Why Vapers are getting a BAD NAME.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
I contend that most people who answer "huh? or shrug when asked about vaping in public would vote no when presented with a ballot with a yes/no choice about public vaping because of the misinformation fed to them by the media and government. I believe the chance of this greatly increases if that person has had a run in with one "rude" vaper because they lose nothing by voting no and gain nothing by voting yes.

Good points. Though if voter is a vaper or knows a vaper, then the misinformation is likely treated as misinformation and the vote is likely changed to a yes.

Here in Wisconsin, we went in the direction of exempting it from smoking bans. Or at very least proposing that. I'm guessing our state hearing was like other state hearings seeking a ban on vaping in public. Same type of speakers conveying same kind of information with a different end goal pre-determined. If you are reading this and your state hasn't tried to ban this, then it would be good to become proactive and seek the exemption. The more states going in that direction could influence the general population of non-vapers to consider it in a light other than "ban first, ask questions, seek science later."

As others on this thread have noted, as well as myself, all non-vapers that I meet regularly have literally zero issue with my vaping around them. Not just, I think they have no issue. But I have asked, and asked again, and triple checked over time. And it remains as zero issue. That says something. That when exposed to it, and immersed in secondhand vapor situation it is not bothersome to many. I would contend that is true with the vast majority. But alas, we may never know if the 'ban first, ask questions later' crowd gets to pre-determine the end goal.
 

aikanae1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2013
8,423
26,259
az
I should have also added that although it may take years to come to a conclusion, the headlines created before hand = free advertising and publicity. It also puts ANTZ on notice to clean up their act. The bad news is this lumps ecigs in with BT and the impression that vaping is subsitute for declining cig sales tends to do more harm with suspicious non-smokers.

I would imagine using federal funds illegally is a challenge BT could tackle. I kinda wonder why they haven't - except maybe their hands are dirty too? Just guessing.

I think the #IMPROOF campaign could be highly effective.

And I think this video illustrates the most effective tool we have so far (I'm posting it everywhere, so excuse me if you've seen it already);

 
Nice. That's a great start. Vapers need to understand complacency will result is the banning of vaping wherever tobacco is banned.

We have to do the same thing with offroad motorcycling. There is always a segment of the population that thinks they know better than everybody else and they are actively trying to stop whatever it is you enjoy doing. I don't care what it is. They are against it. LOL.

Good luck WA state. We're gonna need it here too in CA.
 
The whole "vape anywhere" attitude will be the undoing of ecigs.

I've vaped since 2009..if someone blew a cloud around my child, I'd say something..Especially in a doc's office. WTH? That's pretty douchey imo.

As a matter of fact, I think not saying anything to someone that is doing something along these lines is..well- cowardly.

Go vape in the bathroom/hallway/elevator/outside..where ever. Point being, people are never going to accept folks blowing clouds of vape in certain places. Period.

You can be as militant about vaping as you want..but your "habit" shouldn't invade other's space. When it does, don't be shocked to hear about it from them.

edit:lol at Mr. Doughnuts..peace out

I agree, I've only been vaping for about 2 months now, but I agree there's a time and place to vape. I won't do it in stores, restaurants, ect. Just because there's no second-hand smoke or nasty smell doesn't mean everybody will be fine with it, especially because the media is going crazy about under age kids being able to buy them just because there is no nicotine. Besides it's not that big of a deal to WAIT 5 minutes just so you can take a quick hit off your ecig. They're supposed to be a "safer alternative" to smoking cigarettes, not make smoking in your doctor's office acceptable.

That's my 2 cents, spend it wisely.:D
 

Berylanna

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
2,043
3,287
south Bay Area, California
www.facebook.com
I agree, I've only been vaping for about 2 months now, but I agree there's a time and place to vape. I won't do it in stores, restaurants, ect. Just because there's no second-hand smoke or nasty smell doesn't mean everybody will be fine with it, especially because the media is going crazy about under age kids being able to buy them just because there is no nicotine. Besides it's not that big of a deal to WAIT 5 minutes just so you can take a quick hit off your ecig. They're supposed to be a "safer alternative" to smoking cigarettes, not make smoking in your doctor's office acceptable.

That's my 2 cents, spend it wisely.:D

Does that mean you'd feel awful drinking a cup of hot coffee around a child? (I admit I would not vape in a pediatrics waiting room but I routinely stealth vape in all other types of Dr. offices.)

Edit: please note: I would NOT eat an egg MacMuffin in a pediatrics office. Two reasons.

1. Little kids often have a raft of allergies they'll soon outgrow, so doing something to the air in an ENCLOSED space where babies HAVE to be taken is just something that can be avoided. I DO vape in the large basement with my grandchildren, 2 and 4 years old. Or the (large) living room. With permission from their parents.

2. New parents are often running scared, I was terrified of any unknowns for the first 5 years of motherhood. We do not need Moms as enemies any more than we should get between a mama bear and her cubs even if WE know we aren't harming her cubs.



Not telling people is the RIGHT thing to do if they are strangers. Blowing a cloud does not count as not telling somebody. But realizing I've been vaping near them and they didn't notice, is quite educational for the average person.
 
Last edited:

LDS714

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 27, 2013
1,562
3,212
65
Nashville, TN, USA
I agree, I've only been vaping for about 2 months now, but I agree there's a time and place to vape. I won't do it in stores, restaurants, ect. Just because there's no second-hand smoke or nasty smell doesn't mean everybody will be fine with it, especially because the media is going crazy about under age kids being able to buy them just because there is no nicotine. Besides it's not that big of a deal to WAIT 5 minutes just so you can take a quick hit off your ecig. They're supposed to be a "safer alternative" to smoking cigarettes, not make smoking in your doctor's office acceptable.

That's my 2 cents, spend it wisely.:D

OK, not everybody will be fine with it.

But...

What if not everybody will be fine with not doing it?

Oh no! SOMEONE will be either uncomfortable or offended no matter which way you go! Time for heads to explode!

It's not smoking. And it hurts no one. Why don the shame that's been taught smokers? Second class citizenship for vapers also? I think it will be if we accept it.
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
I'd quote post #1086 for the third time in a row, but I think all following along are aware of what it says. Same type of post as about 15 other posts in this super long thread.

One side saying, "those vapers who do it everywhere are why we all won't be allowed to do it anywhere." The other side saying, "those vapers who won't do it anywhere and saying 'neither should you' are why usage bans are oh so easy and magically popping up with little or no resistance to them."

Either way, as a community, we are pretty much telling the general public that you need not worry, we vapers got this covered in terms of who's responsible for why vaping stopped occurring in public sometime around early 2014.

For me, the "etc" (though written as "ect") in post 1086 is the teeny tiny little part in the post that makes world of difference. Cause all these thoughtful/considerate vapers who won't do it in x, y and z places probably have own exceptions as to where it must be allowed, i.e. outside, or on own property, or wherever. Cause, you know, it's legal to vape, and therefore they, or we, have a right to do it in some places, legally.

But just think, some vapers may disagree with you. That even on your own property, or in your own car, or for sure outside (in public) it ought not be allowed. I mean if you don't smoke in your own car, or don't smoke inside your own house, or don't smoke at an outdoor public place, then really you have no argument for why you should be allowed to vape in those places. From a certain vaper's perspective, your insistence to do it in these places is precisely what is giving vaping a bad name. In your own space is arguably the worse, cause that's where you are likely building up some sort of habit that turns vaping into an addiction and then from there who knows where you'll want to vape. So, really, let's just take off the 'on your own property' as an okay place to vape. If there is children present there, or ever will be (think about THV), then your own property is a place not to vape, if you care about society.

So, fellow vapers, who think posts like 1086 make sense, please feel free to educate the vaping community as to where it is okay to vape, and some hyper sensitive vaper, will come along and let you know precisely why it is not okay to do it there and why it must absolutely not be allowed. We'll be sure to let you know how your use is hurting the larger vaping community and working against everyone.

Me, and a bunch of other fellow vapers, will continue to advocate for vape everywhere in the hopes that this 2014 battle isn't the end to vaping as we know it, or once knew it.

Ban its usage from most everywhere, and really, what is the argument for needing to get this stuff online, when general public will observe that it can be bought at B&M stores, in face to face transactions that prohibit children from buying them. You think non vapers, or the media, will care '2 cents' about whether or not you can get stuff online? You think non-vapers, or the media, will care at all about what flavors are allowed to be made? I mean you were happy as a smoker with tobacco or menthol as only flavor choices, why do you need any more than that? Big old tobacco pipes have been around forever, but you chose cigarettes instead, and therefore cigalikes ought to be good enough for you going forward. Curious why you would argue differently, unless it is simply about "me me me" and not caring that children could be sensitive to big old mod devices and the (third hand) vapor they produce.

Boy, am I glad there are vapers who are way more politically aware than those who float these things out there and don't seem to consider how much they are willfully assisting the opposition that is doing everything possible, including mass deception, to decimate the eCig industry.
 

Berylanna

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 13, 2012
2,043
3,287
south Bay Area, California
www.facebook.com
Boy, am I glad there are vapers who are way more politically aware than those who float these things out there and don't seem to consider how much they are willfully assisting the opposition that is doing everything possible, including mass deception, to decimate the eCig industry.

I blame a LOT of this on lack of SCIENTIFIC awareness.

Most vapers STILL don't know that EVERYTHING in e-cigs is FDA-APPROVED FOR SECOND-HAND INHALING anywhere there can be hot food.

Most vapers STILL don't know that you get more nicotine from eating 2 oz potatoes than from being locked in a room with vapers for 10 hours.

Tobacco is a "nightshade" plant. So are tomatoes and potatoes. Not sure about eggplant and chilis. These plants are so-closely related that I've seen warnings on gardening forums for smokers to wash their hands before working with their tomato plants, ESPECIALLY if they use cigar or pipe tobacco, because there is a famous Nightshade-family blight called Tobacco Mosaic Virus that can kill tomato plants, and is carried on tobacco leaves.
 

k75srider

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 9, 2014
87
52
Stevens Point WI
I work at a company that lumped ecigs in with a company wide smoking ban. I still have to leave the property to vap. There was no logic in this, though he will push Starbucks coffee on all employees. The next time he shows for a monthly meeting I will ask him what his logic was, with the upmost of the respect that he deserves .
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Ban its usage from most everywhere, and really, what is the argument for needing to get this stuff online, when general public will observe that it can be bought at B&M stores, in face to face transactions that prohibit children from buying them. You think non vapers, or the media, will care '2 cents' about whether or not you can get stuff online? You think non-vapers, or the media, will care at all about what flavors are allowed to be made? I mean you were happy as a smoker with tobacco or menthol as only flavor choices, why do you need any more than that? Big old tobacco pipes have been around forever, but you chose cigarettes instead, and therefore cigalikes ought to be good enough for you going forward. Curious why you would argue differently, unless it is simply about "me me me" and not caring that children could be sensitive to big old mod devices and the (third hand) vapor they produce.
There is an old saying about giving an inch and they take a mile.

I would like to use that saying to simplify what Jman8 is saying here, if I may...

The giving of an inch is standing idly by while they ban vaping here, or there, or anywhere.
The inch has been given, and now the public understands clearly that vaping is harmful to bystanders.

I mean, that's clearly why it was banned, right?
Nobody in their right mind would ban it for any other reason, right?

So there's your inch, now for the mile...

Since it's banned there, and obviously harmful, it should be banned here too.
And there as well, and over there too.

I mean, we did that with smoking when we "found out" that it was "harmful" to bystanders, right?
Clearly this needs to be done with vaping, since we have that inch, and we obviously and clearly are going to need that mile.


Boy, am I glad there are vapers who are way more politically aware than those who float these things out there and don't seem to consider how much they are willfully assisting the opposition that is doing everything possible, including mass deception, to decimate the eCig industry.
Quoted for truth.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Anytime we let them treat vaping the same as smoking, we've given up at least a few inches.

Here's what you can expect to see in the coming mile...
--No vaping in public parks
--No vaping at the beach
--No vaping anywhere on a college campus
--No flavors other than tobacco and MAYBE menthol
--No online sales
--Taxes for days and days

And if the future of vaping mirrors the future of smoking...
--No vaping in your car with children present?
--No vaping in your home if it adjoins another unit?
--Much higher insurance premiums?
--NO JOB FOR YOU!!

The time for a wake call has long since passed.
 

JimmyLee

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
  • Deleted by sonicdsl
  • Reason: Please do not cross post - this is already in the Legislative Forum

blueGrassTubb

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 21, 2014
1,223
824
The Bluegrass
I started vaping about 6 months ago; I am now completely winged off "Analog" cigarettes. I am glad that there is a Safer alternative to smoking, but I always hear and see complaints about E cigarette users. Now I treat my E-Cig as I would if it were a "Analog", I don't smoke in Walmarts or in Restaurants, because even though it's not a "Real" cigarette I find it disrespectful to others around you (Who don't smoke).

Getting to my story, today I took my 2 month old son and daughter (Twins) for their check up and shots. Me and my girlfriend were sitting in the lobby with around 5 other people with their children and infants with them. I noticed this woman sitting across the room bringing her jacket pocket up to her mouth (trying to be sneaky I guess), and exhaled a big plume of Vapor.

I of course got extremely POed, and said something to the woman, how it was disrespectful with all these Infants sitting within 10 feet of her "Vaping".

I just think it's crazy how disrespectful some people get with the whole "It's not a real cigarette, so I can smoke it when and where I want".

I openly vaped in the delivery room while my wife was giving birth. The docs and nurses thought it was awesome and asked for all kinds of information in order to pass it on to others. They were genuinely excited to see a safe alternative.
 

Baldr

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 14, 2011
1,391
1,671
Dallas, Tx
You misspelled "alternative that may be safe."

Compared to the *known* risks that cigarettes have, vaping is very safe.

If you are setting the standard as "must be 100% safe", then nothing on earth qualifies. Water is essential for life, but people still drown. Very few people can say they never use any type of automobile, but auto accidents still cause a lot of deaths.
 

Baldr

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 14, 2011
1,391
1,671
Dallas, Tx
Not at all. It may be 100% safe. Or it may not. That's the point. We don't know. And so vaping in a hospital, much less a delivery room, and declaring it "safe" .., almost incomprehensible

If you can't show any evidence it isn't save, then when you claim it isn't safe, I'm likely to point out that you are lying.

And as I pointed out before, nothing is 100% safe. I'd bet big money that you've been in an automobile in the last week, but auto accidents happen all the time. You're holding vaping to a higher standard than everything else in the world.
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
And so vaping in a hospital, much less a delivery room, and declaring it "safe" .., almost incomprehensible.

LOL, the bolded part isn't even what was said.

No wonder it is (almost) incomprehensible for you.

"Docs and nurses thought it was awesome" to vape in delivery room.
(Alleged) fellow vaper thinks it is incomprehensible.

Upside down world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread