'Vaper': E-cig users see them as a less-harmful alternative

[BuGlen]

A very good article that focuses on the words of vapers, instead of the people who have no clue making assumptions:
'Vaper': E-cig users see them as a less-harmful alternative | timesfreepress.com

* I had to look up this word in the article, so I figured I'd put it here for others to reference:

proselytize
1. To induce someone to convert to one's own religious faith.
2. To induce someone to join one's own political party or to espouse one's doctrine.
v.tr. - To convert (a person) from one belief, doctrine, cause, or faith to another.

 

[Vocalek]

Just think about the people who go door-to-door distributing copies of The Watchtower, or the handsome well-groomed young men who come to your door to tell you about the Book of Mormon.

NOTE: The picture caption annoys me.

Vintage Vapors employee Brandon White blows smoke from an e-cig.

1. Vapor is not smoke.
2. The substance is clearly exiting his nose, not coming out of the e-cig.
3. The caption gives the false impression that smoke is emitted directly from an e-cig into the surrounding area.
4. Bystanders are only exposed to exhaled vapor.
5. Several studies have shown that there are more chemicals in inhaled vapor than in exhaled vapor.

 

[Vocalek]

I disagree with this statement:

The FDA, which has done virtually nothing regarding e-cigs to date, is expected to issue some regulations regarding them in the coming months.

See E-cigarette History


Other than those nits, it is a pretty positive story. No quotes from the ANTZ, thank you.

 

[Uma]

Nice article!! I question the 6mls a week at 1 buck a ml quote though. An overall pattern shoulda coulda been used. The amounts are dictated by the heating element device used, and the price is subjective to where it's purchased.

Love love love that customized Reo!!! I want!!!