Done..!
This was my response to the last question (Something like, "What would you like to tell people who are researching the e-cig", something on those lines... damn... I just took the survey, and already forgot...

...where was I ...? ...can I help you?? Oh, right!! The response! What was the key combo for 'Paste', again?
"From personal experience, the e-cigarette is much more effective in keeping people away from
tobacco than other NRT's, because it adresses the behavioral aspect of smoking habit. Unlike other NRT's, it should be regarded more like an effective alternative to cigarettes (a much safer one), rather than a 'quit cigarettes therapy'. Therefore, it should not be subject to medicalization, which would only make it LESS available for current smokers who might want to try it in a new attempt to quit
tobacco. By the same reasoning, it should also not be heavily regulated as a tobacco product: the liquid the e-cig vaporises can be available with NO nicotine, and the health risks associated with tobacco (the main reason for heavy tobacco regulation) are not associated with the e-cig. To keep the e-cig widely available for those who may need it's help, it should be classified as a consumer product - obviously, with the adequate quality control usually associated with those products - but NOT with the unnecessary and excessive burden of pharmalogical standards, or the excessive restrictions associated with harmful tobacco."