The Really Big RY4 Roundup (long)

Status
Not open for further replies.

RPadTV

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 12, 2012
3,398
7,551
Planet Awesome
www.rpad.tv
Maybe RPad got a different version of this juice than I did. My reaction is to reconsider the C+ grade I gave earlier. Based on my experience today, it’s a C-. OrbVapor really needs to rethink their recipe ingredients, mix ratios, and flavor profile on this one.

Orb tweaks formulas regularly, so it's possible, but I'm thinking we vaped the same thing. My bottle was from December 2012. I enjoyed this juice not so much in an RY4 way, but in a way similar to HHV's Gollum. For me, it was more similar to that than any custom RY4s I've had. It's definitely more of a dessert RY4, for sure.

On a side note, I've gone through 30mls of Bill's Pretty Good Classic RY4 in less than six days. Keep in mind that I was vaping other juices as well. So, yeah, I'm sticking with my opinion that this is more than "pretty good." Ha!
 

Cool_Breeze

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 10, 2011
4,117
4,291
Kentucky
I'm currently revisiting Skydancer RY4 NET v11 and enjoying it.

We all know about changing flavors with eliquids. I think my grouping of current flavors in rotation has been kind of tight...somewhat similar in taste. As well, I've just been through a week or 10 days where nothing tasted too great. Skydancer is different enough to stand out.
 

Randy C

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 17, 2012
1,181
2,918
SW Florida
I went out on a limb... I just received my first order from Goodejuice. I have 18mg GJ4 and Patriot steeping in a cool dark place- for at least a week or two.

The GJ4 smells EXACTLY like Cooper Creek House Blend, but with tobacco (something I wish CC would offer) and the Patriot, although not and RY4 variant, gives off a wonderful tobacco aroma.

Update: While GJ4 smells strikingly similar to Cooper Creek House Blend in the bottle, they are millenniums apart when vaped. This GJ4 is good, really good! Tobacco is the star of the show- flavorful, smooth, no "bite" whatsoever, & sweet-but not overly so. I don't think I could ever do a full review of GJ4.... Other than tobacco, my brain literally can't pick out individual components. I know the caramel and vanilla exist, but everything is folded together so well, I just cant get my arms around any individual flavors. Or, maybe my pallet is just all screwed up :)
 
Last edited:

RPadTV

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 12, 2012
3,398
7,551
Planet Awesome
www.rpad.tv
MOV has a 25% off sale today- Code- happyjuly. I ordered up some MOV Virginia Flake RY4. I read your comparison of this to GJ4. After reading your thoughts, I can indeed pick out the "mustyness" of GJ4 that you mentioned. This doesn't bother me in the least, but I can't wait to try MOV

If you enjoy sweetness, I think you'll like Full Virginia Flake. GJ4 and FVF are on opposite ends of the NET RY4 spectrum (wow, that's a lot of acronyms). I really enjoy both, but they're different beasts. Like you mentioned, tobacco is the star of the show in GJ4. FVF has a distinct tobacco taste, but the sweet flavors are way more prominent. I'm looking forward to your thoughts on FVF!
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
I have a tobacco flavor that while good, is very dry. It is Hangsen's RY1. Ethyl Mytol can help it a little, but not a lot. What might be some RY4 compatible flavorings that can add some sense of moistness?

Cool,

I can offer no remedy, mainly because I've never understood the vaping axis of dry/moist. I'm sure I've experienced it---since people refer to it often---but my brain resists somehow. No point in trying to explain dry/moist to me; I've asked about it numerous times in different threads, and the explanations never make a dent in my lack of understanding. Sorry.

I take it that the obvious choices of caramel and/or vanilla don't appeal to you? What about milky creams---regular or whipped? I don't suppose you have another tobacco that you regard as perhaps overly "moist" with which you could frankenjuice some of the drier Hangsen RY1? Even suggesting that probably shows how little I understand the dry/moist thing.
 

Cool_Breeze

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 10, 2011
4,117
4,291
Kentucky
Cool,

I can offer no remedy, mainly because I've never understood the vaping axis of dry/moist. I'm sure I've experienced it---since people refer to it often---but my brain resists somehow. No point in trying to explain dry/moist to me; I've asked about it numerous times in different threads, and the explanations never make a dent in my lack of understanding. Sorry.

I take it that the obvious choices of caramel and/or vanilla don't appeal to you? What about milky creams---regular or whipped? I don't suppose you have another tobacco that you regard as perhaps overly "moist" with which you could frankenjuice some of the drier Hangsen RY1? Even suggesting that probably shows how little I understand the dry/moist thing.

Caramel and Vanilla are fine for me. I just don't know that any in particular might treat dryness. I'm not well versed the various Caramels and Vanillas and thought some might impart more moistness than others. I had hoped a reader might have a thought.
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
Caramel and Vanilla are fine for me. I just don't know that any in particular might treat dryness. I'm not well versed the various Caramels and Vanillas and thought some might impart more moistness than others. I had hoped a reader might have a thought.

In my mind, the most obvious differences between caramels are lean or rich and tight or gooey. Lorann Creamy Caramel is rich and tight---deep, rich, but very focused flavor. Want2Vape Honeycomb Caramel is lean and gooey---not particularly sweet or deep, but more like a pourable caramel topping. Chinese caramel flavorings tend to be lean and tight, as does TFA Caramel Candy. FlavourArt and Capella Caramels are sort in the middle.
 

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
If you enjoy sweetness, I think you'll like Full Virginia Flake. GJ4 and FVF are on opposite ends of the NET RY4 spectrum (wow, that's a lot of acronyms). I really enjoy both, but they're different beasts. Like you mentioned, tobacco is the star of the show in GJ4. FVF has a distinct tobacco taste, but the sweet flavors are way more prominent. I'm looking forward to your thoughts on FVF!

Nice comparison R.

MountainOak and Goode are two of my favorite vendors, but personally FVF has nothing on GJ4. That's just my opinion, many feel otherwise. For me though, sometimes FVF works ok, often not, but GJ4 always impresses.

Sent from my LGL55C using Tapatalk 2
 

Randy C

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 17, 2012
1,181
2,918
SW Florida
Update: While GJ4 smells strikingly similar to Cooper Creek House Blend in the bottle, they are millenniums apart when vaped. This GJ4 is good, really good! Tobacco is the star of the show- flavorful, smooth, no "bite" whatsoever, & sweet-but not overly so. I don't think I could ever do a full review of GJ4.... Other than tobacco, my brain literally can't pick out individual components. I know the caramel and vanilla exist, but everything is folded together so well, I just cant get my arms around any individual flavors. Or, maybe my pallet is just all screwed up :)

Update II: Wow, I've been vaping this for a little over a day in a modified A-7 RBA (on top of a Reo). I've been running it cool- 3.9 volts, 1.5 ohms, 32ga Kanthal, with a cotton wick, and it's time to re-coil/rewick already. This stuff is very tasty, but it is not the cleanest juice I've ever come across. It develops a severe ashtray taste after a short while, so I don't know how long, or if this will continue to work for me. I'd like to see GEJ run this through a finer filtering process.

I have some MOV Virginia Flake RY4 on order, and some Ahlusion Gold Rising steeping- I hope these burn a bit cleaner. This is the problem I come across with most NET's-they tend to be filthy. I find Ahlusion non-aros the cleanest so far...
 

RPadTV

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 12, 2012
3,398
7,551
Planet Awesome
www.rpad.tv
I have some MOV Virginia Flake RY4 on order, and some Ahlusion Gold Rising steeping- I hope these burn a bit cleaner. This is the problem I come across with most NET's-they tend to be filthy. I find Ahlusion non-aros the cleanest so far...

In my experience, Gold Rising vapes similarly to other Ahlusion non-aromatics -- it's very equipment friendly. Full Virginia Flake will be much tougher on your coils.
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
Bear in mind that, while Ahlusion describes Gold Rising as "our take on RY4," Gold Rising is not included on The Big RY4 List. Why? First, because it didn't qualify as an RY4 based on this thread's generally agreed definition of RY4's core ingredients (tobacco, caramel, and vanilla), and second, because Gold Rising simply doesn't taste like an RY4. Yes, it's a lovely NET juice blend, with a delicious smoky tobacco wrapped in honey and other nuanced flavors, but an RY4? Not to our palates.

I don't know what Wlad was thinking on this one. Perhaps Gold Rising is closer to Ruyan 4, the synthetic tobacco blend that was one of the four first-ever vaping juices marketed by the Ruyan Company way back in 2005, and the primary forebear of the original RY4, which---while not a replicant of Ruyan 4---was named RY as an homage to the Ruyan Company's pioneering efforts.
 

MFToms59

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 19, 2012
1,547
3,842
Nevada
... I don't know what Wlad was thinking on this one. Perhaps Gold Rising is closer to Ruyan 4, the synthetic tobacco blend that was one of the four first-ever vaping juices marketed by the Ruyan Company way back in 2005, and the primary forebear of the original RY4, which---while not a replicant of Ruyan 4---was named RY as an homage to the Ruyan Company's pioneering efforts.

You could be 100% on the money that Gold Rising was an attempt at recreating the Original Juice, considered to be the Gold Standard (?), which gave birth to all that followed... ergo the naming of Wlad's juice Gold Rising(as in rebirth/resurrection?).

If that was a proven theory, I'd think it would merit at least some consideration, just my :2c:
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
I have recently been vaping some vintage Janty RY4 from 2010.

This was sent to me by our colleague KentC, along with a number of other well-aged juices from the years that predate my own vaping beginnings. Kent has been diligent in stockpiling and carefully preserving (via amber-glass bottles and freezing) many of his favorite juices from that earlier epoch. As a result, the juices he sent are all alive and well, still producing good vapor and ample flavor. That’s a testament in part to the longevity of vaping ingredients---flavorings (especially synthetics), bases, and liquid nic---and in part to Kent’s care in preservation.

The Janty RY4 he sent me is from the tail-end of those early years when Janty still sold a single RY4. Soon after, Janty diversified into its "Series" lines of eliquids, introducing the Elixir Series in early 2011 while simultaneously re-labeling its previous juices as Classic Series. Then came Vitaya, followed by DK, and finally Abaca. All of which I find a bit confusing, since some juices are duplicated in more than one of the five series.

Presumably, the juice I’m vaping now is the same RY4 that Janty sold throughout 2009-2010.

What’s it like? Well, it’s obviously Classic RY4, with the characteristic tobacco neutrality and unity of overall flavor. Supposedly (at least according to Ludo) this is the same as Janty RY4 DK-series, made from the identical ingredients with the same recipe mix. And yes---judging from the particular juices I’m vaping---they’re close. I can tell them apart, but I think that’s partly because of the very different ages of the juices---one being about nine months old, the other being three years old.

In terms of flavor profiles, the 2010 Janty RY4 may be slightly sweeter than the DK RY4, with less contrasting sourness. Generally, though, I find the sweetness to be roughly equivalent to all the more recent Janty RY4s I have: DK, Classic (in both RY4 and RY4-X), and Elixir. The family resemblance is consistent throughout, with one important caveat: The 2010 Janty RY4 has a mystery flavor in it, very subtle, but present. Kent calls it a smoky muskiness, reminiscent of eastern pine cone pollen (which is not at all typically piney---none of that Pine-Sol weirdness that turns me off to some BWB and Halo tobaccos). Whatever it is, I taste it too, and I’ve never tasted it in any other RY4. I’ll hazard a gonzo guess that the reason Janty stopped using it is because the flavoring---whatever it is---became unavailable, and they strengthened the sour-sweet contrast of their RY4s to compensate. Either that, or the pine pollen flavor was contained in another flavoring ingredient that similarly become unavailable and had to be replaced with a substitute. But that’s just me sitting around and letting my theories run wild. I wasn’t there, and I don’t really know.

I’ll have more to say about the 2010 Janty RY4 in future posts.

Kent also included a bottle of Janty RY2 from 2009 and a pack of unopened, shrink-wrapped carts containing 2009-vintage RY4. These turned out to be carts for an 801 atomizer, so I removed the filler from each of the five and very carefully squeezed out all the juice from the filler. I ended up with a 3ml bottle of 2009 Janty RY4.

The 2009 Janty RY2 isn’t very RY-like. Kent recalls Janty describing it as a “smoke” juice. It’s more of a caramel tobacco blend, and there’s an odd note---not so much a flavor as a tonality---that’s a bit distracting. I didn’t like it much. On the other hand, the 2009 Janty RY4 from the carts tastes great, and almost exactly like the 2010 Janty RY4 to my palate. The only difference (if it’s really there) is that the 2009 Janty is a tiny bit creamier on the tongue after exhale than the 2010 Janty. I also pick up just a smidgen of something that my brain wants to call subtly coffee-like. Anyway, odds seem pretty good that one of these juices may actually be the “original” Janty RY4. Maybe both.

All of which brings me to an interesting dilemma. If I were blindfolded and vaped all the top-rated Classic RY4s---Apollo RY4, Bloog RY4, Dekang RY4, Halo Tribeca, IndigoVapor Classic, the various Jantys, MrVape RY4, SI Volt RY4, Vapor..... (now Vapor’s Knoll) OuR-Y4, and VaporTalk Dulcis---I’m not sure I could accurately identify each one. I think I’d be able to pick out the Dekang, Tribeca, Indigo, and Dulcis, but I can easily imagine that the rest might be mistaken, one for another. Or maybe I’m full of it and I’d get them all wrong. Who knows?

I may run that very test at some point by loading all those Classic RY4s into identical cartos/clearos, then putting them into a large bowl or jar and shaking it up. I could pick out one at a time, being sure not look at the label, and vape it, then give my best shot at identifying which Classic RY4 it was. That’ll have to wait for another day, though. I think it’s probably safe to assume, however, that Custom RY4s are likely to be easier to differentiate and identify accurately than Classic RY4s would be, since the flavor spectrum of Custom is a great deal wider and more diverse.

Membership in the Classic RY4 club requires so much tighter conformity. Not only do you have to dress alike, but you also have to know the secret handshake.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Bear in mind that, while Ahlusion describes Gold Rising as "our take on RY4," Gold Rising is not included on The Big RY4 List. Why? First, because it didn't qualify as an RY4 based on this thread's generally agreed definition of RY4's core ingredients (tobacco, caramel, and vanilla), and second, because Gold Rising simply doesn't taste like an RY4. Yes, it's a lovely NET juice blend, with a delicious smoky tobacco wrapped in honey and other nuanced flavors, but an RY4? Not to our palates.

I don't know what Wlad was thinking on this one. Perhaps Gold Rising is closer to Ruyan 4, the synthetic tobacco blend that was one of the four first-ever vaping juices marketed by the Ruyan Company way back in 2005, and the primary forebear of the original RY4, which---while not a replicant of Ruyan 4---was named RY as an homage to the Ruyan Company's pioneering efforts.

Agree - not RY4 and it was one of the non-aromatics that never lost the ashtray taste for me after long steeping. All the others came around but not Gold Rising for some reason.... For me Smooth Criminal was closer to RY4 but also 'not an RY4' either ;) Still like a lot of their stuff - peachy criminal, house blend, JG blend and more recently peach wild wood... even the aros that I didn't care for were well crafted, no perfume, off tastes, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katya

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
In terms of flavor profiles, the 2010 Janty RY4 may be slightly sweeter than the DK RY4, with less contrasting sourness. Generally, though, I find the sweetness to be roughly equivalent to all the more recent Janty RY4s I have: DK, Classic (in both RY4 and RY4-X), and Elixir. The family resemblance is consistent throughout, with one important caveat: The 2010 Janty RY4 has a mystery flavor in it, very subtle, but present. Kent calls it a smoky muskiness, reminiscent of eastern pine cone pollen (which is not at all typically piney---none of that Pine-Sol weirdness that turns me off to some BWB and Halo tobaccos). Whatever it is, I taste it too, and I’ve never tasted it in any other RY4. I’ll hazard a gonzo guess that the reason Janty stopped using it is because the flavoring---
....

Kent also included a bottle of Janty RY2 from 2009 and a pack of unopened, shrink-wrapped carts containing 2009-vintage RY4. These turned out to be carts for an 801 atomizer, so I removed the filler from each of the five and very carefully squeezed out all the juice from the filler. I ended up with a 3ml bottle of 2009 Janty RY4.

The 2009 Janty RY2 isn’t very RY-like. Kent recalls Janty describing it as a “smoke” juice. It’s more of a caramel tobacco blend, and there’s an odd note---not so much a flavor as a tonality---that’s a bit distracting. I didn’t like it much. On the other hand, the 2009 Janty RY4 from the carts tastes great, and almost exactly like the 2010 Janty RY4 to my palate. The only difference (if it’s really there) is that the 2009 Janty is a tiny bit creamier on the tongue after exhale than the 2010 Janty. I also pick up just a smidgen of something that my brain wants to call subtly coffee-like. Anyway, odds seem pretty good that one of these juices may actually be the “original” Janty RY4. Maybe both.

Nice review Bill. And thanks for the kind comments.

On the bold notes ... I also have not tasted this exact flavoring... I put in an order for the hangsen flavoring you suggested may be close...

I could never vape RY2 for very long because of the overwhelming distracting aspect. Still... it WAS in the historical line up leading to RY4, so imo, significant in that respect... must have been fun trying to find _the end flavor_ that was the hit.

Since I had another unopened pack of 801 Janty RY4 carts I did the same thing :D and you're right. The bottled RY4's smokiness is more prominant and the cream part is better noted in the 2009 carts and closer to what I remember RY4 to be in the bottle AT THAT TIME... so yeah, the dominant note has taken over more with the bottled ejuice than the cartridges. It's a more balanced ejuice in the carts.... Good eye/taste buds! lol...
 

Randy C

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 17, 2012
1,181
2,918
SW Florida
In my experience, Gold Rising vapes similarly to other Ahlusion non-aromatics -- it's very equipment friendly. Full Virginia Flake will be much tougher on your coils.

I really don't mind if it's tough on equipment, because I can wrap a new coil in minutes. What bugs the crap out of me is how a perfectly good liquid transitions to tasting like an ashtray after a half a day of vaping. I guess I have a love/hate relationship with most NET's
 

Cool_Breeze

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 10, 2011
4,117
4,291
Kentucky
The notion of "Dryness" may be ellusive. For myself, the sensation, or taste if you will, can be found in the front third or so of the tounge and more towards the edges and tip than the center. It is somewhat akin to bitterness or acidic taste, but really not quite either of those. Dryness may have a bit of stinginess or sharpness to it. It might be not unlike the throat and back of mouth sensation of a 'dry hit,' but this is more surely in the taste realm and less pronounced than that.

The chart below is an estimation of dryness found among 10 RY4, or related ejuices I have. The relationships are very general. Those names found to the left I find higher in their dryness, and to the right, less dry. The ends of the left-right spectrum shown are arbitrary. The flavors grouped more near each other are more close in their dryness or lack thereof.

AQeFg1h.png



*Skydancer RY4 v11 is noted for the reason that it stimulates the tongue in the same areas and in a similar fashion/degree, but with a quite different result.

Rigorous science may not be in play and all the above is subject to revision and reconsideration. The concept may benefit from improved descriptive language.

Your thoughts are welcomed.
 

billherbst

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 21, 2010
4,239
9,486
Columbia, Missouri
www.billherbst.com
Cool,

Thanks for the yeoman work in trying to explain eliquid "dryness" to someone who is brain-damaged (i.e., me). I'm not sure that I understand any better, but I sure like your post.

Would you say that dryness is independent of flavor intensity? Can a juice with intense, deep, luscious, or in-your-face flavor be dry?

Also, could we perhaps get away with the admittedly crude generalization that---taken as groups---Classic RY4 tends to be drier than Custom RY4?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread