Well, it's about time I popped in and said hello (now that I've calmed down a little)...
Hi Guys, it's Ed from ciggy. As you may have seen, this ban has led me to close up shop.
I spent a lot of time yesterday & last night chatting with fellow e-smokers on the phone and have realised that I have a bit of fight left in me yet.
I don't believe trying to re-invent the wheel isn't going to change things but I'm hoping there may be a workable solution.
Prior to e-cigs, I had successfully given up analogues (for 14 months) using nicorette inhalers. (google "nicorette inhaler" to see what they look like and how they work).
They're harsh and in a word, clinical. They have a faint minty taste but more like an injection swab on the back of the throat delivering an instant hit of nicotine, they did the job of providing 10mg of nicotine over a 20 minute period if used non-stop. When used sparingly, after 2 hours the cartridge was useless unless you're into placebos!.
Of course, they lacked both flavour and vapour which is why I believe that e-cigs are so successful as a nicotine delivery method.
Now the way I understand things, the basis of the ban is on "unregulated" nicotine and also paraphernalia that is used to deliver "unregulated" nicotine.
Without being able to provide any definitive answers on what's allowed or not, I have an idea that's may be a compromise;
"Combining a government regulated nicotine delivery system with a personal vaporiser which provides flavour and vapour"
The point would be to only use a 0 nic mix of
tobacco Essence in a base of PG or VG and combine it on the inhale with the nicotine purchased through "government regulated" sources.
Does any of this make
sense yet?