US classification of vaping

[JustPuffin]

The category was created a long time ago and is practiced by millions of people. You just are breathing and sniffin from your mouth rather then breathing and sniffing it in the air. why should this essential oil be singled out from any of the others that contain nicotine?

New category just because it isn't listed.

 

[chief druid]

seriously .. kate you havent blocked me ??????? i'm shocked lol ....


justpuffin will block me eventually lol

 

[Kate]

Do you mean put you on my ignore list Druid? I haven't got anybody on that and believe me there are some people that really annoy me who should be on it

I've hardly read anything by you but you just seem a bit funny, not annoying.

 

[Kwiq Niss]

I think e-smoking itself is the equivalent of sitting in a room with a fog machine. If you consider the nicotine... That may be a different story
My point is that there is no reason to categorize it, just as there is no reason to categorize a fog machine. The only thing that might fit in a category is the nicotine, and it should go in the same category as nicorette and/or the patch.

 

[KoS]

I think it should be asociated with a herbal suplement juices so even if they ban the nic juice the hardware dosent follow like it is now.

 

[chief druid]

Do you mean put you on my ignore list Druid? I haven't got anybody on that and believe me there are some people that really annoy me who should be on it

I've hardly read anything by you but you just seem a bit funny, not annoying.

welling up over here ... no really i am annoying i never take anything seriously waaaaaa.... but your a person who could get me some 48 mg free to vape straight ... i'm more than happy to be a guinea pig waaaa

 

[Kate]

Lol ... I'll have some sent straight over

 

[chief druid]

i will vape anything .. i've tried vaping beer ... not good ... and various milkshakes ... ask frogbtm ......

 

[Slea]

Aye Slea, maybe so but personally I think if we're going to fight we should be true to ourselves and fight for what we really think is right.

Even if it's a losing battle at least we'll keep our integrity and won't have been led like sheep by profiteers and politicos.

You might be a better person than me.

 

[Kate]

... you might have more of a chance of getting what you hope for

 

[Kwiq Niss]

Lol ... I'll have some sent straight over

what's this about 48mg nic-juice?

 

[JustPuffin]

welling up over here ... no really i am annoying i never take anything seriously waaaaaa.... but your a person who could get me some 48 mg free to vape straight ... i'm more than happy to be a guinea pig waaaa

Dead guinea pig.

The human body can not tolerate more then 36 mg.
Though we VapePires might be the exception to the norm.

 

[JustPuffin]

I think it should be asociated with a herbal suplement juices so even if they ban the nic juice the hardware dosent follow like it is now.

You almost got it.
The answer is?

 

[Kate]

Bump.

Ruyan have said they don't sell tobacco products and have just come up with research that says their products aren't effective drugs either. I wonder if they're getting ready to argue their way out of tobacco and drug classifications. They're not daft and not short of money for legal advice.

 

[ZambucaLu]

I kinda liked when Lacey was pursuing the homeopathic classification....but that probably won't fly now

I agree that either drug or tobacco is only going to cause further problems, so I have to go with either new or uncategorized. Will have to think about this one some more

Lu

 

[katink]

Harm Reduction Smoking Alternative

 

[saintgadreel]

I'm going with new category, although I would like to see the actual devices excluded from classification since they don't HAVE to be used for drug delivery.

 

[Kate]

New Category and Uncategorised are the most prudent choices according to the poll.

Few people want to have vaping classed as drug or tobacco use.

I think that Smoking Everywhere might force a definition that says vaping products are not tobacco but I don't know if that will mean the FDA definition of drug combination will automatically be accepted as correct. Ideally they will be found to be wrong too.

 

[linnx]

Just call it a personal vaporizer. As another poster said, kind of like a nebulizer. And the purpose of it is for vaporizing flavored liquids. Not nicotine. I mean, you can buy bongs and crack pipes and they just label it for tobacco use. So why can't you buy a vaporizer labeled for inhalation of a flavorful liquid?

 

[Kate]

I think that would be ideal for the hardware - to be considered apart from the nicotine, that has got to be a serious possibility. Unfortunately the FDA and pro tobacco campaigners seem to be tying the hardware and nicotine together.

We may need another court case to remove tobacco or drug definitions from hardware after Smoking Everywhere is finished.