And yet, THIS IS OK????^^^
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
How about this:
And yet, THIS IS OK????^^^
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
How about this:
It's always funny to me how disgusted by "pink slime" people are, as if humans haven't been eating sausages for a couple thousand years. It's really just a highly efficient form of sausage.
I posted this to Reddit and it was down voted into oblivion literally within 5 minutes. So many vapers have their heads in the sand that it really makes me frustrated with the community. I really feel this issue, if not corrected, is going to be the downfall of the entire industry (yes, it's that serious).
Because................What can you expect from a community that will go completely ape .... over a wick material based on pseudo science and wild conjecture, but repeatedly turn a blind eye to vaping liquids containing toxic chemicals proven to be dangerous that are completely avoidable and unnecessary?

It's always funny to me how disgusted by "pink slime" people are, as if humans haven't been eating sausages for a couple thousand years. It's really just a highly efficient form of sausage.
It would be interesting to hear what coronors have to say about all this. If anyone would know it would be them. I haven't heard a peep.
It's been pc these days for governments to advertise the harmful effects of smoking by displaying pictures of damaged lungs from deceased people who smoked. I'm pretty sure most people have seen these images.
As it is i haven't seen any similar images related to vaping being displayed by anyone.
The evidence that has been provided to the global community about the harm that is caused by smoking is overwhelming and has become fundamentally understood as the results from smoking tobacco. The images are very graphic, the adverts are very memorable. There is no doubt about the damage smoking causes.
Where are the government health warnings for e liquids ?. Where are the graphic images of vital organs damaged by the use of e liquids ?. I would expect the same kind of negative advertising for vaping as tobacco gets. I'm not seeing that. I haven't seen anything of the kind. What is happening is that there are a lot of people, i mean a whole load of people, who are talking about it, but that's all, just talking, talking talking talking, and yes.....more talking, but no physical evidence such as that which could be provided by a coroner, a coroners report would do !.
I want to see images of the damage that is done to a vapers lungs. The same kind of images that we are shown on tv and, in the uk, on cigarette packets. If the kind of damage which is caused by vaping isn't as visable as the damage caused by smoking is then i'd appreciate and respect the findings of whatever evidence a coroner can provide.
If there were any evidence, i have absolutely no doubt we would have seen this before now.
I think we already touched on the fact that we both love sweet vapes. (not the vendor, though I love them too!) I find it really helpful, to have something really sweet to vape; it allows me to choose less outrageous items for *actual* snacks, something that might be good for me as well as tasty -- now that it's summer, I expect we'll be enjoying some canteloupe soon!
I've even tried to interest my mom in vaping 0mg; she's a former smoker, finally was able to quit using every form of NRT known to man, pre-vaping, but she says when she's paying the bills, she craves a cigarette desperately, even after 10 yrs -- yet she still had the nerve to say to me, "if *I* can quit, anyone can."I thought that something really sweet, without nicotine, might assuage both her smoke and sweet craving -- the latter didn't really develop till after she quit smoking, but now she eats candy like there's no tomorrow -- and hence, for her, there won't be a real lot of them.
She absolutely won't hear of it, refuses to consider anything but her own thoughts on anything, always; it's sad to realize when one's maturity level has outstripped that of a parent.
She does find the smell of my vape pleasant, which is nice considering some of the horror stories I've read around here of loved ones who find the "smell" (what smell? a bakery???) of vapor unpleasant.
Andria
And in cigarette smoke, there's something like 4,000 chemicals, most of them toxic, some of them carcinogenic. It's positively ghastly, and for about the last 20 or 30 yrs of the 39 that I smoked, I wondered if I was truly insane or what; I tried to put thosedown, more than once, and for me it was just impossible -- till vaping. They ain't taking that away from me, no way, no how, no sir. 4 yrs of nicotine in the freezer right now.
