Would you join an organized movement of vapers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
I think the best approach would be for liquid companies to protect their businesses. They are the ones that should be funding the battle and hirring lobbyist. I'm not about to help fund some group that will do whatever they want with collections they receive, like pay themselves big salaries and buy first class tickets so they can go rub elbows.

I understand where your coming from with your idea but that type of action needs funding by the manufactures not people or private small businesses cause that will never work.

I don't disagree that oversight and accountability are big issues. However, I'd argue that everyone has a stake in this. Also, if only juice companies took on this issue, there won't be a whole lot of funding. When you say small private businesses, I'm curious about what you mean. Excluding B&Ms that make their own juice, I can't imagine that most juice companies are very big. Maybe I'm wrong, but even the more popular ones are relatively small and wouldn't be able to do it all on their own.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
In my business experience I learned the more organizations there are for an industry, the more fragmented the ideas become. One group may be about the business side, promotion of standards and/or let's face it, profits, where another may be firmly focused on the consumer and yet another may be firmly opposed and focused on keeping all away from their town/state/children/pets - whatever. The most successful "movements' in US history focused on one very narrow idea. Civil Rights. Women's suffrage. End a war.

If somehow everyone could agree about and be passionate about one idea that is easily understood by all, you might have something. Otherwise, sorry to say, it's just another organization where several already exist.

No doubt. I can see from these boards and the opinions of people I meet in shops that most are opposed to any regulation on any level. However, people and businesses involved in these issues would have to understand that you don't always get exactly what you want and that lobbyist group may have to advocate positions that are a middle ground. It's a vexing problem, but one that could potentially make or break this part of the industry.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
The profits are enormous in the liquid industry and some of them are already ran by larger companies. Don't be fooled the funding is there if needed. Donations made by our local vape shops or us will equate to nothing.

Really? I didn't think that the market had grown that much already. Do you think that these companies have enough capital to back a large lobbyist group with some weight to throw around? It would be awesome if someone did a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the market.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
So, would you support the regulation? If these juice vendors have that much capital, they can probably survive the application process. Then we would at least have some list of ingredients, warning labels, deterrents for sales to minors, ect. Granted, the question I have about the hardware manufactures and B&Ms that make their own juice remain, but is it possible that the good outweighs the bad?
 

sub4me

Moved On
Aug 31, 2014
1,295
663
USA
I don't think RT bought into JC to start making cig a likes. That company is all about selling liquid and their very serious about it. Their facility is no joke its a solid profit making business.

Take a look at Halo, extremely successful business. Halo also has a huge investment in the game and just bought themselves a giant facility in Florida their on the edge of something that's about to take off way beyond what we are seeing now.

Online only vendors are everywhere and I wouldn't consider them reliable. Those types of businesses can be a few guys in the basement mixing, labeling, and running a website to even a larger business doing the same thing in a small warehouse. Their hot now gone next year and forgotten. The big companies producing massive volumes of liquid will be the ones shaping what we will have, not Billy Bob and Joe Joe selling their homemade bottled and labled liquid as premium liquid on the web.
 

sub4me

Moved On
Aug 31, 2014
1,295
663
USA
So, would you support the regulation? If these juice vendors have that much capital, they can probably survive the application process. Then we would at least have some list of ingredients, warning labels, deterrents for sales to minors, ect. Granted, the question I have about the hardware manufactures and B&Ms that make their own juice remain, but is it possible that the good outweighs the bad?

Yes some regs are needed, there's just no doubt about it and probably no way around it now. Most hardware is made in China and will probably remain that way due to price and manufacturing costs. I would look for more quality demands made on these imported goods for safety assurances. As far as local shops making their own liquid that's something that they need to sustain themselves and that's where most of their profits come from.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
Well, when you pair that with the hardware companies that are starting to get big, the sky might not be falling after all. Small businesses like B&Ms will be on the way out, but I think this was bound to happen anyways. I'm already seeing large B&M chains popping up in my area. Sure, we may have to pay more somewhere down the line, but I assume it will still be less than cigarettes and we will probably be getting stuff of a higher quality and it will be safer.

This information makes it seem like CASAA was grossly misrepresenting the economic impacts of the proposed rules!
 
Last edited:

ProjektMayhem

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 8, 2014
536
236
Mooresville, NC, USA
The thing is, out of everyone who will or might or wont support a group like any of these, how many have actually taken the time to contact their elected officials and told them how vaping helped your lives as well as if the FDA goes thru with the proposals they want that it will seriously harm the vaping community. I contacted mine as well as that SOB in the white house that I hate with a passion. Vaping is that important to me.
It is so simple to contact a Senator, Congressman or President and they always respond. If nothing else they know people are watching this topic of vaping and they might think before they vote on any legislation affecting it. Everyone knows how deadly smoking is. If people would just take the time to write an email to their elected officials with a "hey, I quit a 20 year, 30 year 40 year smoking habit in X amount of days and its all because of vaping where nothing else worked." It would go a long way to letting them know what the lobbyist are not telling them and we might end up with some vape friendly people in Washington.

I definitely agree with this 100%. I've contacted both NC Senators, my local Senator, and the governor about the whole FDA and how vaping helped me quit smoking. That's probably the best thing to do right now. If they get enough people and read enough stories maybe they will realize how important this is to us.
 

readeuler

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 17, 2014
1,203
1,945
Ohio, USA
Well, when you pair that with the hardware companies that starting to get big, the sky might not be falling after all. Small businesses like B&Ms will be on the way out, but I think this was bound to happen anyways. I'm already seeing large B&M chains popping up in my area. Sure, we may have to pay more somewhere down the line, but I assume it will still be less than cigarettes and the stuff we will probably be getting stuff of a higher quality and it will be safer.

This information makes it seem like CASAA was grossly misrepresenting the economic impacts of the proposed rules!

The simple fact of the matter is that it is very hard to accurately portray the vapor industry. Privately-held companies are easily more than 99.9% of the participants, and consequently we simply don't know their financial status; they don't need to declare profits to anyone but Uncle Sam. Somebody is claiming they're essentially all profit. That's possible, but certainly the reverse is possible - that most of them make a modest amount, are barely eeking by, or surviving on debt. We just don't know. I don't think it's fair to assume that the regulations will hardly affect the landscape. It's definitely going to cull the herd, who knows what will survive?

Of course there are a handful of large companies in each sub-sector. It probably follows some kind of power rule, where (for example) 80% of the revenue is being generated by 20% of the participants. I don't know how the newness of vaping affects the ratio of little to big guys, but I'd wager it pushes things in the "little guy" direction. This leads me to believe that the landscape will be altered fairly significantly by the deeming regs.

The market is evolving rapidly. This doesn't happen without plenty of R&D, and R&D isn't cheap. Just keep that in mind, when you estimate how much free cash can be thrown at the FDA. This applies primarily to manufacturers. On the retail end, the internet is one giant price war, which also isn't great for the bottom line.

These are just some counterpoints, before we jump to conclusions about how much liquid capital is floating around.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
Well, even if 99.9% of the market is small business, if the .1% has a large enough market share and can survive through regulation, I don't think that all is lost. Plus, we would have better products, flavors, ect. since those companies can afford the R&D. The was CASAA made it seem, the only things that would be left would be little plastic cigs. This is why there is such a panic and people are stockpiling products.

If sub4me is correct, this regulation might benefit us all in the long run. Granted, less options, but better, safer options with less guess work. It all seems like speculation at this point.
 

nyiddle

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 9, 2014
2,826
2,692
USA. State: Inebriated.
If sub4me is correct, this regulation might benefit us all in the long run. Granted, less options, but better, safer options with less guess work. It all seems like speculation at this point.

Heh, I made an extremely similar point in a thread not too long ago, and I think the thread got deleted because it was derailed by people flaming me, saying "THE FDA WILL RUIN E-CIGS" and "NO REGULATION IS THE ONLY GOOD REGULATION"

I'd love to see consistency in products. The ability to regulate will both be negative and positive. It'll certainly put people out of business (potentially small, hard-working guys) but it will also open up the market to the quality companies that actually care about their products.

Now then.. [puts on flame ......ant suit] BRING IT!

ETA: Lol, remember all those vape shops that closed down literally AS SOON as the FDA regulations were revealed (even though they'll take years to be put into effect). Talk about jumpin' the gun...
 

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest
Really? I didn't think that the market had grown that much already. Do you think that these companies have enough capital to back a large lobbyist group with s
ome weight to throw around? It would be awesome if someone did a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the market.

every day I hear vendors here selling 500+ bottles in a weekend. Lemme see........some o you are very naive not to know what kind o money is being made by vendors, almost all o who say they can't afford an $200 test on a bottle o liquid

10K a week in sales would be a conservative estimate for a popular eliquid vendor.......6 figs a year at least.

so yes, there is $$ for lobby group. Its a several billion dollars a year industry
 
Last edited:

Racehorse

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 12, 2012
11,230
28,254
USA midwest
ETA: Lol, remember all those vape shops that closed down literally AS SOON as the FDA regulations were revealed (even though they'll take years to be put into effect). Talk about jumpin' the gun...

I looked at most o them, they had antiquated inventory, couldn't keep pace w/how fast the tech was moving.

Nothing to do with fda from my studying their websites.....
 

nyiddle

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 9, 2014
2,826
2,692
USA. State: Inebriated.
I looked at most o them, they had antiquated inventory, couldn't keep pace w/how fast the tech was moving.

Nothing to do with fda from my studying their websites.....

I'm fairly certain I saw several posts on Reddit/various other sites of vendors closing down specifically because they were anticipating the FDA regulation to be harsh. I can't provide any links, but that's definitely what I saw. Distinct messages blaming the FDA for their shutdowns.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
every day I hear vendors here selling 500+ bottles in a weekend. Lemme see........some o you are very naive not to know what kind o money is being made by vendors, almost all o who say they can't afford an $200 test on a bottle o liquid

10K a week in sales would be a conservative estimate for a popular eliquid vendor.......6 figs a year at least.

so yes, there is $$ for lobby group. Its a several billion dollars a year industry

If they have that much money, then there is no need for lobbying at this point. If I was a premium juice vendor with 5 or 6 flavors that people are buying like mad, the proposed rules would be in my favor. With that small of a line and enough capital, getting through the application process would be no problem. Also, it would put a lot of the smaller lines out of business. They can worry about the next set of proposals when the time comes.
 

Plastic Shaman

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2012
268
190
Albuquerque
I'm fairly certain I saw several posts on Reddit/various other sites of vendors closing down specifically because they were anticipating the FDA regulation to be harsh. I can't provide any links, but that's definitely what I saw. Distinct messages blaming the FDA for their shutdowns.

That's actually really funny considering all the proposed rules do is bring these products within the jurisdiction of the FDA and won't go into effect for a while.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread