republic of ... TEXAS
Distinguishing Classic versus Custom RY4s is usually pretty easy.

In a previous post, I noticed GoodProphets GP4 listed in the B- and C- ratings on the Big RY4 List. What I may have found since is the actual reason.
Your Review of GoodProphets GP4 didn't get a rating, just a placement on the list at #28

You also reviewed GoodProphets 18mg VG Joyetech RY4 and rated it a B+ but it is not on the BIG RY4 ROUNDUP LIST

Just in case any of this matters :)

In addition, while I was at GoodProphets ordering hardware on Cyber Monday, I picked up a Dekang RY4 and Dekang DK TAB 10ml on both and a 50 ml Hangsen all 24nic and all PG.

Rec'd them all today and tried all fresh out of a 5day mail hiatus, including 3 ice days preventing a mail run. (don't give any more of that rain, hail, gloom of night crap)

They are all synthetics correct? They don't need any steep time? YES/NO

Jury is still out on likeable flavor, tho the Hangsen starts as better on the palate.:D
 
Last edited:

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
In a previous post, I noticed GoodProphets GP4 listed in the B- and C- ratings on the Big RY4 List. What I may have found since is the actual reason. Your Review of GoodProphets GP4 didn't get a rating, just a placement on the list at #28

You also reviewed GoodProphets 18mg VG Joyetech RY4 and rated it a B+ but it is not on the BIG RY4 ROUNDUP LIST

In vaping time, those linked posts---from two years ago and one year ago respectively---are for me the equivalent of visiting past lives.

I started The Really Big RY4 Roundup thread using numerical rankings, mainly because I had no idea what a Frankenstein monster the thread would become. When the number of RY4s I'd reviewed and put on The Big List became overwhelming, somewhere around the 60 mark, I felt that the numerical rankings were becoming arbitrary and nit-picky (what made the #28 RY4 one rank better than #29 and one worse than #27?). The whole process of ranking every single RY4 was driving me crazy. At that point, roughly six months in, I announced that I would quit altogether ranking RY4s. I believed then---and still feel now---that the very idea of judging RY4s on a public forum was/is fraught with all sorts of vexing problems---from the "taste is subjective" issue through the arrogance of one person (namely, me) presuming to make authoritative pronouncements about which RY4s were "better" or "worse," to the inherent foolishness of "Top 100" lists of anything. General consensus of thread participants at the time, however, remained strongly in favor of rankings.

My compromise was to switch from numerical rankings to giving grades. That way, I'd reduce at least a little the pitfalls of evaluating individual RY4s by grouping them together under various grades (A, A-, B+, etc.).

Since then, two more years have passed. I still believe that the whole notion of giving grades to RY4s is inherently flawed, but I've relaxed about it some. Oh yeah, the grades given still reflect my own particular biases, but I acknowledge having earned a certain "street cred" by vaping more RY4s than 99% of the vapers in the world. My review process now routinely includes comparison-vaping the RY4 under scrutiny against numerous other similar RY4s.

Please keep in mind that the grades I give aren't cast in stone. I don't hesitate to change the grade of a given RY4 up or down as my judgment about it changes over time, usually because of comparison-vaping against other RY4s. The only reason that Good Prophets RY4 was listed under both the B- and C- groups is that I upped the grade at some point and neglected to remove the previous entry. I'm fallible, you know, and keeping all these lists updated and 100% accurate is a lot of very precise work. I correct mistakes as I find them or when I'm informed about them. In the January update of The RY4 Report Card, GP4 will get only one grade, presumably a B-, unless I decide between now and then to change the grade again.

JoyeTech RY4 is still on The Big RY4 List. It's right where it's been since being reviewed a year ago, listed under Good Prophets, the vendor from whom I bought my bottle of JoyeTech RY4.


In addition, while I was at GoodProphets ordering hardware on Cyber Monday, I picked up a Dekang RY4 and Dekang DK TAB 10ml on both and a 50 ml Hangsen all 24nic and all PG. They are all synthetics correct? They don't need any steep time?

All the juices you mention are made with synthetic, lab-based flavorings. I can't state for sure that one or more might not contain some TA, but they're all definitely classed as synthetics and not NETs.

Those juices---and any others you buy or make---need steep time only if you feel that they do. Steeping is another of those subjective factors in vaping. Sure, most juices need some time for the flavorings to meld and bloom, and some juices will change markedly over months, but people often post advice about steeping certain juices that read like objective facts: "Juice A should be steeped for two weeks. Juice B is good to go when you get it." Well, those aren't facts, they're opinions---personal, anecdotal, and subjective, and the statements offered with such seeming certainty may or may not reflect your own experience.

Steeping is what we do intentionally when we aren't 100% thrilled with a new juice, but it's also what happens naturally as our bottles of juice age. My strong suggestion is to take with a huge grain of salt what others post about any particular juice needing steeping (or not), and instead let your own palate be the sole judge.
 

TexasVet

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2013
357
1,403
The Republic of ... TEXAS
In vaping time, those linked posts---from two years ago and one year ago respectively---are for me the equivalent of visiting past lives.


All the juices you mention are made with synthetic, lab-based flavorings. I can't state for sure that one or more might not contain some TA, but they're all definitely classed as synthetics and not NETs.

Those juices---and any others you buy or make---need steep time only if you feel that they do. Steeping is another of those subjective factors in vaping. Sure, most juices need some time for the flavorings to meld and bloom, and some juices will change markedly over months, but people often post advice about steeping certain juices that read like objective facts: "Juice A should be steeped for two weeks. Juice B is good to go when you get it." Well, those aren't facts, they're opinions---personal, anecdotal, and subjective, and the statements offered with such seeming certainty may or may not reflect your own experience.

Steeping is what we do intentionally when we aren't 100% thrilled with a new juice, but it's also what happens naturally as our bottles of juice age. My strong suggestion is to take with a huge grain of salt what others post about any particular juice needing steeping (or not), and instead let your own palate be the sole judge.

Thanks, you confirm what I thought I learned here at ECF.

As far as your list goes, and it's not just your list but any list, and a myriad of others 'things', I'll admit I'm a little ....-retentive about those sort of things so I'll leave the list alone. but it's like breaking a bad habit.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread