We have a new FDA Science leader!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

DonleyDoRight

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jun 20, 2009
196
42
66
Florida Panhandle
www.want2vape.com
Greetings all,
I subscribe to the FDA tobacco updates and this is what I received the other day.
I would not normally post this info but Dr. Ashley (kinda appropriate if you think about it) is now in charge and claims to have tobacco product science experience.
He is the first Director for the Office of Science for tobacco products. (see where I'm going here?)

He may be our best shot at asking (demanding) a review of the faulty testing and dis-information that the FDA released on E-Cigs last year. And may very well be the person to whom we demand REAL testing of e-Cigs and liquids.

I have no problem writing letters to our representatives but every time I do someone says I should of said this or that. So maybe a concerted effort to address this new development.

So I believe he should be at the top of our list in this months letter writing campaign.

I can't wait to see what this post will bring about from my immensely educated fellow forum members.

This is the email address where the update originates:
fda@service.govdelivery.com
And here is how you too can get FDA updates of your choosing:
https://service.govdelivery.com/service/user.html?code=USFDA


FDA Selection of Director, Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products




The Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has selected Dr. David L. Ashley (CAPT, USPHS) as the Center’s first Director for the Office of Science.

As a science-based and science-led Agency; science provides the foundation for our regulatory decisions and the work we do on a daily basis to promote and protect the nations' health. As the Director of Science, Dr. Ashley will provide leadership and management of many scientific domains including tobacco product science, tobacco product review, epidemiology and metrics, as well as social and behavioral sciences.

His leadership, coordination, and support will also be crucial for the scientific activities and advice from the Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee, establishment of tobacco product standards, integration of the public health/population health priority of CTP activities and coordination within the Office of Science.

Throughout his professional career, Dr. Ashley has performed research in the field of tobacco and developed specific expertise in determining the relationship between tobacco product design, contents, emissions, and biomarkers. His research has focused on the impact that the contents of tobacco products and design features such as ventilation and filter components have on the emissions from the product, how the product is used, and exposure of people who use the product or are exposed to second-hand smoke.

His depth of knowledge and expertise has led to his involvement as a member of the World Health Organization (WHO) Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation and as chair of WHO’s Tobacco Laboratory Network.

Prior to this role, Dr. Ashley worked his way up at the CDC from a bench scientist to chief of one of the largest branches in the agency. These positions gave him the skill and expertise needed to lead a scientific organization.

Dr. Ashley will join CTP in June after serving as the Chief of the Emergency Response and Air Toxicants Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the last decade.

In addition, Dr. Ashley has been the recipient of many awards during his federal career including numerous Public Health Service awards and the NCEH/ATSDR Director’s Award in 2009. Dr. Ashley received his Ph.D in Physical Chemistry from Emory University in 1982.
 

DonleyDoRight

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jun 20, 2009
196
42
66
Florida Panhandle
www.want2vape.com
No I think you're right.
and thank you for thinking.

But in light of e-Cigs now being classified as a tobacco product, Dr. Ashly would have to take another look and test them again. (IMO)
OR
Could stand by on cronyism and just agree with what was said before.

What do you think? I feel like I am grasping at straws with getting E-Cigs legalized. And any ray of hope is most welcome.
 

msqun

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 12, 2010
553
8
MS
www.facebook.com
Good thinking - and thanks for posting. It will be interesting to see if anyone has any background on Dr. Ashley.

WHO | TFI Selects Chair and Vice Chair to the WHO Tobacco Laboratory Network (TobLabNet)

ONE article about him and his research and role in tobacco research.
I am too new to post links so, if you just google him as Dr. David L. Ashley then you can find that article.

Here is his BIO from WHO:
David L. Ashley, PhD
•PhD, Physical Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1982
•Captain, United States Public Health Service
•Research Scientist, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1983-1988
•Chief, Emergency Response and Air Toxicants Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, since 1998
•Directs a branch of 70 scientists with a diverse public health mission
•Extensive research experience related to biomarkers of exposure of environmental toxic agents, particularly volatile organic compounds
•Published over 100 peer-reviewed articles and book chapters related to biomarkers of exposure and the constituents of tobacco and tobacco smoke
•Presented extensively at scientific meetings on the chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke and biomarkers of exposure
•Contributing Author for the upcoming Surgeon General's Report entitled How Tobacco Causes Disease--The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Tobacco-Attributable Disease

Related Links
- WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg)
- TobReg Group Members
 
Last edited:

DonleyDoRight

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Jun 20, 2009
196
42
66
Florida Panhandle
www.want2vape.com
I believe Dr. Ashley will either be our biggest supporter or our worst enemy.
We have till June when he takes over to come up with a plan to make contact with him.

