Just teasing. You know I love you and get what you mean.No need for popcorn. My point is lost among those who don't seem to want to understand it, and I have no way of making myself more clear.
I'm just waiting for the day they all start announcing they are vaping preservatives since PG has preservative properties too. Or humectents, since PG acts as a humectent.
I mean, why stop at announcing they are vaping antifreeze for God sakes?
As I said earlier.. the rest of us will just deal with the fall out from such pronouncements.
Just teasing. You know I love you and get what you mean.
No need for popcorn. My point is lost among those who don't seem to want to understand it, and I have no way of making myself more clear.
I'm just waiting for the day they all start announcing they are vaping preservatives since PG has preservative properties too. Or humectents, since PG acts as a humectent.
I mean, why stop at announcing they are vaping antifreeze for God sakes?
As I said earlier.. the rest of us will just deal with the fall out from such pronouncements.
What is the most common use of PG? I'd say its used more in vaping and secondly as a food additive. It has many roles and that is really what people should say. FDA has already approved PG so it doesn't matter what faceboobs saysI know... I love you too.
Now excuse me while i go off to vape some conditioner... hahaha.
What is the most common use of PG?
The truth is it is an ingredient in antifreeze - it's not hiding it. But it is not antifreeze, because there are further ingredients in antifreeze then simply PG. it is an ingredient that is resistant to freezing AND resistant to boiling. It also has many other properties as well and is found in many other things and has multiple applications.
When you say antifreeze - people think of the green or blue liquid you put into the radiator of your car.. THAT is not what PG is.
VG is a main ingredient in conditioner - yet when people ask us what VG is we don't tell them it's conditioner.
It's one thing to acknowledge what something is in a manner others can understand, and another to mislead others into thinking the WRONG thing.
And the wrong thing to say to a non vaper is that PG is antifreeze as an exact correlation, rather than saying its an ingredient in antifreeze because it has properties that are resistant to either freezing or boiling, but that it is also an ingredient in foods and medicines too, that is generally recognized as safe in medical applications.
The best thing to tell them, it is used as a non-toxic antifreeze
No.. the best thing is to tell them it's an ingredient in antifreeze.
It is an ingredient in automotive antifreeze but is used as a non-toxic antifreeze (mixed with water) in other applications.
Why is that? It's because it has properties that are resistant to both freezing and boiling.
Why not explain the why, instead of making exact coorelations.
Do you tell people VG is conditioner?
I mean seriously. .. there are better ways to explain PG and VG than to simply declare they are the sum of one property or that they are the equivalent of what they are used in!
No need for popcorn. My point is lost among those who don't seem to want to understand it, and I have no way of making myself more clear.
I'm just waiting for the day they all start announcing they are vaping preservatives since PG has preservative properties too. Or humectents, since PG acts as a humectent.
I mean, why stop at announcing they are vaping antifreeze for God sakes?
As I said earlier.. the rest of us will just deal with the fall out from such pronouncements.
I tell people it's PG, used in just about everything from meds to manufacturing. If they ask what kind of things I tell them some medications, food flavorings and as an ingredient in antifreeze, which was done to make it not kill animals anymore.
I tell them it's VG and used in meds, cosmetics, foods and such. I then tell them some foods or types, as well as medicines, and etc.
I then tell people both are easily available to purchase from box stores, pharmacies to farm supply stores. Then they should research uses and read up for themselves and make up their own opinion.
No one is ever going to convince anyone that has made up their own minds and that's just human nature. People would rather argue and fight for an idea (knowing it might be wrong) than to stand up and admit the truth.
Explaining to someone not sure is one thing but arguing with a person in denial is just useless. That's why I don't try to convince anyone, I state what I know and tell them to research for themselves and decide.
I get your point though, lol.
My point is just in how it's worded to people . Here we are in a thread talking about being in a debate with anti-vapers.
And someone pops up with PG is an antifreeze and there are a lot of antifreezes of which PG is just one.
It's not incorrect, but it's also not the only thing it does nor the only things it's good for or used in.. and its certainly a misleading way to describe PG to someone who doesn't vape, even if the statement itself wasn't incorrect.
We can explain better, and should at least attempt to better explain.
If vaping advocates say things in a manner that can mislead - well then who needs the antivapers?
When I first started vaping my husband told me I could breathe better because I was coating my lungs with petroleum products and oils..while not incorrect, its far from the best way to describe it either..
I just believe explaining something to people should be done correctly so as not to unwittingly mislead the ignorant.