Andria
maybe he meant they used some chemicals to smooth out the taste of other chemicals? lol
I don't know.. but I don't put ANYTHING past them
I'm not one of those to say we all smoked for years, why do we care so much about flavorings in vaping. I did start vaping as a safer alternative, so yes, I would like to be as safe as I am comfortable with. The problem with reacting to information like "this liquid contains xxxng of diketones" is, we don't really know what that means. Yes, some want to eliminate any unnecessary risks, but ALL of vaping is an "unnecessary" risk. When you take anything to extremes, or start calling companies out on something, you had better have some factual information, concerning exactly what we're using in the way we're using it, otherwise you're not doing anyone any favors.
So a liquid contains x amount of diacetyl, how much does the vapor contain? How much is absorbed from the vapor? We need to know these things, not only for the ingredients we believe to be of concern, but so that we can extrapolate to the other ingredients, in case any of them become concerning. Research, innovation, and knowledge do not happen in a stagnant environment.
Hi Andria, yes true. Sure you do, Lol ! Understand, makes alot of sense. That's what I'm talkin about, love cantelope. Let me know if you've whipped up a recipe.
Congrat's to your mom. She must have been a heavy smoker, to make such a comment. Well, your mom may fear vaping, will kick off the smoking habit again. Hopefully in the future, she chooses to vape over an analog. Fruity flavors are pleasant to smell, my mom is a non smoker and loves the smell of fruity flavors. Well, some in society disapprove anything and everything.
Nah, I really don't think she'll ever smoke again, because she quit once, started back, and had to do it all over again, and just like for me, it was harder the 2nd time. She has so many different things wrong with her health, there's no way she could take herself to the store and buy them, and I'm just about certain my stepfather would never go for it -- she already has to go in the hospital at least yearly to get her fluid levels down, when it starts to affect her COPD-lungs. She's in a wheelchair and no longer drives; she can barely get out of it to go to the bathroom or dress herself. So you see I have an excellent anti-role-model; she's always been that for me -- whatever she would do, I try to do just the opposite, and it usually works out pretty well.
Andria
Goodness, sorry to read of all the complications your mom has to endure with health, wishing her well through her health journey. Your not alone, felt the same way about my parents![]()

Well last weekend I reminded her that she had to get COPD before she would quit smoking; she had to get cirrhosis before she would quit drinking; and since she's already diabetic, did she need to get dead before she'd knock it off with the sugar? And also pointed out that I love her more than she loves sugar, and she should keep that in mind the next time she's about to stick some candy or pancakes and syrup or cookies or fruit that's been so heavily sugared it's turned into syrup in her mouth. I really hope she was listening.
Andria
You should follow your own advice before you start handing it out to others. Eliminating all the conjecture would help too.Read the article the link takes you to. Then follow all the links and references sited at the end of the article if your panties are still in a bunch.
You're going to have to actually read... and use the internet... and follow reference links... and stuff.
Your bolded quote is like saying alcohol causes cirrhosis of the liver. The statement is meaningless without context, such as knowing how much and how often it's ingested or inhaled. Remember, the dose makes the poison. It most certainly doesn't back up your statement that I quoted."Another property is that diacetyl may inhibit ion transport across respiratory epithelia (Fedan et al. 2006). The most prominent adverse health effect associated with diacetyl exposure is what has been commonly referred to as 'popcorn lung' disease. Specifically, it leads to otherwise rare and irreversible constrictive bronchiolitis obliterations (chronic scarring and severe narrowing of the bronchiole airways) (Hubbs et al. 2008). This inflammation and obstruction, if severe enough, ultimately requires lung transplant to avoid potential suffocation."
It appears we need a body count, and even then some in the community will bury there heads in the sand. Ignorance is such bliss. At the very least there is a very real potential risk. Anyone who denies that is in la la land, and it is a completely unnecessary one.What can you expect from a community that will go completely ape .... over a wick material based on pseudo science and wild conjecture, but repeatedly turn a blind eye to vaping liquids containing toxic chemicals proven to be dangerous that are completely avoidable and unnecessary?