ok from the look of it today is regulation day announcement, they have the 50 page report and they will release it today, flavors seem to be safe, not much else is known on evertyting else till tomorow afternoon
Articles & Discussions about the FDA ecig rules - The community needs to come together now more then ever
- Thread starter badkolo
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
The new fda regulations are simple and smart and now we can expand and become as big as we want and properly regulate them, todays news ensures gotvapes and other top vendors will be around for another decade
someone isnt happy the new regulations are pretty light
"Shame on the FDA," Sen. .... Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said Thursday. "Parents across America lost their best ally in protecting their kids from this insidious product."
FDA proposes to extend its tobacco authority to additional tobacco products, including e-cigarettes
"Shame on the FDA," Sen. .... Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said Thursday. "Parents across America lost their best ally in protecting their kids from this insidious product."
FDA proposes to extend its tobacco authority to additional tobacco products, including e-cigarettes
The Full Regulations have Not been Finalized. What people are seeing Today is just an Opening Salvo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...7c8684-ca39-11e3-93eb-6c0037dde2ad_story.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...7c8684-ca39-11e3-93eb-6c0037dde2ad_story.html
As stated previously, we understand that,
for some products, there may not be predicate products that were on the market as of February
15, 2007, to which to claim substantial equivalence. This may be particularly true for e-cigarettes
and similar novel products. For this reason, we are proposing that these manufacturers who
cannot use the SE pathway submit PMTAs to FDA no later than 24 months following the
effective date of the final rule. We are also proposing a 24-month compliance period for the
submission of SE reports. Therefore, FDA does not intend to initiate enforcement action against
products on the market for failing to have made an appropriate submission until 24 months
following the effective date of the final rule. If a manufacturer submits a PMTA or SE
application for its affected products within the 24-month time frame, FDA does not intend to
initiate action against those products for failing to have a marketing authorization unless and
until such a time as we have responded to the application.
manufactureres have 2 years form ruling to register products form 2007 on, that wont happen for another year or 2 then they have 2 years to do so, so we are looking at 3 to 4 years before any impact will happen with devices. They need to register the product and they will not stop sales of those products until after the 24 month period if they havent registered it.
for some products, there may not be predicate products that were on the market as of February
15, 2007, to which to claim substantial equivalence. This may be particularly true for e-cigarettes
and similar novel products. For this reason, we are proposing that these manufacturers who
cannot use the SE pathway submit PMTAs to FDA no later than 24 months following the
effective date of the final rule. We are also proposing a 24-month compliance period for the
submission of SE reports. Therefore, FDA does not intend to initiate enforcement action against
products on the market for failing to have made an appropriate submission until 24 months
following the effective date of the final rule. If a manufacturer submits a PMTA or SE
application for its affected products within the 24-month time frame, FDA does not intend to
initiate action against those products for failing to have a marketing authorization unless and
until such a time as we have responded to the application.
manufactureres have 2 years form ruling to register products form 2007 on, that wont happen for another year or 2 then they have 2 years to do so, so we are looking at 3 to 4 years before any impact will happen with devices. They need to register the product and they will not stop sales of those products until after the 24 month period if they havent registered it.
I don't think the Battle is going to be Waged over the Hardware side of e-Cigarettes.
Put a 510 thread on an LED and Every Mod can be Sold as a "Flashlight". And who can say that an RBA or Clearo is not going to used to Vaporize 0mg.
Heck... There is a Huge Market for Vaporizers that are used to Inhale a Substance that is Illegal in Most States. But people don't have any Problems buying them. And e-Cigarettes are Not going to be Illegal.
Where the Regulations are going to Effect People is Liquid e-liquids purchased over the Internet. Doing DIY Only works if a person can buy Liquid Nicotine Base.
Put a 510 thread on an LED and Every Mod can be Sold as a "Flashlight". And who can say that an RBA or Clearo is not going to used to Vaporize 0mg.
Heck... There is a Huge Market for Vaporizers that are used to Inhale a Substance that is Illegal in Most States. But people don't have any Problems buying them. And e-Cigarettes are Not going to be Illegal.
Where the Regulations are going to Effect People is Liquid e-liquids purchased over the Internet. Doing DIY Only works if a person can buy Liquid Nicotine Base.
excellent article...pertaining to our fight to keep vaping.....
Top scientists warn WHO not to stub out e-cigarettes
Top scientists warn WHO not to stub out e-cigarettes
- Status
Similar threads
