Catfish Atty Mods the next Chapter

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chowderhead1972

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2013
9,112
31,913
Clarksburg, Maryland, United States
A lot of the comments are more minor discrepancies in the prototype which also make an even stronger case for CNC vs manual production.
To answer a few questions:
The Production version CaM-r will have a threaded plug that will be removable without tools in the bottom of the mod. The bottle is removed through this opening but it also has a 1/4 slot inside the door to push the bottle out and to aid in re-aligning the tube and 510 connection.

Both 510s will be recessed to .1mm proud; meaning your 510 will stick up just enough to avoid atty swirl when used with attys bigger than 22mm.

Both use the same battery; 10.55wh

Both mods will have a carbon fiber inlay instead of the current stripe that's cut unto the cam-r.

Btw the finger/thumb choil is a functional part of the LBC, it acts as a thumb rest or pointer finger grip. I don't do pointless features.....

The jsst connector concept has been omitted. Without adding a bunch of plastic pieces it just doesn't work well.
 

Chowderhead1972

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Feb 19, 2013
9,112
31,913
Clarksburg, Maryland, United States
ive never really vaped much over 25-30 watts.mainly cuz im a mech guy.guess ill have to get schooled and learn how to do the right builds for higher wattage.the high watt stuff doesnt have to be in TC mode does it?i tried TC but it messed with my asthma.

I don't do temp control either; not so much for health reasons however, I just find I lack the time. Most of my attys have the original build in them, that just doesn't happen with TC.
 

fishwater

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 22, 2015
1,087
2,329
54
New Hampshire
Here's a dual coil Ti build in the Thump I did earlier in the week.
IMG_20160203_195659-1200x1287.jpg
 

distortoblotto

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 12, 2013
8,140
47,367
S.F/ Seattle
A lot of the comments are more minor discrepancies in the prototype which also make an even stronger case for CNC vs manual production.
To answer a few questions:
The Production version CaM-r will have a threaded plug that will be removable without tools in the bottom of the mod. The bottle is removed through this opening but it also has a 1/4 slot inside the door to push the bottle out and to aid in re-aligning the tube and 510 connection.

Both 510s will be recessed to .1mm proud; meaning your 510 will stick up just enough to avoid atty swirl when used with attys bigger than 22mm.

Both use the same battery; 10.55wh

Both mods will have a carbon fiber inlay instead of the current stripe that's cut unto the cam-r.

Btw the finger/thumb choil is a functional part of the LBC, it acts as a thumb rest or pointer finger grip. I don't do pointless features.....

The jsst connector concept has been omitted. Without adding a bunch of plastic pieces it just doesn't work well.

As from day one, count me all in for both...;)
 

distortoblotto

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 12, 2013
8,140
47,367
S.F/ Seattle
I don't do temp control either; not so much for health reasons however, I just find I lack the time. Most of my attys have the original build in them, that just doesn't happen with TC.

Switch back and forth myself. Been finding that my ni200 and Ti builds last a whole lot longer by tossing them in the sonic cleaner for a few once they drop off.
 

jhhollier

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 3, 2014
2,322
5,303
Bad news: The Petri 1.5 is sold out, consider the 1.5 list sold out.
Good news: The Petri 2.0 will be out very soon and we are already poised to get them at release.

View attachment 528775
Any idea of what the changes there will be between the 1.5 and 2? If you can divulge them that is.
 

Tamer El-Meehy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2014
3,632
16,115
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
Both look great actually. As a newbie to squonking I'm prone to oversquonking so the 2.1 appeals to me from this aspect. How do you pull out and insert the bottle on the 2.1 btw? I can't tell from the pictures. And are they the same width or is the 2.1 slightly wider?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

inspects

Squonkamaniac
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 15, 2014
4,455
10,798
Arizona, Ecuador
The LBC prints are done..... Off to the machine shop and carbon fiber laser cutter tomorrow for pricing and time frame estimates. Fingers crossed. Wooohooo! Now we are getting somewhere.
Has to be a great feeling finally getting that baby into production mode...!
 

Tamer El-Meehy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 30, 2014
3,632
16,115
Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
A lot of the comments are more minor discrepancies in the prototype which also make an even stronger case for CNC vs manual production.
To answer a few questions:
The Production version CaM-r will have a threaded plug that will be removable without tools in the bottom of the mod. The bottle is removed through this opening but it also has a 1/4 slot inside the door to push the bottle out and to aid in re-aligning the tube and 510 connection.

Both 510s will be recessed to .1mm proud; meaning your 510 will stick up just enough to avoid atty swirl when used with attys bigger than 22mm.

Both use the same battery; 10.55wh

Both mods will have a carbon fiber inlay instead of the current stripe that's cut unto the cam-r.

Btw the finger/thumb choil is a functional part of the LBC, it acts as a thumb rest or pointer finger grip. I don't do pointless features.....

The jsst connector concept has been omitted. Without adding a bunch of plastic pieces it just doesn't work well.
Aaah this answers my question on pulling out and inserting the bottle!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jhhollier

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 3, 2014
2,322
5,303
I wonder if they will add adjustable air on version 2.0?
That would be a good decision. I know a lot of people want an AFC on their attys. I usually just use mine wide open and change attys based on my airflow wants but it's still nice to have the option of AFC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread