Ok..."eGo Type Models" needs a NAME...
I'm sorry: which category would that be? "...." needs a NAME.
Missed that.......Ohhhhh! Of course... no name, right! My bad.
haaaaa.
Just kidding, but, then again, we have already coined many entrys which are being adopted and are effective to the referential agenda. Nevertheless, I guess going for the 'ultimate wording choice' is harmless and could be a smart move. Just guessing if we dont hurry the 'winner' might end up picking dust in the Official Records shelves... Meaning, I am with you Don, but I think in this case language might be taking the 'descriptive' natural path rather than 'precriptive' one.
I am really fond of some of your choices, and I also have some entires of my own which I'd like to share. In most cases there are some reasons for my selection including technical references and/or shape factor; object-similarities; etc. Sometimes they are acronyms, but in a few cases its 'just because'; cause it sounds catchy. I wont include the meanings but if you gimme feedback maybe I could fill you in on them from there.
Ok: All of them are affixed as preffixes to the word 'model':
drama (my personal favourite);
Hybrid;
"Roundy/ie";
Roll(ie);
Log(e);
supra-batt;
para-batt;
sticko;
phat ...;
And last but not least: "Day-tripper".
PS: Sorry if some have been already suggested!