So, uh, anyway...
Hey, what did you Expect with the word "Hijack" in the Title?
So, uh, anyway...
Hey, what did you Expect with the word "Hijack" in the Title?
![]()
We have a thing called the NHS Here in the uk which is something you Americans don't have a free to every uk citizen health service that is payed for obviously by taxes.. Now I don't know the exact numbers but smoking related disease and deaths cost said nhs millions and millions every year the govt here wants to stop spending that money and spend it on something else so bans of ecigs won't happen here... Stupid ridiculous laws are being put in place like no tank over 2ml no nicotine above 24mg is to be sold taxing devices and eliquid making people have pharmaceutical licenses etc etc but that's so they can save money while still making it.... As I said before they allow advertisements of ecigs on tv to carry the advice you can use it indoors lol
We don't have states that can make their own laws either (not yet anyway) so things are slightly different here not better just different
This is one of the biggest fattest lies that has been put out there and has continued for years. The truth is that smokers COST LESS than healthy people. Why? Because they don't go to the doctor. When they do go to the doc, the problems just get blamed on smoking. the treatment for that is? Quit. Which costs the average taxpayer NOTHING. No diagnostics, no treatment, just QUIT SMOKING. Well then, either you quit and then they say "Oh, sorry, looks like you're still sick, now lets help you" or you don't quit and there is no extra cost and maybe you get better and maybe you die.
On the other side of that, its the old people that costs a fortune in healthcare. It's well known that you are far less likely to actually get old if you smoke. Smokers die sooner, before they reach the ages where healthcare costs skyrocket. You could argue otherwise, but then you loose your argument about smokers being sicker and having more diseases because you must be HEALTHY to get old.
Its been proven, over and over again (math and money are incapable of lying) that the taxes paid by smokers not only pay for their healthcare costs, but they also result in a HUGE net revenue to the government.
See the number below in my signature about money saved? 80% of that is taxes that the government couldn't collect on. They would be prosecuting us for theft if they could!
I've written up what happened more fully here: http://vaping.com/news/Vapers-Demolish-Anti-vaping-Lies-with-Hashtag-Hijack
And check out the thread on the campaign itself which is in the News forum: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...rrorists-launch-attack-against-vaping-sf.html
And that must be really nice, Withdrewandi. IMO, since everyone has their own preferences and needs, I'm sure no health system anywhere would ever be 100% "perfect", but as far as I can tell, health systems such as you have in the UK and what I have heard of Germany's (for examples), seem to overall be fairly excellent.That's such a shame luckily we have 1 of the best health care systems in the world I mean it has issues but we don't have to pay like you do yes we pay by means of tax but not by getting a bill every time we use it....
Yes we get told to quit but not come back when you have......
My point wasn't about that tho it was about the reasons ecigs won't be banned here yes they will be legislated and taxed but unlike cigarettes they can now advertise on tv advertise you can use them indoors not be kicked to a curb...
WTG everyone! This made my week.
My husband heard Slantz on the radio, declaring he's taking the curbit campaign throughout all of California not just sf. He said the old fart was careful enough to say that eCigs are saFER than smoking, but he stuck to his children cry that kids are being attracted to safer alternatives that may or may not have nicotine to which nicotine is no more addictive than caffeine... wait, I'm filling in the blanks. But, we humans know the truth.
Does San Francisco Bay Coffee support this current Affront to e-Cigarettes?
I don't care. I want to demonstrate to the TC extremists that vapers have zero tolerance for acts of terrorism. By hurting the SF economy we can get local businesses to push back against the SanFran cell of the TC terrorist network on their own turf.
..
Moral: don't blame government, blame the people who may be devoting massive resources to distorting the function of the government, in this case, as it has been before, most likely Big Tobacco *and the shareholders...
It's the nasty end of capitalism. Not nearly as bad as the good end everything else humans have tried but it is what it is. There's noone to blame because noone has figured out a better system.
This is one of the biggest fattest lies that has been put out there and has continued for years. The truth is that smokers COST LESS than healthy people.....
A better system is simple. Install a government with laws that bar corporate lobbying and campaign money, PAC's, etc. Severely limit personal campaign contributions (Koch brothers for example). Forbid political office holders from ever profiting from an entity their vote(s) ever benefited once they leave office. Place their financial investments in a blind trust as a condition of holding office.
Improbable but not impossible. It will probably require a revolution to get it done. Improbable because of the complacency of the vast majority of Americans. We didn't used to be that way.
Interesting... hmmm... ok, this is sort of what I had expected, somewhat. But also that we would be seeing similar campaigns in other places. Especially since they would go towards influencing public opinion on matters that are going to be big legislative issues this year.
So, speaking as "one of the hijackers". I'm sure most have heard or seen it but I'll repeat it here and feel free to share this with anyone you think might be interested;
"If you want to be part of a coordinated and planned response to the disinformation campaign currently being waged against you, as a business in this industry, by the San Francisco Tobacco Free Coalition, please contact me immediately at stefan [at] norcal.sfata.org as we are putting together a team and a plan and I would love you to be be part of that."
I already had quite a lot of responses and we are very seriously looking into a counter campaign. But one that is well thought out in a measured and appropriate response that would allow itself to be used as a template for other similar campaigns we're expecting to see. I'm actually quite pleased with the positive responses and support given how the past few months it felt like the entire industry and vaping communities were overtaken by apathy. Maybe I should send SF Tobacco Free and Glantz a thank you note for sparking a renewed positive fighting spirit at a time when we all needed it.
Disclaimer; while I'm routing this effort through NorCal SFATA and trying to organize a counter campaign, this is not solely a SFATA effort. But that's as much as I'll say about that at this time.
I'm just not sure how comfortable I am at Punishing someone who does Business in, or has the word, San Francisco in their DBA.
It will probably require a revolution to get it done. Improbable because of the complacency of the vast majority of Americans. We didn't used to be that way.
Freedom in the US is and always has been simply an illusion of freedom, now they aren't even pretending that we have that freedom anymore