"What we tend to forget is that addiction is caused by someone LIKING something so much that they overdo."
@Kena: I'll start here. I have worked as an addiction counselor, and I have been in recovery for 9 years+... This is a dangerous and wholly inaccurate description of addiction. Addiction is caused by chemical changes in the brain that can happen to someone after using a substance one time, or not at all... It has nothing to do with whether or not, or how much, someone "likes" a given substance. Addiction is a disease, not a choice. Your position on this topic, if your position is in fact indicated by your statement, is ignorant, and part of the larger problem with addiction treatment in this country. I mean no offense by this, my apologies if any was taken.
@everyone else... I see no problem with "some" regulation. That being said, as some have mentioned, it is a pandora's box of sorts, and it's hard to tell where it would end up. I find it hard to believe that any sensible member of ECF would believe that this isn't where we've all been headed for a while now, though. The writing has been on the wall for some time, complaining about it won't do any good. The industry has gotten too big, there's just too much money in it, and you better believe that when that happens the government is going to get their piece. It never fails.
I don't see the FDA going the route of classifying ecigs as "medicines" though, because that would open up too many other issues. One thing no one is talking about is the fact that classifying ecigs as such would have many consequences. One of which would be that Doctors could potentially have to "precribe" ecig devices/liquid/etc... That would open up ecig gear/liquid/etc... to being covered by insurance. If there is a lobby in this country that can compete with big tobacco, it's the insurance lobby, and you better believe that they wouldn't accept fiscal responsibility for this without a fight.
It's a long road ahead with regards to regulation. I, for one, don't have a problem with a safer product. Yes, it is fraught with the potential negative consequences of the unknown... and it is a slippery slope. You can count on one thing for sure: The government is going to get a bigger chunk of the ecig pie, it's just a matter of how they do it. We would be naive to think anything different. The questions that remain are whether the changes that are certain to come will end up having positive or negative consequences for the product, the economic impact, and the community. Time will tell.
ps. Nothing in this post was intended to offend anyone. My apologies if anything had that effect.