Confiscated & Fine
- Thread starter fishohunter
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
-
- Tags
- provari
- Status
The last i check it costs $100+ to get started and the carts costs like $20 for 3 IIRC. most importantly they are marketed as a medical device which means big bro get dips for certifying it fit to sell in SG thereby allowing big pharma to market these in SG.
Boomz for big bro and big pharma.
Think about it:
- Big tobacco sells a product that will kill you when used as directed.
- Big pharma sells a product that gets u off what big tobacco sells(with well documented side effects)
- Big bro gets his hands in both pies.
Boomz for big bro. Choose wisely in 2016, Hougang have chosen. Have you chosen yours today?
The infamous 8 dollar bypass surgery e-diot...! EPIC...!
If my salary is as high as his, I can probably afford to hire the whole surgery team...
If my salary is as high as his, I can probably afford to hire the whole surgery team...
$8 was probably what he paid for his 1st outpatient visit. Being a high ranking civil servant I'm not surprise that one if his perks is subsidised inpatient treatment in a Class A ward. Throw in Medisave and Medishield he'll need to pay almost nothing for the surgery.
Hopefully the surgeon did fix the bypass that is called brains.
Hopefully the surgeon did fix the bypass that is called brains.
I chose lor. But lose by 1.3% lor. KNN!
Anyway, regardless the party, I have no faith in any party unless its the smokers party. Thing is the propaganda to promote discrimination against smokers started eons ago. Almost everyone who has never smoke, is discriminating those who does.
Seriously u want a smokers' party?
U have them in Niger where villagers have to walk 4km to buy 1kg of sugar but 2m to buy a pack of cigarettes; in Indonesia a 2yo kid is feeding a 40 stick/day habit and in 3rd world countries cigarettes are cheaper then candies.
Some tobacco companies allegedly smuggle their products to 3rd world countries just to circumvent customs duties.
Just because tobacco is a very lucrative source of income for governments, no country in the world has declared an outright ban on it though the closest are the aussies with the new packaging laws.
IMO insurance companies are not doing a moral duty by insuring smokers because they are using a product that will cause premature diseases and death when used as directed.
Health care bills are increasing annualy for tobacco related diseases and this will only fatten whoever owns Singhealth and NHG thereby increasing cashflow in the left-pocket/right-pocket theory.
My dream is to see an outright ban on tobacco products in the future when one government has the bawls to say NO. Of course that does not include vaping.
U have them in Niger where villagers have to walk 4km to buy 1kg of sugar but 2m to buy a pack of cigarettes; in Indonesia a 2yo kid is feeding a 40 stick/day habit and in 3rd world countries cigarettes are cheaper then candies.
Some tobacco companies allegedly smuggle their products to 3rd world countries just to circumvent customs duties.
Just because tobacco is a very lucrative source of income for governments, no country in the world has declared an outright ban on it though the closest are the aussies with the new packaging laws.
IMO insurance companies are not doing a moral duty by insuring smokers because they are using a product that will cause premature diseases and death when used as directed.
Health care bills are increasing annualy for tobacco related diseases and this will only fatten whoever owns Singhealth and NHG thereby increasing cashflow in the left-pocket/right-pocket theory.
My dream is to see an outright ban on tobacco products in the future when one government has the bawls to say NO. Of course that does not include vaping.
No. I don't want a pro smoking party, but I think we need ppl who understand and empathize with smokers. We are out numbered, we will always be discriminated as long as we can puff smoke like compound from our mouth.
Wah damn scary...... i read this post.... Heartache... Honestly i wonder which idiots voted PAPPY in again..... seriously....
The 60% didn't realise that no matter what their MPs say in the parliament they still have to toe the party line when it comes to voting on policies.
If you didn't realise when the casinos issue was put forth in parliament the Party Whip wasn't lifted.
The ratio between ruling party and opposition MP is not healthy... As long as the ruling party boss want something, which one of their MP can say otherwise...? Even if opposition MP says no, the ruling party will probably just say, "You not happy? Sue me lor..."
That happened b4 if i not wrong.Got one from hammer kena sue until very jialat.When no money after kena sue how run e parti.After kicking 0thers down e hill so others cann0t conquer,only they can.But people are not dumb,everyone gonna burn the grasses...
You mean back in those days??
Tang Liang Hong and JBJ?
Nowadays politician are different..Clever especially those few from WPs..They make sure they have official sources and facts to backup what they claim over the rally..
They wont wana head into the kangaroo court here.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
