I did forget to take some of the older generations into account, they were definitely exposed to more pressure to smoke than younger generations. I understand growing up in a smoking family, both my parents smoked over a pack a day in the house for all the years I lived there. Funny enough, my parents stopped smoking in the house when my sister's daughter was born so that she could come over and visit them. Evidently they worried more about their granddaughter (is there really supposed to be two "d"s in that word? It looks wrong) than their own children.
Although more likely is that their attitudes have changed in the same way the attitudes of society have changed, they probably look back on smoking in the house all those years and regret it. I'm not sure if that's what made me a smoker, or the trips to my grandparents house where both of them also smoked indoors and used the floor as an ashtray, but whatever influences have gotten to me I still made the dumb choice to start smoking. An older society of acceptance towards smoking and all that entails could be to blame just as much as BT's influences, although one could argue BT manufactured the society of acceptance, so I don't really know where I'm going with this heh heh.
Anyway, basically my point was that I don't really respect or support actions taken by BT, but I don't feel they are to blame, as ultimately they never stuck a cig in anyone's mouth and a gun to their head. A drug dealer or manufacture is a bad guy, but I can't blame him for people using drugs, the demand will be there regardless of who satisfies it, and whoever satisfies it will play the role as villain, even though they are simply supplying a product people want.
Sorry for getting so off-topic, I just wanted to make sure you didn't think I was trying to attack anyone here for their opinion on the matter.