Did I find 75mg liquid?

Status
Not open for further replies.

DaBrat

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 22, 2009
745
9
Back end of GA
www.myspace.com
OOPS, I misread it.

75mg cut down to 36mg would be about 60ml at $.80 per ml + the cost of the PG and/or VG. Just a bit over premixed juice. But then again, it would be available after a ban.

May work for light vapors (like me) at 18 who could cut it again. 12 bucks for 30 ml of smoke juice. I wouldn't chance it unless there was a ban.
 

Ridewithme38

Moved On
Jun 22, 2009
323
2
45
Guys don't think about the price per ml because we haven't seen anything of this strength before...TW will be coming out with a 54mg juice how much do you think they're going to charge for it...there is a premium for high strength high quality US made eliquid...

I'm thinking about buying this in bulk and just cutting it with flavor and sellling it as 73-70mg/ml juice
 

geeker

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 12, 2009
1,418
55
Neither here nor there
Guys don't think about the price per ml because we haven't seen anything of this strength before...TW will be coming out with a 54mg juice how much do you think they're going to charge for it...there is a premium for high strength high quality US made Eliquid...

I'm thinking about buying this in bulk and just cutting it with flavor and sellling it as 73-70mg/ml juice

You will have some pretty weak flavor if you're cutting 75 mg unflavored to 70 mg flavored.
 

el lobo furtivo

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 12, 2009
161
114
Akron, OH
Actually, this is probably exactly the way to get around the FDA. I'm pretty sure I remember someone suggesting just this in another thread. Sell nicotine as a 'pesticide' or for 'research purposes' without any mention of e-cigs and with the same disclaimer that's on the front page of the website and the FDA can't do a thing. Pretty smart, really.

On the other hand, somebody should probably delete this thread. I'm sure the FDA cronies troll these boards and there's no need to provoke them. :)
 

Talen

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2009
258
97
East Coast U.S.A/Thailand
Actually, this is probably exactly the way to get around the FDA. I'm pretty sure I remember someone suggesting just this in another thread. Sell nicotine as a 'pesticide' or for 'research purposes' without any mention of e-cigs and with the same disclaimer that's on the front page of the website and the FDA can't do a thing. Pretty smart, really.

On the other hand, somebody should probably delete this thread. I'm sure the FDA cronies troll these boards and there's no need to provoke them. :)

I don't know about research purpose but if you sell nicotine as a pesticide you will definitely need a license.
 

Lika

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 6, 2009
517
1
Dallas - USA
Somebody's going to research this and post it here so it might as well be me... lol

BlipLabs.com was registered on June 10, 2009 under a private registration. The website says:

Please pardon any inconvenience caused by our website redesign, we hope that our new site should be online and operational in the very near future.

However, as our dedication to our clients and the research that they perform is the most important thing to us here at Blip Labs, we have decided to leave the shop portion of our site online through the redesign. We have always understood that smaller research groups, graduate students and other educational organizations are often unable to afford large quantities of nicotine and nicotine solutions...

They say 'always' yet they have no internet history. Give no address and I can't find them in them in the phone book. Seems to me that at least one of those would pop up somewhere for a real laboratory that has always been there for its clients.

Yes, my skepticism is showing and if I had a physical address I'd knock on their door (maybe - depends on the neighborhood, lol) and say, "Hey, wassup?"

I really could care less if it's a real lab or not. I just want to know if I send someone $20, $40 or $75 I'm getting a legitimate product. I live very close to that zip code listed on their site. For all I know it could be my neighbor in the apartment next door.

Btw, I went through the checkout process without submitting payment and there was no shipping charges or taxes on my order. Maybe they were gonna walk over and drop it off since I'm in the area... hehe.
 

Technocrat

Full Member
Dec 12, 2008
47
1
It does seem like a way to circumvent the the coming FDA vapeapocalypse. The devices and the liquid will be fine, only the nicotine will be controllable by the FDA.

What makes me think this site is fishy (which I admire) is that they don't sell anything else. There are dozens of research chemical sites on the web and they all sell multiple chemicals (check out Tocris). Only a wholeseller selling to one of those sites (in large batches) would sell just one chemical. Just to be fair nicotine is a very valid research chemical, being the primary nicotonic acetylcholine agonist.

This thread SHOULD NOT be deleted, nowhere on that site does it say 'vape this'. The FDA can to nothing to them based on what we say here. It would be like denying someone gas because someone else is an arsonist. I suppose in the far future the FDA/DEA could require permits to buy nicotine like they do for ....... (yes, you can buy cocain as a research chemical, although you should see the dang permits you need.)

FINALLY: PLEASE TRY THE STUFF DILUTED IN SOMETHING ELSE FIRST. Like 1 drop in 1ml of low nic juice. I don't care if your programming or titrating 'off by one' errors can turn 75mg juice into 750mg juice. And remember vaping can take a while to fully enter your system (like 20 minutes), so don't take another 30 puffs because you felt nothing in the first 5 minutes. ;)

Please keep us up to date!
 

fresca

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 11, 2009
198
4
At the end of their "agreement" or "disclaimer" on their home page, it states:

If you are affiliated with or working for any government agency or any other product related agency on this site either directly or indirectly, or any other related group or were formally a worker, you cannot enter this web site, cannot access any of its resources and you cannot view any of the html files. If you enter this site, you are not agreeing to these terms and you are violating code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act signed by Bill Clinton in 1995 and that means that you cannot threaten our ISP(s) or any person(s) or company storing these files, and cannot prosecute any person(s) affiliated with this page which includes family, friends or individuals who run or enter this web site.

Unfortunately, that's a load of garbage.

There is no "Internet Privacy Act".

The Internet Privacy Act is a non-existent and fictitious law cited by websites that conduct illegal activities in order to deter organizations that look to prosecute such activities. Networks which share music, films and software, for example, often display the fictitious act in an attempt to protect themselves from arrest by being able to claim entrapment in court. In the statement, websites claim that it prevents organizations which may be associated with anti-P2P or government organizations from entering the site or network as it would breach the terms of the act.

According to the statement which many sites display, it was signed by Bill Clinton in 1995, but in reality he never signed the act as it never existed. Using this and other such "disclaimers" would actually make it easier for such a site to be found via the major search engines.

Reference: Internet Privacy Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DaMulta

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 18, 2009
2,300
11
45
T-Town Oklahoma
I think it's legit, and there are many chemical companies in the US. They may want to get in on the E-Liquid without getting in on it.

They also may want to see it for other reasons. I have found it at other sites, and just not like this. However in the other thread it was said that up to 7% in the UK you don't need a license, or anything to handle it. The same could be for the US.


I think the site owner is just trying to cover himself, or herself in the best way they could see fit.
 

geeker

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 12, 2009
1,418
55
Neither here nor there
I order, use, combine, analyze and inventory chemicals at work most of the day. No chemical company I have ever done business with:
A-has the same lot number on various mixtures
B-uses a highlighter to indicate what's in the bottle
C-posts a picture of a bottle of chemicals (usually all you see is the CAS number, MSDSheets, molecular weight, yadayada)

At least they put a hazard and handling diamond up.
 

Lika

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 6, 2009
517
1
Dallas - USA
Last edited by a moderator:

Kewtsquirrel

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 21, 2009
455
3
DFW, TX
moddersupply.com
They sent me a tracking number shortly after 5pm local time, along with an email apologizing for an error in their payment system not charging shipping and requested I send them 1/2 of the shipping cost ($3), and that they would cover the half for the inconvenience - its slated to be delivered tomorrow. The internet privacy act thing doesn't mean a damned thing to me, if the chemicals are as advertised thats the only thing I care about.

I don't care about labeling either, labels are expensive, and kudos to them if they can figure out a way to cut down on costs (and hopefully, reduce the price so I can cut down on mine too).

I'll post pics and a review tomorrow, but everything looked legit to me, and that earns my money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread