All these threads regarding safety and regulations, and my ranting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fernand

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2010
907
747
Californeea
Of the 3 compounds that give many foods a smooth buttery taste (diacetyl, acetyl propionyl and acetoin) the first two are known to be irritating enough on inhalation to cause irreversible lung damage at a concentration estimated to be 20-100 times higher than what e-liquids highly flavored with them might vape at. This is a dismally inadequate margin, especially since illness was seen at buttered popcorn plants with average air concentration below that. These flavorings are used very widely, including wines and ciagarette tobacco, and if one compound is flagged or banned, the others are used. Thus disclosing use of diacetyl alone is not very useful. If all 3 are eliminated the food industry will develop new ones. Having Chinese materials safety lists (as one juice-mixer promised) doesn't count as complete disclosure for me, as Chinese industry was built on lies from A to Z, only a chemist can start to untangle any if it, and nobody knows what is toxic on inhalation. A juice-mixer can disclose very little that's relevant. Even if a flavor-maker discloses everything (about as likely as Chanel disclosing their scent recipes), they buy chemicals and "accords" they do not have full disclosure on. There's a hierarchy of secrets and there is money in keeping your upstream suppliers to yourself. Oh, and by the way, Chanel designed none of their fragrances, Roudnitska did, and they in turn don't know what's in the bases they buy in bulk.

But I believe more importantly this is our canary in a coal mine, as none of these food flavorings were intended for inhalation. So I have cut use of all the cute-bottled flavorings in my DIY dramatically to a "very subtle" level, in practice under 2.5% of total volume. In the process, i found that my feeling of fullness in the lungs and slight shortness of breath have tremendously improved.

By reviewing Flavourart's list of diacetyl-containing flavors I have marked all flavors that contain more than a trace of diacetyl, and all that resemble them, and completely avoided them, regardless of who makes them, and regardless of whether they claim to be "diacetyl-free", since they are likely to contain the substitutes. I'm personally not concerned about the ones that we know contain traces, I get probably as much buttering my toast, but I'm not using any vanilla custards, or yogurts, or apple pie, or wild mixed nuts, or coconut. All we can do beyond that is guess. Disclosure of percentage of all 3 of the "buttery" compounds in all flavors on the market would be nice.

There is a possibility that the third compound, acetoin, will not show this same extent of toxicity when results of the NIH acute toxicology study are published. If acetoin at 300 ppm can be breathed by rats and mice for over 8 hours a day without sign of nasal or bronchial (or lung!) tissue necrosis or apoptosis, then acetoin might turn out to be usable as an acceptable substitute, and the alert level on the issue might de-escalate with regard to vaping as well, as long as all diacetyl AND acetyl propionyl are eliminated from flavoring.

However if acetoin is no better than the other 2, then the food industry will desperately synthesize substitutes that will not necessarily be tested for vape-like inhalation toxicity and the musical chairs will become even more dangerous.

I rather expect that many of the esters, aldehydes and ketones that give natural and artificial flavor, when tested will turn out to be highly irritating to delicate respiratory tissues at higher concentration, and simply cannot be inhaled with impunity. [I do think that] until we can identify or design molecules that are safer in this role, we should use as little flavoring as possible all around. I'm very fond of strong and sweet thick rich flavors, it's a bit of gluttony, but it seems that my lungs feel better with light flavoring, my sensing has compensated so I can now enjoy much more subtle flavoring, and it's just not worth vaping loads of additional chemicals when even unflavored glycerin & propylene glycol & nicotine taste fine, and a touch of menthol or fruity aroma turns it into a feast. I hope that answers your question, edwv30.
 
Last edited:

Fernand

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2010
907
747
Californeea
Good Lord, no. Did you think i was telling you what to do? Edwv30 asked me, so I thought I'd be very precise and very clear, since he seemed to think it was very important, that I didn't think diacetyl was the main issue, and exactly why, and that MY reaction was to back off on ALL flavorings, and not be worried about nicotine.
 
Last edited:

Automaton

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2010
2,997
73
US
Fernand,

I found your reply generally informative and genial, but it has opinions in places that are portrayed as fact. And while that doesn't necessarily bother me (people do it a lot, myself included), those who subtly insult people for not doing what those who are concerned about diacetyl think they "should" do use that as ammo.

