ha, probably just as soon as someone steals my idea and copies it and mass produces it 
as I have said, I'm not developing this thing for resale or any commercial purposes on my end, I'm building it because I want it and it doesn't exist.
to me this concept is pretty simple and obvious, I'm surprised that there are not more innovations like this, I mean how many different expensive fancy engraved tubes do we really need? it seems that the industry is content on keep building the same thing over and over again, hundreds of different, yet basically the same simple tube mods, yet none that can actually close and not leak no matter how it is stored. if no one complains then the builders have no reason to change there way of building, is anyone actually asking for change? I know I am which is why I'm building this... of course stuff like the REO and the BB and all the other bottom feed mods are thinking outside the box too, well this is just my own thoughts on how it should be I guess
studiovap I did some math for you. I kind of just guessed that the max I can fit of 10mm piston with 5mm stroke would be way more than enough and I'd reduce to actual calculated values when I build the prototype. so I now did the actual calculations. the volume of the feed tube, assuming 1mm dia and 60mm long would be 188.5 cubic mm's of volume to completely fill it, the 10mm x 5mm stroke turns out that it would be waaay too much volume displaced, each pump would be over 1,000 cubic mm's of volume moved, so this of course needs to be reduced. as a better example: a 6mm piston with 2mm travel would displace 226.3 cubic mm's of volume, so this would probably be a better actual starting point, then it can be precisely calibrated to an exact desired volume via mechanically limiting the stroke with a set screw to adjust/fine tune and dial in the perfect feed. the fine tuning will also depend on the volume of the atty reservoir too but as you can see getting enough volume is not a problem at all. figuring this out is as easy as inputting your data here:
Calculating the Volume of a cylinder
theres an online calculator for everything it seems, so my "math" turned out to be pretty simple

as I have said, I'm not developing this thing for resale or any commercial purposes on my end, I'm building it because I want it and it doesn't exist.
to me this concept is pretty simple and obvious, I'm surprised that there are not more innovations like this, I mean how many different expensive fancy engraved tubes do we really need? it seems that the industry is content on keep building the same thing over and over again, hundreds of different, yet basically the same simple tube mods, yet none that can actually close and not leak no matter how it is stored. if no one complains then the builders have no reason to change there way of building, is anyone actually asking for change? I know I am which is why I'm building this... of course stuff like the REO and the BB and all the other bottom feed mods are thinking outside the box too, well this is just my own thoughts on how it should be I guess
studiovap I did some math for you. I kind of just guessed that the max I can fit of 10mm piston with 5mm stroke would be way more than enough and I'd reduce to actual calculated values when I build the prototype. so I now did the actual calculations. the volume of the feed tube, assuming 1mm dia and 60mm long would be 188.5 cubic mm's of volume to completely fill it, the 10mm x 5mm stroke turns out that it would be waaay too much volume displaced, each pump would be over 1,000 cubic mm's of volume moved, so this of course needs to be reduced. as a better example: a 6mm piston with 2mm travel would displace 226.3 cubic mm's of volume, so this would probably be a better actual starting point, then it can be precisely calibrated to an exact desired volume via mechanically limiting the stroke with a set screw to adjust/fine tune and dial in the perfect feed. the fine tuning will also depend on the volume of the atty reservoir too but as you can see getting enough volume is not a problem at all. figuring this out is as easy as inputting your data here:
Calculating the Volume of a cylinder
theres an online calculator for everything it seems, so my "math" turned out to be pretty simple
Last edited: