Alrighty, time for another "Oliver's intermittent "let's freak everyone out" moments."
First, a question: how much time would you imagine it takes to ensure that videos posted here are family and work safe (although, admittedly, both those conditions depend on your family or your work)?
Well, ECF moderators vet every single video that's posted here for language. Even ones that are really, really boring (oh, yeah, there are some of those). They're watched through to ensure
And, I don't think that's sustainable, and I don't think the mods should be doing this, and it's going to be a while until there's an automated technology which does this for us (although it certainly will exist one day).
So, the mods and I decided we're going to stop this vetting...
But, here's the thing. It does do ECF a massive service. Removing bad language, it turns out, acts as a sort of quality filter (and, I'm sure it works both ways on that front). There's an inverse correlation between bad language and video quality. It's true that a few judicious cusses can enhance a quality video, but broadly speaking the rule stands. Dammit, If I did video there'd be more than an occasional f-bomb.
So, what do you think the ramifications might be? And how would we go about ending the video vetting while at the same time trying to stop bad quality videos being posted? All ideas greatly appreciated.
Oh, also - I don't think it would be sensible to just "pull" this policy. I'd like to autotag all embedded audio/video media with a note saying: "warning - not vetted, may contain language". But I'd like a tag that's funnier than that. Any ideas?
First, a question: how much time would you imagine it takes to ensure that videos posted here are family and work safe (although, admittedly, both those conditions depend on your family or your work)?
Well, ECF moderators vet every single video that's posted here for language. Even ones that are really, really boring (oh, yeah, there are some of those). They're watched through to ensure
And, I don't think that's sustainable, and I don't think the mods should be doing this, and it's going to be a while until there's an automated technology which does this for us (although it certainly will exist one day).
So, the mods and I decided we're going to stop this vetting...
But, here's the thing. It does do ECF a massive service. Removing bad language, it turns out, acts as a sort of quality filter (and, I'm sure it works both ways on that front). There's an inverse correlation between bad language and video quality. It's true that a few judicious cusses can enhance a quality video, but broadly speaking the rule stands. Dammit, If I did video there'd be more than an occasional f-bomb.
So, what do you think the ramifications might be? And how would we go about ending the video vetting while at the same time trying to stop bad quality videos being posted? All ideas greatly appreciated.
Oh, also - I don't think it would be sensible to just "pull" this policy. I'd like to autotag all embedded audio/video media with a note saying: "warning - not vetted, may contain language". But I'd like a tag that's funnier than that. Any ideas?