People aren't "just asking for disclosure" as someone who was being subtely insulting said. It has become the divisive issue some people have grabbed on to for their fix of conspiracy and rioting incivility. I'm not saying you have, but every time this topic comes up, I start to see it leak into the conversation. I'm already seeing it. So stuff like this (emphasis mine)...

Until we can identify or design molecules that are safer in this role, we should use as little flavoring as possible all around.

... Is not helpful, or accurate for that matter.

You're not basing that sweeping generalization on any more information than anyone else has. And none of us know enough to make recommendations about what anyone else should be doing.

I have all the same information that you do, and I've decided I'm not concerned. I'm a reasonably intelligent person with a decent working knowledge of chemistry and biology. I'm perfectly capable of deciding these things for myself.

But saying things like that implies you are privy to something the rest of us aren't. And people take that and run with it.
 

Fernand

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2010
907
747
Californeea
That was a grammatical or syntactical problem. I meant to say that in the context of my thoughts, that I expect a lot of flavorings to be irritants, so it was my conclusion to use as little as possible, not sure how I might structure the paragraph more clearly, at some point repeating "I believe that .. It is my personal view .." etc is ridiculous. [but ok, if you prefer]
 
Last edited:

Automaton

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2010
2,997
73
US
I understand. I wasn't actually so much aiming my first comment at you, but it is such a volatile topic that I am always careful how I talk about it. I'm sick the antagonizing. Your tone didn't strike me as antagonizing, but everything said about diacetyl gets so twisted out of context eventually.

If I had come to your conclusion, I might have said it more like this.
Until we can identify or design molecules that are safer in this role, I use as little flavoring as possible all around.

That's fairly simple, and doesn't require stumbling all over your disclaimers.

Because that sentence really is the heart of the matter. "Until we know more," in essence, we don't know enough to know what is safe to use and what isn't. And that's very true.
 

Fernand

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2010
907
747
Californeea
Oh, well, fixed it a different way, while keeping a little discipline on myself in the main clause. I wish I completely DID, I know I SHOULD, but I have this bottle of "doubler" that's waffle and caramel and pecan, I have no idea if it has butterers in it but it probably does, and its what nearly put me in pulmonary goopdown, in the morning i felt like i was drowning (in a cemetary full of syrup), so I now have some in a carto with no nic, and suck on it without inhaling, it's soooooo good, and then my regular vape tastes so light ... like a summer breeze in a cemetery.
 

Antwoord

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 5, 2010
203
155
U.S.
I have no desire to quit taking nicotine at this time. Even though Nicorette is marketed as a cessation aid I know for a fact that most people who use it to quit smoking will keep on using it for the rest of their life. The only thing that qualifies it as a cessation aid is a pamphlet included in the package of gum/lozenges/inhalers/etc. There is no cessation program, just some suggestions written on a piece of paper. I've quit some pretty serious addictions, and I'd have to say quitting smoking was the hardest. Nicotine isn't going to make you hit a bottom where you're sleeping on the streets and watching your friends die. Maybe that's why it is harder to quit, but I really think the addiction to not only nicotine but all the other goodies that come with cigarettes is an incredibly strong addiction.

It doesn't bother me in the least to keep using nicotine. Using is a pretty screwed up word though. You wouldn't apply it to coffee. I really don't care for the hyper health conscious society we have. I don't care for the type of judgmental thinking it creates in people. There are always going to be people who are curious. Sometimes those people discover something useful, and sometimes it is a mistake. One of the most important chemists in history had a compulsion to taste everything he created. It killed him. There are also always going to be people who are trying to kill the pain with some substance, activity, or another. Kids spin around in circles to make themselves dizzy. Human beings have done things to alter their conscious state since the dawn of time. Some people believe that this contributes to evolution.

