So found this in a local news site. Don't know what to make of it. Any opinions? E-cigarettes may not significantly cut heart disease risk - The Economic Times
This is the Downside of e-Cigarettes that Isn't discussed much here.
That putting Nicotine into the Body can have Adverse Effects.
I believe that e-Cigarettes are Much Healthier than Smoking. And that there is Significant Harm Reduction. But it is still Harm Reduction and Not Harm Elimination.
True, true. The jury is still out on the long term effects of e-cigs. I guess you could say we are the beta testers of a new industry.
If this is true, then why did the FDA change it's position on nicotine patches, gum, inhaler's, etc and state that using them indefinitely is fine?
The other side of is that compared to smoking vaping may bring significant benefits to preventing heart disease.
Other studies have shown that it is the combination of nicotine and elevated levels of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide that cause heart disease in people.
Yes... In a way we Are the Beta Testers for a New Product. LOL
But one thing that Isn't new is Research on Nicotine and how it Effects the Body. It has been going on for a Long Time. A Long Time.
BTW - Haven't seen you around much. Good to see you again.
True again. No matter which way you cut the pie nicotine is nicotine regardless of the form of ingesting.
... It still has not been shown that nicotine when ingested in it's pure form contributes to heart disease.
If I am wrong I would like to hear about it. My info could be out of date.
F U D
Total BS...
The tests conducted used CSE. NOT pure nicotine.
What is CSE? LOL Cigarette SMOKE extract.
"PPCSE was prepared with modification of previously described method [20,21]. In brief, 10 cigarettes (Long Life™, Taiwan Tobacco and Liquor Production, Taipei, Taiwan; 0.9 mg nicotine/cigarette) were combusted and the smoke was sucked through a standard glass-fiber enabled Cambridge filter with a constant flow of 0.3 liters/min with an air compressor and this filter has been reported to trap > 99% of the smoke particulate matter [20]. The smoke filter was quickly dried with a hot plate and the raised weight in each filter was defined as the amount of PPCSE. On average, each cigarette smoke generated ~39.5 mg of PPCSE using this method. The PPCSE was dissolved by soaking the filter in DMSO for 30 min at room temperature. The solution containing PPCSE was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected and filtered using a 0.22-μm filter column (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The PPCSE stock solution (20 mg/ml of PPCSE containing 0.36 mg/ml of nicotine) was divided into microtubes (each 15 μl) and stored immediately at -80°C. Before each experiment, the frozen PPCSE stock solution was defrosted and further diluted to the desired concentration with cell medium. The quality of the PPCSE solution was assessed based on the absorbance at 302 nm, which is the specific absorption spectrum of peroxynitrite. Therefore, the concentration of DMSO in the testing solution was always < 1% to prevent possible cytotoxicity or other effects."
Horrible reporting, indeed!!
I
Why would we Assume that a Change in FDA Policy was done Solely Based on Health and or Scientific Reasons?
Why would you assume the opposite?
Because there is Money Involved.
Big Money.
That and I am Not Idealistic or Overly Emotional when it comes to something like e-Cigarettes.