Yes, they won, so there is some precedent. However it only applies because hana modz is trademarked now. Note I said vast majority do not have those protections. It is those very protections that allow Nike to take action on fakes.
That feeds into the morality argument; me saying anything but "Clones are bad" set you off to correct me. The idea behind my post was that no one is right or wrong. Also, it's a bit disingenuous to compare buying clones to buying blackmarket counterfeits. When you can only buy clone mods from shady street vendors that'll be more accurate
So making knockoffs with the brand, logos and packaging is ok, as long as one has not trademarked their name and logos?
You do know Kayfuns are trademarked, right?
SMtec GmbH is the owner of several trademarks and design protections in different markets around the world. In order to protect our customers, our partners and our company, we feel impelled to keep records on trademark infringements and to initiate legal actions against breaches without further warning. A breach is defined by using mentioned protected trademarks to advertise for and/ or the distribution of counterfeit products, as well as products using these trademarks, that have not been given permission to do so. A breach can and will be prosecuted retrospectively to the day the trademark has been filed.
In case you have a justified concern having committed a breach through no fault on your own or having bought a counterfeit product unwillingly or unintentionally or in case you want to report sales of counterfeits, please use the form down below to contact us for clarification.
SvoëMesto | Legal References
I think I will spend the rest of the day reporting US based vendors selling knockoff Kayfuns...
So where one buys the 'clones' has everything to do with legality and morality? If one gets a ...... on the street that is bad, but ok in a brothel...