Cool! Thanks for the education, tannerk
Second, other sites doing re-prints. As you can see, in 24 hours, NYDaylyNews.com (6mil hits/mo), Canada.com (.75 mil hits/mo), tobacco.org already picked it up. Within a month, you'll see hundreds, if not thousands re-prints clogging up the Net with "distorted, incomplete and misleading statements of FDA" + "electronic cigarette" and variations thereof.
Third, is exposure. Thousands saw it yesterday, and will continue to see it for weeks to come. DIGG is also monitored by major news organization. If story cracks page one, it's obviously worth the air time. Many "investigative journalism" stories are born on DIGG. The chance of major network doing a followup is much grater than it was 24 hours ago.
Sadly, many potential new users will have made up their minds with the initial FDA story. There is an adage in the media of "accusation, page one - retraction page 27" Unless (as you mention) the story gets close to the same press as the original story (sequals are rarely as popular) then we're still coming in second in the war.
Of course it is still a fantastic volley!
I heard this story yesterday on NPR & thought it was a reasonably fair look at the issue-
E-Cigarettes: The New Frontier In War On Smoking
I have no intention of wading through all these posts, but can tell you from personal experience that e-smoking could not have a better friend than Dr. Elizabeth Whelan. I first began reading her many years ago, when I was health editor at a major newspaper. Always, she was on-target, the voice of reason is a world of faddish crap and "alternative" junk stuff.
She is respected. Believe that.
Get the ICU Dr on the bandwagon and share his views!! We need more Dr's involved!!The ICU doctor I work for just asked me to buy her one for her daughter. The daughter is ecstatic!
Can we digg Whalen feature article?
Can we digg Whalen feature article? This sort of thing needs to be encouraged--no matter the source--if media gets wind of the popularity of the e-cig, they will do positive stories. Emma P.S. Best one I have tried so far is called "PureSmoker," but I don't know if it's the same as the one on the online site. Got it at my local smoke shop--the atomizer gets changed every 10 cartridges--it puffs good and no problem so far. Don't know the "style of, whether 901 or whatever. Kinda long. Emma been lurking, this my first post