Most of those are due to the high cost, no the addiction to tobacco.
if they werent addicted im sure they could have waited til the next morning for the store to open
Most of those are due to the high cost, no the addiction to tobacco.
if they werent addicted im sure they could have waited til the next morning for the store to open
I guess they didn't bother to read in those links I posted. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it think.
Andria
As someone who has struggled with a real opiate addiction (legally prescribed to me) I can promise you all that nicotine is nowhere near "the most addictive substance known to man". Anyone who thinks it is has clearly never experience the effects of a real addiction.
LOL, they don't want the store to be open, that's the point, they want it for free.
Is it really a contest? Yes, some addictions are stronger than others. I for one believe Nicotine is one of the strongest. Just because the withdrawal effects of opiates are violent doesnt mean its a worse addiction.
There is absolutely no denying that the nature of nicotine withdrawals is just a tiny, silent fart in a howling hurricane compared to withdrawals from hard drugs.
Your experience runs counter to the vast majority of people who have been vaping for years.and for some reason im more addicted to nicotine with vaping than with smoking so its not the tobacco, its the nicotine.
Hmmm... tobacco studies... Imagine that.Nicotine is addictive -- period. Only on the internet would you find anyone disputing this. I'll think back to my Master's level neuroscience classes to see if I can explain this. We all know opiates are addictive. They are because we have opiod receptors in our brains, as part do our own natural opiod-based system, endorphins and enkephalins. We cannot become addicted to any chemical for which we do not have receptors, since by definition, physiological addiction requires receptors "crying out" for the substance, which produces withdrawal symptoms.
Our muscular system is primary run by a cholinergic system. The neurotransmitter responsible for muscular contraction is acetylcholine. The receptors for ACH are called nicotinergic/muscitinergic receptors. (Spelling might be a bit off, it's been a while.) So, our brains and our bodies are full of little receptors crying out for both ACH & once exposed to nicotine -- nicotine. All physiological withdrawal symptoms are caused by empty receptors, demanding to be sated by the presence of the chemical.
However, we have a SET number of opiod receptors. We will have the same number from birth to death. The crucial difference with nicotine ("one of the most addictive substances know to man" moniker is due to this) is that the number of receptors is PLASTIC, not static. So, once a person has exposed themselves to nicotine, the number of receptors in their brains PERMANENTLY increases! When a person quits, these receptors are not all happy about it & withdrawal symptoms result. When the person remains unexposed to nicotine for a period of time, essentially the receptors "get used to it" and calm down.
But, the "demon nicotine" is in the details. The former smoker will ALWAYS have more receptors for nicotine than a never-smoker. That explains "Puff away from a pack a day." ONE exposure to nicotine is enough for the smoker to relapse.
That's just fact, neuroscience. No other chemical causes a permanent increase in receptors. .... & other psychoactive chemicals produce dependency in other ways, but only nicotine changes the brain in that specific way.
Be wary of articles with "propaganda" in the tile, be wary of anyone who is stating something so illogical as "nicotine is not addictive" since we ALL KNOW, only 5% of "quits" succeed & we all have personal experience with scrounging around, smoking buts... Most of us have tried & failed to quit, many times...
Where are the studies? Well, this meta-analysis by the NIH, the WHO & the CDC alone, quotes 855 papers. Anyone questioning "where is the research?" Certainly hasn't looked very hard
Nicotine Addiction: Past and Present - How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease - NCBI Bookshelf
At least I can agree with that....and for some much more than others
Obviously the results of small studies often aren't replicated in larger studies, but at least nicotine certainly looks safe. And we've seen absolutely no withdrawal symptoms. There doesn't seem to be any abuse liability whatsoever in taking nicotine by patch in non-smokers. That's reassuring.
No withdrawal symptoms suggesting nicotine addiction have been reported either after 46 weeks of therapy in short-term studies, or after a period of up to 6 months in the only long-term study available.
There is absolutely no denying that the nature of nicotine withdrawals is just a tiny, silent fart in a howling hurricane compared to withdrawals from hard drugs.
But it's pretty hard to know for sure when almost all of the research done over the last few decades has conflated nicotine with smoking.
Recent studies are showing never-smokers using nicotine for various treatments are NOT getting addicted at all...
Hmmm... tobacco studies... Imagine that.
I've been addicted. Barbituates, uppers, downers, halucinogens, alcohol, you name it. One thing that was common with all of them was a painful withdrawal. Same thing that happened when I switched to e-cigs. I went through withdrawal while vaping it like I stole it. Tobacco was my hardest quit. By far. Not nearly as painful as the rest... just the most difficult to abstain.
One thing that's different about vaping. I can go several hours without NEEDING to absolutely right now stop everything and partake Immediately.
So maybe. Just maybe. The 855 TOBACCO studies and products abound produced, poisoned and marketed by BT and BP have absolutely no baring on the truth of the addictive nature of nicotine... just nicotine.
It's been my experience and the experience of countless others on this very forum. Look for yourself. There are countless stories of folks lowering and even eliminating their nic levels after the initial withdrawal and a reasonable adjustment period. That's simply not how addiction works. It doesn't let you go slowly. It pulls you in.
For the record I've witnessed plenty of people steel for cigarettes.
I choose to believe what has proven true for me. If you can't feel and know the difference that is your own problem to deal with. Nobody needs a master's thesis to understand that.
It really depends on the person, and other conditions they may have, especially depression/anxiety. And, it's far more relevant to *smoking cessation* than *nicotine cessation* -- smoking cessation withdrawal can be pretty awful, but nicotine withdrawal is more like caffeine withdrawal; uncomfortable, but not agony.
Andria
A perfect example. Testify!My last quit, I was "vaping like I stole it" on 10mg nicotine, all I can handle without nausea, and after ten days of that with zero cravings, STILL began experiencing the most godawful cravings; I'd try the distraction method, chain vaping, eating, chocolate, caffeine, every last thing I could think of, but it simply could not get in front of my brain telling me, every minute, "smoke Smoke SMOKE NOW!" So, I added WTA -- the trace alkaloids and tobacco-MAOIs. The cravings went completely away and have not returned. Which tells me, it wasn't the nicotine; I was getting plenty of that -- it was most likely the MAOIs.
Andria