That I am not.
And your purpose? Was is to just insult anyone who didn't stop smoking with Aroma's?
Last edited:
That I am not.
Yeah, I think my wife is about fed up with me being on the forum all day! I barely spent any real quality time with my 2 week old baby today. I feel terrible about feeling so good.Today is not yesterday and tomorrow will not be today!
hahaha! I don't know who here used the word "high?" Actually, nobody did, but that's cool to throw that in there. I am the one who spoke of the bed (and well, so did, oh never mind). I wrote this to clarify, and since one of my posts is important, this one should be too:
WTA should follow the spread. Making a liquid with no nicotine would not be WTA as the "W" in "WTA" stands for "Whole". I can't imagine anyone with a liquid containing only the minor alkaloid portion of the alkaloid spread... I know I couldn't make it and I wouldn't want to vape it.
The 30 mg WTA, which is pretty potent stuff, is 95% (28.5 mg/mL) in nicotine, and 5% (1.5 mg/mL) in all the other alkaloids combined.
You must not assume that the mg strength of WTA refers to just the minor alkaloids, it refers to the total alkaloid concentration, I.E. nicotine plus all the minor alkaloids. While WTA is mostly nicotine, the 5% other alkaloids is where the magic is.
edit:
To add something, one might ask, "Can't you then start with just nicotine and add the 5% other alkaloids to get WTA?". The answer is "No" for two reasons:
1. When you extract tobacco, you get 95% nicotine and 5% other alkaloids. Very sophisticated techniques could be used to separate the minor alkaloids from the nicotine, but this would be extremely involved and astronomically expensive. Far easier to extract WTA and simply dilute with PG/VG.
2. When you start messing with the product and changing it, it is no longer WTA. I define WTA as the UNMODIFIED alkaloid spread extracted from whole tobacco. I can do that 'cuz I created the term and I get to define it.![]()
And your purpose? Was is to just insult anyone who didn't stop smoking with Aroma's?
I would say no. Besides, the stuff would cost it's weight in gold.
edit:
Here's a quick example to show how 12 mg/mL and 24 mg/mL could contain the same amount of WTA, and it's not via adding pure minor alkaloids.
liquid 1:
9 mg/mL in WTA isolate and 3 mg/mL in nicotine, total alkaloid concentration = 12 mg/mL.
I would call this 12 mg/mL (75% WTA)
liquid 2:
9 mg/mL in WTA isolate and 15 mg/mL in nicotine, total alkaloid concentration = 24 mg/mL.
I would call this 24 mg/mL (37.5% WTA)
Both contain the same concentration of WTA, but different concentrations of nicotine. This also explains why you can buy 12 mg/mL for the same price as 24 mg/mL. You're paying for the WTA, the extra nicotine in the 24 mg version is free. Please note that the examples above do not correspond to how Aroma actually mixes their liquids, I don't know the actual recipe.
And your purpose? Was is to just insult anyone who didn't stop smoking with Aroma's?
And your purpose? Was is to just insult anyone who didn't stop smoking with Aroma's?
He can't promote or discuss his product here in this forum. He can stick up for his friends and people he admires, redrose....On another note however, what is disrespectful to everyone, is you Jerry, scolding me, on a forum you know is a violation for you to be posting in. Please don't use me as an excuse to do so. You may not scold me anywhere.
Then this ^ is what you should have said, isn't it?I have a tremendous respect for Dvap, always have. Which is why I was really disappointed to read this, "while Ethan might be catering to the mutants who would otherwise be taking nicotine on an IV drip." I felt it was a cheap shot at his customers, me being one, and truthfully, I expected better.
In that light, I don't see myself as being rude, but rather reacting to rude. I just read that wasn't your intent Dvap, tho I don't understand how else that would be taken. Perhaps if I understood a different reason for phrasing it that way, I might feel differently.
Hmm...Does Ethan need you to speak for him?Actually, no, I believe his quoting that, and his company name is very self-promoting. That's why he did it.
Dvap doesn't need Jerry to speak for him.
Hmm...Does Ethan need you to speak for him?
Although Dvap doesn't need anyone to speak for him, he has made many friends over the years here on ECF and it's almost inevitable that someone will have his back when he's not around.
Admittedly I am playing some catch up and the question I am about to ask may have already been answered ahead of my reading trail.
So the question is this:
How does some like Ethan, create a profile mix of liquids that vary in both nicotine and 'WTA'? Where is he getting 'modified' sources of the alkaloid? For example, I ordered some liquids (which I never ended up receiving) that were made up of 12 mg nic, medium WTA, 18 mg Nic with High WTA, 18 mg Nic with Xtra high WTA, and so on.
This makes complete sense.
So if anyone claims that they can have xtra high WTA in an x mg nicotine dosage then what they really are saying is that they are giving you an x mg (100% WTA) isolate and calling anything 'high' 'medium' or 'low' WTA is really just diluting the WTA isolate with pure non-WTA nicotine.
1. WTA Spiked into nicotine (WTA containing minor alkaloids and nicotine) plus more nicotine. This would result in a spread not in line with the natural spread, enhanced in nicotine. Nothing really wrong with this, I guess.
I am now betting you would take those words back if you could ha ha!
After two long drags, I put my pv down, sat back in my lounge chair and gazed out the window