He went full on company man and a huge sell out his early video's were great but you can tell when it all changed
I stopped watching him a long time ago so I don't know when he changed.He went full on company man and a huge sell out his early video's were great but you can tell when it all changed
maybe, but I doubt Home Depot would have the competition model.
But this is YouTube we're talking about...completely unforgiving, and ruled by Like/Subscribe Whores. It is in fact, a den of intellectual inequity akin to daytime TV or dare I say, Facebook. Nothing that happens on it can be suppressed. Actually, that's a good thing, but it's also just a bit creepy. Anything you post, there's always someone out there who's gonna record it. If Rip didn't realize before how vicious his playmates in that sandbox are, he probably learned a valuable lesson....but he did take the video down... within 24 hours.
The people, threads and vape shows that republish the video and continue to perpetuate the narrative are as guilty of the "crime" (in the context of harming the vape community with making negative health claims), as they claim RiP to be.
Time to bury this drama..
JM2C
Vape onnn...
...but he did take the video down... within 24 hours.
The people, threads and vape shows that republish the video and continue to perpetuate the narrative are as guilty of the "crime" (in the context of harming the vape community with making negative health claims), as they claim RiP to be.
Time to bury this drama..
JM2C
Vape onnn...
...but he did take the video down... within 24 hours.
The people, threads and vape shows that republish the video and continue to perpetuate the narrative are as guilty of the "crime" (in the context of harming the vape community with making negative health claims), as they claim RiP to be.
Time to bury this drama..
JM2C
Vape onnn...
The only drama I noticed was the reaction to what Rip did not in what he...but he did take the video down... within 24 hours.
The people, threads and vape shows that republish the video and continue to perpetuate the narrative are as guilty of the "crime" (in the context of harming the vape community with making negative health claims), as they claim RiP to be.
Time to bury this drama..
JM2C
Vape onnn...
The only drama I noticed was the reaction to what Rip did not in what he
did for whatever reason he did it. a product reviewer reviewing a product
is not exactly front page news.
Regards
mike
I watched the video. Aside from the fact that reviewing said product and notDid you watch the actual Video?
Did you understand the Fact he was Pedaling a Branded product and claiming Not to be Pedaling a Branded Product?
A Clear FCC Violation
Could simply have Been Stress and poor health management:
Cortisol — Its Role in Stress, Inflammation, and Indications for Diet Therapy
10 Signs You Have WAY Too Much Cortisol | Lissa Rankin
I often wonder how many Sick new Vapers are simply dealing with the Stress of making the Switch
A Healthy Mental outlook goes a long way toward healing.(especially in dealing with stress)
We have medical Professionals for Good Reason![]()
I watched the video. Aside from the fact that reviewing said product and not
selling said product what specific FCC regulation is Rip in violation of considering
it's not broadcast media and there theoretically is no compensation involved.
Stressed or not any one who got there undies in a bunch over Rips lame attempts
at product reviews and or placement whether commercial or not has issues that
are probably best not handled on the internet by hack like me.
There is simply no there,there. Take my word for it. There are a lot of more
important things to waste emotional baggage on. I personally can not muster
the effort to post a imaginary face palm emoticon here.( )
Regards
Mike
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I watched the video. Aside from the fact that reviewing said product and not
selling said product what specific FCC regulation is Rip in violation of considering
it's not broadcast media and there theoretically is no compensation involved.
Stressed or not any one who got there undies in a bunch over Rips lame attempts
at product reviews and or placement whether commercial or not has issues that
are probably best not handled on the internet by hack like me.
There is simply no there,there. Take my word for it. There are a lot of more
important things to waste emotional baggage on. I personally can not muster
the effort to post a imaginary face palm emoticon here.( )
Regards
Mike
I watched the video. Aside from the fact that reviewing said product and not
selling said product what specific FCC regulation is Rip in violation of considering
it's not broadcast media and there theoretically is no compensation involved.
Stressed or not any one who got there undies in a bunch over Rips lame attempts
at product reviews and or placement whether commercial or not has issues that
are probably best not handled on the internet by hack like me.
There is simply no there,there. Take my word for it. There are a lot of more
important things to waste emotional baggage on. I personally can not muster
the effort to post a imaginary face palm emoticon here.( )
Regards
Mike
The FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising are guidelines designed to help advertisers of all stripes – TV, print, radio, blogs, word-of-mouth marketing
" The Guides are not regulations, and so there are no civil penalties associated with them. But if advertisers don’t follow the guides, the FTC may decide to investigate whether the practices are unfair or deceptive under the FTC Act."And apologies, I should have said, and meant - FTCJust saying
In fact, after 28 days of inhalation exposure, no systemic effects were seen up to 200 mg/kg(highest dose tested, corresponding to a plasma Cmax of 137.6 mg/dL). Moreover, in the 7-day inhalation study in rats, no effects were observed up to the highest dose tested, i.e. 41.0 mg/L and corresponding to plasma
Cmax of 350.8 mg/dL.
There
was no effect on lung, liver, kidney, brain and heart weight nor any macroscopic findings reported.
Histopathological examination of the respiratory tract, liver, kidneys and heart of controls and high
dose animals revealed an increased incidence of minimal to mild squamous metaplasia of the
epiglottis in all treated animals (1/10, 13/18, 16/19 and 13/14 at 0, 1000, 1930, and 3910 mg/m3,
respectively).