Trying to make sure things are safe while we go through this multi-generational, evolutionary journey is a good thing, but it really can't go much farther than that in philosophical terms, or as the Zoroastrians probably didn't mean to put it, ~Once good triumphs over evil that is the end of everything~. Life is going to break your heart and kill you, but you don't have to look at it quite that way :) That is not to say that people don't have the right to know whether or not they are consuming something that is dangerous, or whether or not it is in fact dangerous. I think it is only right to give people all the information you can concerning things that affect their health. I wish I could do something to change the tone of these discussions. We don't know enough at this time, and focusing on what we can actually do in regards to these concerns is tricky. I agree with using very light flavorings, I think we should inform people in a reasonable way given what we know, and I think the trade organization is probably the best thing that could be done.
 

warbdan

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2009
795
17
Somerset, Kentucky, United States
I know exactly what you're saying Fernand and I don't think you were trying to upset anyone. I also have lowered my flavorings from 20% to !0% and now 5% of total volume, because of that "heavy lung" feeling. It's gone now and I feel much better. Until we learn more about the flavorings or someone invents inhalable flavorings I prefer to keep them in low quantities. I would vape unflavored liquid, but that's so boring and unsatisfying, LOL.
 

Edwv30

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 5, 2010
328
76
Saint Augustine, Florida
Thank you for your detailed response Fernand. It's unfortunate that you had to defend your views about Diacetyl, (and other chemicals). This is often the case when the subject is brought up. I simply want to know if this chemical is being used in the juices that I inhale. All consumers should have this information available in order to make decisions about their health.

If you read back through this thread you will see that I am not the first person to bring up the Diacetyl issue, (you may be surprised who did). And yes, we are only asking for disclosure and are in no way "telling people what to do." If you had responded with opinions or information that conflicted with my own I certainly wouldn't have berated you or told you how to think or rewrite your posts(s). Discussion is productive when it comes to this issue...shutting people's views down is not.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Racehorse

shanagan

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 14, 2010
1,238
72
Texas
Fernand,

I found your reply generally informative and genial, but it has opinions in places that are portrayed as fact. And while that doesn't necessarily bother me (people do it a lot, myself included), those who subtly insult people for not doing what those who are concerned about diacetyl think they "should" do use that as ammo.

People aren't "just asking for disclosure" as someone who was being subtely insulting said. It has become the divisive issue some people have grabbed on to for their fix of conspiracy and rioting incivility. I'm not saying you have, but every time this topic comes up, I start to see it leak into the conversation. I'm already seeing it. So stuff like this (emphasis mine)...



... Is not helpful, or accurate for that matter.

You're not basing that sweeping generalization on any more information than anyone else has. And none of us know enough to make recommendations about what anyone else should be doing.

I have all the same information that you do, and I've decided I'm not concerned. I'm a reasonably intelligent person with a decent working knowledge of chemistry and biology. I'm perfectly capable of deciding these things for myself.

But saying things like that implies you are privy to something the rest of us aren't. And people take that and run with it.

MistressNomad, I sense a lot of anger from you on this subject, and suspect I have something to do with it. I want you to know, I do not care what you vape, honestly. That doesn't change the fact that I, and others, don't want to vape it. You have to allow that we need disclosure in order to make that decision for ourselves - not for you, but for ourselves - and that's in no way inciting riots, conspiracy theories, or subtly implied insults. It is tiring to have to constantly defend against this strawman, and indeed, I believe your continued invective needs to stop. I've suggested before that we will have to agree to disagree, and would ask that from you again.
 
Last edited:

Antwoord

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 5, 2010
203
155
U.S.
Of the 3 compounds that give many foods a smooth buttery taste (diacetyl, acetyl propionyl and acetoin) the first two are known to be irritating enough on inhalation to cause irreversible lung damage at a concentration estimated to be 20-100 times higher than what e-liquids highly flavored with them might vape at. This is a dismally inadequate margin, especially since illness was seen at buttered popcorn plants with average air concentration below that. These flavorings are used very widely, including wines and ciagarette tobacco, and if one compound is flagged or banned, the others are used. Thus disclosing use of diacetyl alone is not very useful. If all 3 are eliminated the food industry will develop new ones. Having Chinese materials safety lists (as one juice-mixer promised) doesn't count as complete disclosure for me, as Chinese industry was built on lies from A to Z, only a chemist can start to untangle any if it, and nobody knows what is toxic on inhalation. A juice-mixer can disclose very little that's relevant. Even if a flavor-maker discloses everything (about as likely as Chanel disclosing their scent recipes), they buy chemicals and "accords" they do not have full disclosure on. There's a hierarchy of secrets and there is money in keeping your upstream suppliers to yourself. Oh, and by the way, Chanel designed none of their fragrances, Roudnitska did, and they in turn don't know what's in the bases they buy in bulk.

But I believe more importantly this is our canary in a coal mine, as none of these food flavorings were intended for inhalation. So I have cut use of all the cute-bottled flavorings in my DIY dramatically to a "very subtle" level, in practice under 2.5% of total volume. In the process, i found that my feeling of fullness in the lungs and slight shortness of breath have tremendously improved.

By reviewing Flavourart's list of diacetyl-containing flavors I have marked all flavors that contain more than a trace of diacetyl, and all that resemble them, and completely avoided them, regardless of who makes them, and regardless of whether they claim to be "diacetyl-free", since they are likely to contain the substitutes. I'm personally not concerned about the ones that we know contain traces, I get probably as much buttering my toast, but I'm not using any vanilla custards, or yogurts, or apple pie, or wild mixed nuts, or coconut. All we can do beyond that is guess. Disclosure of percentage of all 3 of the "buttery" compounds in all flavors on the market would be nice.

I think disclosure of all three compounds is a better idea. I wrote the original template "letter" using the wording, "since diacetyl is the only flavoring agent in question at this time", etc. It was a little tongue in cheek, but I meant nothing personal by it. FieryOne revised the letter, but I still think it needs further revision. I think the temptation to discuss personal stances in all of this drowns out what can actually be done. Unconsciously I think people are trying to convince others that their views on the issue are "right" because that is all they can really conceive of doing. Things have gotten a little out of hand along the way, but I think cooperation is necessary. There are very smart people with a lot to offer that don't deserve to be labeled and ostracized.

Do you still think that disclosure isn't quite the way to go as it opens up possibilities for the flavoring industry to synthesize more flavoring agents that would not be tested, or do you think it will make flavoring vendors aware of the issues so that maybe they do something like create E-Liquid sections on their sites where only flavors that don't contain the bad chemicals are listed for sale? Or, perhaps even further, they refuse to sell the buttery type flavorings to e-liquid suppliers for their own legal safety? (I'm not saying anyone's choice should be removed, this is strictly a what if scenario.)

Also a letter may not be the best idea either. A stickied petition type thing to sign to send to flavor companies and suppliers might be better. I'm interested to hear thoughts on this.
 
Last edited:

Zelphie

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 29, 2010
1,483
554
S.E. Michigan
Fernand, what juice mixer promised chinese material safety lists? I know this is another loaded topic, but Id like to get your opinion. I know nothing other than the opposing views on vaping chinese juices from people around here, in what ways is the chinese industry built on lies? I vape a lot chinese juice and as difficult or impossible as it may be to figure out exactly what your really vaping even with DIY flavoring, I think vaping juice from a large corp. would be even more difficult. Of course that in itself doesnt mean its better or worse than anything else.
Any help??

Of the 3 compounds that give many foods a smooth buttery taste (diacetyl, acetyl propionyl and acetoin) the first two are known to be irritating enough on inhalation to cause irreversible lung damage at a concentration estimated to be 20-100 times higher than what e-liquids highly flavored with them might vape at. This is a dismally inadequate margin, especially since illness was seen at buttered popcorn plants with average air concentration below that. These flavorings are used very widely, including wines and ciagarette tobacco, and if one compound is flagged or banned, the others are used. Thus disclosing use of diacetyl alone is not very useful. If all 3 are eliminated the food industry will develop new ones. Having Chinese materials safety lists (as one juice-mixer promised) doesn't count as complete disclosure for me, as Chinese industry was built on lies from A to Z, only a chemist can start to untangle any if it, and nobody knows what is toxic on inhalation. A juice-mixer can disclose very little that's relevant. Even if a flavor-maker discloses everything (about as likely as Chanel disclosing their scent recipes), they buy chemicals and "accords" they do not have full disclosure on. There's a hierarchy of secrets and there is money in keeping your upstream suppliers to yourself. Oh, and by the way, Chanel designed none of their fragrances, Roudnitska did, and they in turn don't know what's in the bases they buy in bulk.

But I believe more importantly this is our canary in a coal mine, as none of these food flavorings were intended for inhalation. So I have cut use of all the cute-bottled flavorings in my DIY dramatically to a "very subtle" level, in practice under 2.5% of total volume. In the process, i found that my feeling of fullness in the lungs and slight shortness of breath have tremendously improved.

By reviewing Flavourart's list of diacetyl-containing flavors I have marked all flavors that contain more than a trace of diacetyl, and all that resemble them, and completely avoided them, regardless of who makes them, and regardless of whether they claim to be "diacetyl-free", since they are likely to contain the substitutes. I'm personally not concerned about the ones that we know contain traces, I get probably as much buttering my toast, but I'm not using any vanilla custards, or yogurts, or apple pie, or wild mixed nuts, or coconut. All we can do beyond that is guess. Disclosure of percentage of all 3 of the "buttery" compounds in all flavors on the market would be nice.

There is a possibility that the third compound, acetoin, will not show this same extent of toxicity when results of the NIH acute toxicology study are published. If acetoin at 300 ppm can be breathed by rats and mice for over 8 hours a day without sign of nasal or bronchial (or lung!) tissue necrosis or apoptosis, then acetoin might turn out to be usable as an acceptable substitute, and the alert level on the issue might de-escalate with regard to vaping as well, as long as all diacetyl AND acetyl propionyl are eliminated from flavoring.

However if acetoin is no better than the other 2, then the food industry will desperately synthesize substitutes that will not necessarily be tested for vape-like inhalation toxicity and the musical chairs will become even more dangerous.

I rather expect that many of the esters, aldehydes and ketones that give natural and artificial flavor, when tested will turn out to be highly irritating to delicate respiratory tissues at higher concentration, and simply cannot be inhaled with impunity. [I do think that] until we can identify or design molecules that are safer in this role, we should use as little flavoring as possible all around. I'm very fond of strong and sweet thick rich flavors, it's a bit of gluttony, but it seems that my lungs feel better with light flavoring, my sensing has compensated so I can now enjoy much more subtle flavoring, and it's just not worth vaping loads of additional chemicals when even unflavored glycerin & propylene glycol & nicotine taste fine, and a touch of menthol or fruity aroma turns it into a feast. I hope that answers your question, edwv30.
 

Fernand

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 5, 2010
907
747
Californeea
China went from being a backwards totalitarian Maoist system where absolutely everything was a lie, and factories lied about their production and ingredients, to a fascist totalitarian system that encourages money-making, regardless of anything else. They have gotten Westerners to build plants for them while the power structure always retains 51% control behind the scenes, I'm not aware of any situation in which Westerners own more than 49%. They could kick us out overnight and keep all the tooling and high tech. It's too late now, we have shown them everything we know. The veneer of free enterprise is to the state's strategic advantage, so it's unlikely they will kick us out, why should they, they own our money, we work for them. But the instances of baby food poisoning are the tip of the iceberg, there is no concept of ethics. Where would it come from, when they have exterminated all traditional thinking? Nothing is trustworthy in that situation, certainly not purity of chemicals unless they happen to be that way, or the cheating purchasing manager gets nailed. If motor oil will pass for olive oil, not make a costly scandal, and costs less, somebody will surely use motor oil. You can believe what you want but I've spent time there, and I don't believe anything they say or do, and nobody is better at pretending, they've had half a century of truly intensive practice. If they're packaging pharmaceuticals in some hole with no sanitation, they'll take visitors to whatever model plant and tell them it's their production facility. With the money they make, they might build a better one. Or not. You just never know at what level they happen to be right now. To not be bamboozled you'd have to be totally fluent in the language and know what's going on, or know someone there who'll risk everything just to inform you. So of course you can do business with China, and even get what you want, but it's always on their terms, whether you know it or not. They've come a long way economically in the last 15 years, but ethics and openness have nothing to do with it. As to the juice company who was promising Chinese disclosures, I think they were called DV, or was it V4L, someone in the diacetyl thread pointed at it as exemplary.
 
Last edited:

SimpleSins

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 18, 2010
1,121
18
SW Iowa
While I agree that China is not exactly the poster child for ethics, I don't think here in the states we're a whole lot ahead of them. And the only thing that keeps anybody at all honest is the same alphabet soup of government agencies that everyone loves to hate. Look at even the abject horror at the concept of simple disclosure. Look at the oil rig that blew up because Halliburton wanted to save a few bucks. I can't count the vehicle recalls because American firms tried to go on the cheap and not fix known issues. Heck, even the stuff that has been recalled because of Chinese tainting came about because American firms wanted to save a few bucks. So while I do agree that you can't necessarily count on Chinese safety, I'm not thinking the American companies are much more trustworthy. In all cases it's pretty much a roll of the dice as to what you're vaping.
 

Shan B

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Sep 26, 2010
494
6
Latrobe, PA
www.Vapecore.com
I have an addictive personality and have tried to quit smoking several times. For months at a time at the longest. 7 days this time and less problems, but I am still vaping. Lungs were intended to inhale and exhale air, anything in addition is not normal. So far vaping seems to be a lesser evil - won't be setting the house on fire, won't be inhaling tar or carcinogens - will still be getting nicotine which isn't a health aid.



100% proven to be bad(der) than smoking? Yeah, I'd quit vaping and start smoking again. I've tried it all, I'll probably never quit tobacco products entirely. That doesn't mean I wouldn't still try, it just means that I've been trying for over 20 years and have failed. I've always hated smoking, from a child who was around it, to an adult who does it.

As for the rest . . . meh. To each his own. I don't like unfair taxes, the way some people take two spots when they park, how some people put the end of a bottle inside their lips to drink, and many other things, but I've the wisdom to know some of the things I can or can't change. The things that I know I can't change, I just . . . can't.

I know, for a fact, that if I live and work near busy streets, the damage from the emissions from cars will cause me a great deal of harm to my body. What can a person do? Hell, termites cause more greenhouse emissions than gasoline engines do every day, but nobody is out to eradicate termites to save the planet . . . why? Because there is no money in it, or at least not yet anyway. All we can do, without buying an island and avoiding all the hazards, is to try to play the hands we are dealt and try to come up with the best combination of good and bad cards.

If a man spent his entire life pondering the meaning of life; on his deathbed he may, or may not, realize that he wasted his whole life by trying to understand it instead of living it.

MTA!!! Kudos for this post. I also stole your lil quote at the end as my new quote for the day to live by. Thank You!
 

banjo

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 25, 2010
3,350
215
Rio Oso, CA
China went from being a backwards totalitarian Maoist system where absolutely everything was a lie, and factories lied about their production and ingredients, to a fascist totalitarian system that encourages money-making, regardless of anything else. They have gotten Westerners to build plants for them while the power structure always retains 51% control behind the scenes, I'm not aware of any situation in which Westerners own more than 49%. They could kick us out overnight and keep all the tooling and high tech. It's too late now, we have shown them everything we know. The veneer of free enterprise is to the state's strategic advantage, so it's unlikely they will kick us out, why should they, they own our money, we work for them. But the instances of baby food poisoning are the tip of the iceberg, there is no concept of ethics. Where would it come from, when they have exterminated all traditional thinking? Nothing is trustworthy in that situation, certainly not purity of chemicals unless they happen to be that way, or the cheating purchasing manager gets nailed. If motor oil will pass for olive oil, not make a costly scandal, and costs less, somebody will surely use motor oil. You can believe what you want but I've spent time there, and I don't believe anything they say or do, and nobody is better at pretending, they've had half a century of truly intensive practice. If they're packaging pharmaceuticals in some hole with no sanitation, they'll take visitors to whatever model plant and tell them it's their production facility. With the money they make, they might build a better one. Or not. You just never know at what level they happen to be right now. To not be bamboozled you'd have to be totally fluent in the language and know what's going on, or know someone there who'll risk everything just to inform you. So of course you can do business with China, and even get what you want, but it's always on their terms, whether you know it or not. They've come a long way economically in the last 15 years, but ethics and openness have nothing to do with it. As to the juice company who was promising Chinese disclosures, I think they were called DV, or was it V4L, someone in the diacetyl thread pointed at it as exemplary.

Amazing - quicker than a blink of the eye - and we are suddenly in the middle of a xenophobic rant against China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread