ALL VAPERS look at this pic! what do you think?

Status
Not open for further replies.

realsis

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 8, 2014
1,802
1,655
California
I live in California and I believe it's banned in the same place smoking is banned. What I don't understand is they put these bans on nicotine and tobacco yet continue to make alcohol glamorous. Alcohol does kill, it killed my father and that's just from drinking. It also wrecks family's and lives. I don't think vaping has done that, yet they ban it.what a hypocritical society we live in! What about teen drinking? Yet every other commercial is about how sexy you are if you drink their brand! I just don't get it. They allow that to go on, and it does kill, yet ban a e cigarette because of vapor. What is more harmful here folks? What the heck is wrong with people! Take something harmless or less harmful and ban it but glamorize something that IS deadly. We live in a screwed up world.
 

Heartisan

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 30, 2010
509
135
North Cali
Realsis, as far as I know (only did a quick Google search to confirm what I believed has already passed) only Los Angeles counties have approved a ban in same places as cigarettes.
It's coming though! There is legislation beginning all over the US to put bans in place. Vapers seriously need to check out their states, cities and/or counties and start contacting their Representatives!
Unfortunately, a lot was brought on by vapors suddenly having the freedom to vape anywhere they choose - and that always pisses non-smokers off. :(
I've vaped surreptitiously just about everywhere I go - restaurants, movie theaters, doctors office bathrooms, airports - but never openly unless it was a large outside area. Just didn't want to deal with confrontations. Whether its cigs or ecigs, people will always look down on it. Smokers have been treated as 2nd class citizens for decades now, and I figured it was a matter of time until vapers suffered the same fate.

It's going to be a big fight. I'm more worried about CA banning the purchase of eliquids than restaurants banning vaping. You can always go to the bathroom and vape without anyone realizing. :)
 

NerdVap0r

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 12, 2014
506
447
Bay Area
Lol cmon guys. It's ppl's businesses lol. They gotta do whats best to keep it alive, Vapors can & will scare customers away from them. Vaping is still in infant form to the world. Im just surprised alot of vapors feel very entitled to do it anywhere they please & disregard respecting companies & businesses. Not a good look for the community. my $0.02
 

stevegmu

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 10, 2013
11,630
12,348
6992 kilometers from home...
Lol cmon guys. It's ppl's businesses lol. They gotta do whats best to keep it alive, Vapors can & will scare customers away from them. Vaping is still in infant form to the world. Im just surprised alot of vapors feel very entitled to do it anywhere they please & disregard respecting companies & businesses. Not a good look for the community. my $0.02

I think most of them were never smokers or are dual use vapers. They still smoke, but feel they should be able to vape where they can't smoke. Too many BLU commercials...
 

NenaSoul

Full Member
Apr 23, 2013
28
11
UK/Spain
Am I missing something? If this is the exterior entrance as it appears, they cant ban vaping on the 50ft of land outside the store unless the land is also their private property. They can ask politely, but not ban. Correct me if im wrong, but thats just obnoxious.

Inside is another matter, their property, their rules, dont like it? Dont go there. Better if theres a sign, then you wont waste your time giving them your business. I dont vape inside public places anyway if there are other people nearby and there might be any chance of bothering them, only if its quiet and in a spacious place and then Il ask the staff before doing so, its only polite. But then I am British.
 

CKCalmer

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 20, 2014
717
1,149
My mancave
I wonder if anyone has tried holding up their vaping rig in front of a business's manager and point to the tank, saying, "It's my personal vaporizer, and that's Albuterol Sulfate. It's so I can stay alive rather than dying from asphyxia."

No, I wouldn't lie to anyone about my vaping. My overblown sense of principle wouldn't allow it. But I'd be very surprised if no one else had ever done that with a tank of clear-colored Faux Hawk or CoolMist, for example.
 

jpargana

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2010
777
2,537
55
Portugal
Taking analogs out of the subject, and just leave it with just the vaping issue.

I believe a company has the rights to have a leeway over what and how their company should be ran. They have the right to require certain dress codes, and ethic codes to match the clientele they want to attract. some things that might come into consideration are:

Shirts, shoes, smoking, vaping, skateboarding, age, Formal wear only, casual attire only, no blue jeans, etc...

Things like these have no issue on whether or not it's legal to do those things, it's whether or not they want that sort of clientele in their place of business. The company I work REQUIRES for employment: Belts, no facial hair, no excessive jewelry, no visible tattoos, no gagues, one ear ring per ear for women, no hair touching the collar for men etc. It's not unlawful to do any of these, but it's required to work there because they want to project a certain image.

Same principle applies to their customers, shirts and shoes are required to shop there. No loitering, no advertising, no pan handling, etc. It's their right to have a standard about how they want to conduct business.

It is your right to decide not to shop or do business with them as well. That is what free market is all about, and I am all for it. If I ever were to own a business, I would allow vapers in, but allow smokers only outside. It would be my right as a business owner. I may not like other people's policies, but that doesn't mean I don't think they have the right to want their own standards.

my 2 cents worth.


That may be all and good... INSIDE.
But, did you actually look closer at the original post? The sign says "No smoking or vapor cigarettes within 50ft of Entrance". That's what we're discussing here! Does the business actually OWN the 50ft of sidewalk? Would your company FORCE the same dress code on passers-by who just happen to be walking by the door? Because, if there's NO ordinance, and the space outside is NOT owned by the business owner, then that sign is as worthless as the paper they used to print it.


Come to think of it, that sign does not even mention INSIDE. Provided that the place is large enough, one could strictly obey that sign (ordinances and non-smoking laws aside) by SMOKING INSIDE... that is, IF you step 50ft away 'from the entrance' !! :D
 
Last edited:

Absintheur

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 7, 2012
2,911
4,920
north central Indiana
This whole argument baffles me...if as a vaper your have to the right to vape in public why wouldn't a property owner have the right to ban vaping on private property?

It is your choice whether or not to go to that establishment, if their policies offend you then don't give them your money...simple enough. Rights are a two way street.
 

jpargana

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2010
777
2,537
55
Portugal
This whole argument baffles me...if as a vaper your have to the right to vape in public why wouldn't a property owner have the right to ban vaping on private property?

It is your choice whether or not to go to that establishment, if their policies offend you then don't give them your money...simple enough. Rights are a two way street.

Well, because, UNLESS they actually own the 50ft of sidewalk around the entrance, then it is NOT their property!

"No smoking or vapor cigarettes within 50ft of Entrance"
 

Claudia P

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 19, 2013
4,137
23,651
Dayton, TN, USA
I think inconsiderate vapers are responsible for things like this, just as inconsiderate cell phone users and inconsiderate parents are responsible for signs asking people not to use cell phones or not allowing children in their establishments. If people were respectful of those around them none of these things would be happening.

We all ask others to respect our rights, but do we respect theirs?
 

jpargana

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 5, 2010
777
2,537
55
Portugal
I think inconsiderate vapers are responsible for things like this, just as inconsiderate cell phone users and inconsiderate parents are responsible for signs asking people not to use cell phones or not allowing children in their establishments. If people were respectful of those around them none of these things would be happening.

We all ask others to respect our rights, but do we respect theirs?

Well, I must disagree. I do not think THIS particular sign was created because of 'inconsiderate vapers' vaping INSIDE, since it 'forbids' vapers from vaping OUTSIDE, within 50ft of sidewalk around the entrance, which the business probably does not even OWN.

I believe rampant anti-smoking, or rather, rampant anti-'anything-vaguely-resembling-smoking' was the cause of that sign. Let's just treat vaping like smoking, even if we do not own that outdoor space, even if no ordinance forbids people from VAPING outside.

"Let's just make up our OWN laws, because we DO NOT LIKE it, and we will be supported because many people DO NOT LIKE it either."


And to be clear, I only vape INSIDE with the owner's permission. I know it's not smoke, but other people may not, and be troubled, and all that. OUTSIDE, I will vape ANYWHERE. Even if I was smoking TOBACCo, there's NO way I would be 'ruining other people's health'. Vaping is magnitudes safer. So, that's why that sign makes me sick: it demands that people should not vape (magnitudes safer than tobacco) even OUTSIDE (where even TOBACCO would NOT pose a real threat to others).

This is not about 'health concerns'. This is ideology and segregation. "I do not WANT you to vape near me, in a PUBLIC space".
 

alexfeetham

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 18, 2014
89
37
Halifax, West Yorkshire, UK
Now I don't know about American laws but 50ft in front of the entrance? Smells like bull.... to me. But i've started seeing more signs in the UK prohibiting the use of e-cigs in certain places. For example the bus I was on the other day had a sign prohibiting the use of cigarettes and "electronic cigarettes" whilst on board. Mind you this doesn't stop me from discretely using my e-cig on the top floor of the bus haha.
 

Anjaffm

Dragon Lady
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2013
2,468
8,639
Germany
I wonder if anyone has tried holding up their vaping rig in front of a business's manager and point to the tank, saying, "It's my personal vaporizer, and that's Albuterol Sulfate. It's so I can stay alive rather than dying from asphyxia."

No, I wouldn't lie to anyone about my vaping. My overblown sense of principle wouldn't allow it. But I'd be very surprised if no one else had ever done that with a tank of clear-colored Faux Hawk or CoolMist, for example.

Hahaha :D
Yes, I know a case like that. The person often speaks in public - and the vaping equipment is neatly disguised as some kind of medical inhalation device :)

(Sorry, I do not wish to tell the entire story here, "the world is a village" nowadays, if you know what I mean. But it works very well and stops people from bothering the person :D )
 

Anjaffm

Dragon Lady
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2013
2,468
8,639
Germany
Is this thread still going on?

Well, I must disagree. I do not think THIS particular sign was created because of 'inconsiderate vapers' vaping INSIDE, since it 'forbids' vapers from vaping OUTSIDE, within 50ft of sidewalk around the entrance, which the business probably does not even OWN.

I believe rampant anti-smoking, or rather, rampant anti-'anything-vaguely-resembling-smoking' was the cause of that sign. Let's just treat vaping like smoking, even if we do not own that outdoor space, even if no ordinance forbids people from VAPING outside.

"Let's just make up our OWN laws, because we DO NOT LIKE it, and we will be supported because many people DO NOT LIKE it either."


And to be clear, I only vape INSIDE with the owner's permission. I know it's not smoke, but other people may not, and be troubled, and all that. OUTSIDE, I will vape ANYWHERE. Even if I was smoking TOBACCo, there's NO way I would be 'ruining other people's health'. Vaping is magnitudes safer. So, that's why that sign makes me sick: it demands that people should not vape (magnitudes safer than tobacco) even OUTSIDE (where even TOBACCO would NOT pose a real threat to others).

This is not about 'health concerns'. This is ideology and segregation. "I do not WANT you to vape near me, in a PUBLIC space".

I fully agree :thumbs:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread