Am I the only one panicking about diketones??

Status
Not open for further replies.
I honestly hope to lose each and every one of you as a customer, someday. Despite the fact that we stand to profit by providing you with an option to traditional analog cigarettes, it's our sincerest hope that one day you lay put your mod down and cast aside all risks associated with inhaling anything except what God and nature intended.

That would require moving out of the major city i live in and into a wild untouched part of nature.. wich is nowhere to be found here :p As said before.. the air quality in just about every major city is hazardous. Unless they all start driving electric within the next 30 years we wont be better off :0
 

Megan Kogijiki Ratchford

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Jul 17, 2013
11,013
64,707
Arvada, CO
That would require moving out of the major city i live in and into a wild untouched part of nature.. wich is nowhere to be found here :p As said before.. the air quality in just about every major city is hazardous. Unless they all start driving electric within the next 30 years we wont be better off :0

So true! Due to the thermal inversion in Denver my doctor said living there equals a half pack of cigs a day in lung damage. And people are jogging in that! Blows the mind. SMH
 

Giraut

Moved On
Dec 6, 2013
500
624
The way I see the risks of vaping can be summed up thusly:

Risk level 0: not breathing.
Risk level 1: breathing clean air
...
Risk level 5: breathing slightly polluted city air
Risk level 6: vaping glycerin
Risk level 7: Vaping glycerin and nic
Risk level 8: Vaping glycerin, PG and nic
...
Risk level 12: Vaping glycerin, PG, nic and whatever chemicals happen to be present in flavoring
...
Risk level 20: light smoking (1 or 2 per day)
...
Risk level 30: medium smoking (5-10 per day)
...
Risk level 40: Living in Beijing
...
Risk level 50: Heavy smoking (1 pack or more per day)

I accept risk level 12, mostly because I come from 50. If I ever feel some odd effect due to an ingredient I can identify (such as PG for me), I'll take it out of the equation. I know that if worse comes to worst, I can fall back on unflavored VG and nic for minimal risk vaping that'll keep me off cigarettes. But I'm pretty sure I can't eliminate nic without going right back to cigarettes.
 
The way I see the risks of vaping can be summed up thusly:

Risk level 0: not breathing.
Risk level 1: breathing clean air
...
Risk level 5: breathing slightly polluted city air
Risk level 6: Vaping glycerin
Risk level 7: Vaping glycerin and nic
Risk level 8: Vaping glycerin, PG and nic
...
Risk level 12: Vaping glycerin, PG, nic and whatever chemicals happen to be present in flavoring
...
Risk level 20: light smoking (1 or 2 per day)
...
Risk level 30: medium smoking (5-10 per day)
...
Risk level 40: Living in Beijing
...
Risk level 50: Heavy smoking (1 pack or more per day)

I accept risk level 12, mostly because I come from 50. If I ever feel some odd effect due to an ingredient I can identify (such as PG for me), I'll take it out of the equation. I know that if worse comes to worst, I can fall back on unflavored VG and nic for minimal risk vaping that'll keep me off cigarettes. But I'm pretty sure I can't eliminate nic without going right back to cigarettes.

hmm perhaps diluting the lowest NIC to even lower? less and less nic intake over a long period will do wonders i guess ;)
 

Giraut

Moved On
Dec 6, 2013
500
624
hmm perhaps diluting the lowest NIC to even lower? less and less nic intake over a long period will do wonders i guess ;)

I'm at 4 mg most of the time, coming from 12. But there's a point of diminishing return, at which I've noticed I vape more to make up for the lower nic level. In other words, if I go too low on nic, I inhale more of the carrier chemicals that strictly necessary.

I lower my nic intake to try and get my body used to not having it slowly, but at the end of the day, I'd rather vape A ml at B mg than 2xA ml at B/2 mg, to inhale less flavorings for a given amount of nic.

Another thing that seems to work for me is carrying a bottle of 12 mg nic juice with me, along with my regular 4 mg bottle(s): if I start craving, I vape 10 drops of the stronger stuff, then go back to the weaker stuff. That way I don't chain-vape. With that method, cravings happen less and less often, and I stay on the weaker juices a lot longer. I'm hoping to stay on the 4 mg juices permanently eventually, at which point I'll switch to 2 mg. We'll see. What matters is, I never feel guilty when I go back to 12 mg juice temporarily - as opposed to lighting up a cigarette after having quit :)
 

Megan Kogijiki Ratchford

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Jul 17, 2013
11,013
64,707
Arvada, CO
Actually from all the most recent studies nicotine is the least harmful of all the ingredients in vape liquid. For instance they are putting nicotine patches on nonsmokers who have Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and age related dementia with wonderful results. Without all the accompanying crap from cigs nicotine is a wonderful drug apparently. Through smoking people have been killing themselves, true, but perhaps extending their quality of life. Ironic isn't it? :lol:
 

Kent Brooks

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2013
17,678
91,969
48
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
www.nicoticket.com
Same person. Clark is his middle name and we call him that as Kent is his dad's name too. I think I got that right...:blink:

But yes, one man, two names... :D

Kent Richard Brooks, nick-named Clark because my father was also Kent Brooks... I've been "little Clark" since I was old enough to reach for a bottle of Mtn. Dew. ;)
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
There's another variable - exposure. My doctor said to me once... 2-3 cigarettes a day isn't any worse than the air in LA. Honestly, I believe the guy. It's a question of levels of exposure, and what is acceptable vs. what is unacceptable in terms of levels. There is probably some level of exposure to diketones that they will inevitably determine is sufficiently low enough to minimize the risk of potential health consequences, BUT - there is still no substitute for clean, fresh air. Personally, I will take a bottle of eLiquid chock full of diacetyl over a cigarette, although I can't say with absolute certainty that it's safer. The popcorn workers were exposed to extremely high levels/concentrations of diacetyl, which was in every breath they took for as long as they were inside the plant (8-10 hour days), over a period of decades. I'd speculate that even a rabid vaper who consumes nothing but diacetyl based custard flavoring would consume a fraction of that in a lifetime.

I don't share this "opinion" with you to minimize the risk at all, because the risk is real. However, at present there are no known cases of "popcorn workers lung" in the vaping community - but - I don't expect there would be... after all, there hasn't been sufficient time for that kind of malady to manifest at the present levels of exposure. The only prudent advice I can give in the absence of sufficient research to prove or disprove otherwise is this...

I honestly hope to lose each and every one of you as a customer, someday. Despite the fact that we stand to profit by providing you with an option to traditional analog cigarettes, it's our sincerest hope that one day you lay put your mod down and cast aside all risks associated with inhaling anything except what God and nature intended.

" The popcorn workers were exposed to extremely high levels/concentrations of diacetyl, which was in every breath they took for as long as they were inside the plant (8-10 hour days), over a period of decades. "

or of a period of only a few months?


https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=21400

" The onset of symptoms associated with fixed airway obstruction has been reported to occur after a few months to several years of exposure to butter flavorings that contained diacetyl in a microwave popcorn production facility"


http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2013.187.1_MeetingAbstracts.A2081
 
Last edited:

pwheeler

Just Vaping
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 14, 2013
9,157
31,761
68
Weimar, TX
I know other vendors who claim their products are "diacetyl free", but only one I have seen disclose the possible hazards of the buttery, creamy flavors is Kent. I, for one, haven't tried CB, CLS or any of those, even before I found out that it was potentially a health concern. I was actually going to get around to it, but I am not sure now. I am stuck on the Virus, and Betelgeuse. I might still try some, but I'd hate to really fall in love with it and want to vape it like mad.
 
Last edited:

TraceyS

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 17, 2012
2,442
7,226
Blacksburg, Virginia
I know other vendors who claim their products are "diacetyl free", but only one I have seen disclose the possible hazards of the buttery, creamy flavors is Clark. I, for one, haven't tried CB, CLS or any of those, even before I found out that it was potentially a health concern. I was actually going to get around to it, but I am not sure now. I am stuck on the Virus, and Betelgeuse. I might still try some, but I'd hate to really fall in love with it and want to vape it like mad.

You would fall in love with it and vape it like mad. Living proof here....happens fast too.

Tracey
 

Kent Brooks

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Apr 24, 2013
17,678
91,969
48
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
www.nicoticket.com
" The popcorn workers were exposed to extremely high levels/concentrations of diacetyl, which was in every breath they took for as long as they were inside the plant (8-10 hour days), over a period of decades. "

or of a period of only a few months?


https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=FEDERAL_REGISTER&p_id=21400

" The onset of symptoms associated with fixed airway obstruction has been reported to occur after a few months to several years of exposure to butter flavorings that contained diacetyl in a microwave popcorn production facility"


An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Wow, great article! Thank you! I stand corrected! Here's some interesting info out of it...

The average full shift air levels of diacetyl in the mixing areas and production locations in close proximity to mixing tanks ranged from 0.2 to 38 ppm.

"For Diacetyl, a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 5 parts per billion (ppb) as an eight-hour, time-weighted average, (TWA) during a 40-hour work week. To further protect against effects of short-term exposures, NIOSH recommends in the draft document a short-term exposure limit (STEL) for diacetyl of 25 ppb for a 15-minute time period."

Although my liquid doesn't contain diacetyl, I would be interested in seeing what the Time Weighted Average of exposure is for an average vaper, who keeps custard "in the rotation", over a period of a week.
 

vangrl27

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2013
280
339
vancouver
Wow, great article! Thank you! I stand corrected! Here's some interesting info out of it...

The average full shift air levels of diacetyl in the mixing areas and production locations in close proximity to mixing tanks ranged from 0.2 to 38 ppm.

"For Diacetyl, a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 5 parts per billion (ppb) as an eight-hour, time-weighted average, (TWA) during a 40-hour work week. To further protect against effects of short-term exposures, NIOSH recommends in the draft document a short-term exposure limit (STEL) for diacetyl of 25 ppb for a 15-minute time period."

Although my liquid doesn't contain diacetyl, I would be interested in seeing what the Time Weighted Average of exposure is for an average vaper, who keeps custard "in the rotation", over a period of a week.

that indeed is the unanswered question!

"FYI- In a flavoring that has less than 1% (.6%) diacetyl/similar, when used at a mere 2% in a juice, we'd be vaping 1200 ppb"

then corrected

"That should read: "we'd be vaping juice that contains 1200 ppb" - but that doesn't mean there'd be 1200ppb in the vapor that we're vaping."

Honestly, I don't really understand the math in any of this stuff, just wanted to point out that symptoms started showing up much sooner than many think
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread