Breakdown of the article:
A doctor from Tyneside has called for more research into "electronic" cigarettes following the death of one of his patients.
---Scare mongering, attention-grabbing blurb.
Mr Miller, who used large quantities of the substitutes, had suffered from a lung disease - severe lipoid pneumonia.
---Which substitutes exactly? Purposely vague to support the FUD of the first paragraph.
Dr Rob Allcock, who treated him at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, believes this could be associated with his use.
---Still vague; his use of what? The doctor doesn't know what killed him and now he's making vague claims about the cause which still isn't stated clearly.
Dr Allcock said that the brand Mr Miller had been using seemed to involve a mixture of nicotine and some oil.
---So the good doctor has no idea what the ingredients are and believes this is the cause? This makes no sense.
"There's extensive literature in the medical world on damage to the lungs due to inhaling oil, which looks very similar to his disease," he said.
---The doctor doesn't know if there's oil in the vague "thing" the patient was using, but because there's an article or two about inhaling oil, this must be the cause. That has got to be the worst use of "logic" I've seen in awhile.
"There's some limited research merely mentioning what the chemical composition [of "electronic" cigarettes] is, but there's no systematic research assessing the overall safety of inhaling these chemicals deep into the lungs over an extended period."
---Either the doctor is in woefully misinformed or just flat lying.
Really, a pretty piss-poor "article". I usually respect BBC reporting, but this is as bad as Fox News. There's nothing to see here, move along.