How do you figure that? They are running at a loss and have been for several years. They are paid by the federal government. The federal government's source of income is our tax dollars. So yes, our tax dollars do fund the USPS.
I actually see this as a bit of a positive. I hope the USPS can survive but being forced to pre fund their benefits now means it is one less thing my daughter and her children will have to pay for in the future. The only way to keep our children and the children from being saddled with enormous debt is for us to suck it up today and do what has to be done.
Mail 5 days a week is fine with me as are increases in fees. I want my grandchildren to be free of this huge burden of debt.
How do I figure? The USPS revenue is stamps and packages and services (PO boxes and whatnot). Not the federal government. The federal government does give money to USPS -- reimbursement for disabled services and mail delivery to our military/soldiers. I see that as money for our troops/extended SS for our disabled/blind Americans. I'm sure others don't see it that way.
Because of the pre-funding mandate, the USPS is forced to
borrow money from the treasury, to pay its 'debts' ... to the treasury. Those 'debts' are the payments that Congress is forcing it to make on behalf of people not even BORN yet.
It's really quite silly.
The USPS "bailout" would consist of loosening up the 75 year pre-payment requirement. It's not a bailout in the same
sense that we bailed out those banks. Other relief comes in the form of Congress not micro-managing the USPS, by letting the org makes its own restructuring and delivery decisions. Like we now have the impending 5 day per week delivery (works for me! some vapemail should still make it
through on Saturday! Yeah!).
Last time I checked, the money that USPS 'owes' is nothing compared to our national debt. Having the USPS pre-pay retirement money isn't going to make it any easier on our children/grandchildren. The USPS is not our problem. We have plenty of those.