So the idea is to get vapers and vendors both together to find out which places allow indoor
vaping and which places dont. It should work like this:
Vendors create challenges for vapers (ex: ask 10 establishment owners in your area and see how they feel about indoor vaping. Add results to vapeout)
Vendors get to introduce them, you get free stuff, or stuff half priced. Win-win, right?!
When theres a threat to ban, we have your vaping stories ready to for you to send to your local government offices. Imagine thousands of vapers in Cerritos (theres moratorium on new shops) taking action against bans. How would they ignore those who elected them? Right?
And, those who defend in front of city council can show back at VapeOut that look, we are making this work, without you having to ban. Right?! That would be win-win-win WINNNNN? Thats at least in theory.
It might be difficult to grasp this at once, but imagine if at least half of those more than 4500 vendors in the US work together for the same goal and vapers too. Thats the best we could do to keep regulation as mild as possible. Because otherwise there will be someone else deciding for your rights and saying what you can or cannot do?
Does it make sense?