I also believe we should give him the utmost respect (till proven otherwise) as he can make life very difficult for us if we should offend.

There is no doubt in my mind that he probably already has his mind set either fore or against e-Cigs, but I would think that he would have to re-test them before making any public comment, stand or ruling. Since they are now classified as a tobacco product.

We need a leader here to moderate this thread and gather thoughts on how to proceed, whether it's CASAA, ECA or one of us.

Time to test the collaborative ECF brain trust now. We are strong together!
 

trailblazer6

A.K.A. Igor the Vapaholic
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 23, 2010
281
57
69
Lakewood , NJ
www.bikerornot.com

Good one Rosa, if only:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Personally, I suspect Dr Ashly is just another one of managements puppets. Public safety and truth in science be damned. It's all about the money. Just look at all the so called safe meds that are not safe at all and the possible side effects 8-o
 
Last edited:

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
On the plus side, it sounds as if Dr. Ashley has a lot of knowledge about the substances found in tobacco smoke.

The American Lung Association is recommending that folks not use e-cigarettes (i.e., just keep smoking tobacco) until e-cigarettes are proven "safe." Is that good advice or bad advice? While waiting for the FDA stamp of safety on e-cigarettes, would an extra year or two (or 10 -- or forever) of smoking do any damage to the lungs? To the cardiovascular system? Cause cancer?

It stands to reason that what is needed is a scientific head-to-head comparison of the substances delivered by smoke to the substances delivered by vapor. Which is the safer substance to inhale? e.g. Is it better to inhale 8,000 ng or 8 ng of nitrosamines a day--(NOTE: Those are the quantities found in the tobacco itself and in the liquid; what are the quantities that make it into the smoke and into the vapor?)

Are there additional carcinogens and toxins in vapor? Name and quantify them. Are there addtional carcinogens and toxins in smoke? Name and quantify them. Are there any other harmful substances (e.g. tar) found in smoke that are not found in vapor, and vice-versa? Dr. Ashley might be a good person to lead this inquiry.

In addition to toxicology studies, we need data on people. There are enough experienced users now to to a restrospective study of people who have been inhaling vapor for 6 months or longer. What have the effects been on their health? It looks as if this might be outside Dr. Ashley's expertise. What's needed in this second area of study is an expert in public health research and evaluation.
 
Last edited:

Tom09

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 22, 2009
504
125
Germany
You don’t make carrier in any field if you are off mainstream. Ashley is high profile in the US-dominated tobacco research and control league. Regarding e-cigs, I don’t think that there is much that can be expected from him. He was among the 13 members of the TobReg panel that opted to snuff out e-cigs, recently. Some reply to TobReg’s ‘recommendations’ - recommendations based on the ignorance of scientific evidence - had just been made by Laugesen (open file TobRegCritique.doc). Well, compared to Henningfield, Ashley appeares to be less willing to take it up as his personal issue in public. Sure contact, but don’t expect too much in return.
 

Mister

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 3, 2009
523
27
Nanaimo BC Canada
You don’t make carrier in any field if you are off mainstream. Ashley is high profile in the US-dominated tobacco research and control league. Regarding e-cigs, I don’t think that there is much that can be expected from him. He was among the 13 members of the TobReg panel that opted to snuff out e-cigs, recently. Some reply to TobReg’s ‘recommendations’ - recommendations based on the ignorance of scientific evidence - had just been made by Laugesen (open file TobRegCritique.doc). Well, compared to Henningfield, Ashley appeares to be less willing to take it up as his personal issue in public. Sure contact, but don’t expect too much in return.
The bizarre thing is that the first person in a position with as much influence as he has on this subject who does take it on as an agenda will be viewed by history as someone who saved millions of lives.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread