I tried putting 200 but the highest default was 150.....so I went with that. Hey! I'm retired and don't have much to do most daysIt's possible.....
150 x 10 = 1500/60 = 25
vaping for 25 hours a day. You are dedicated. Lol
Electronic Cigarette Survey
- Thread starter kathi17
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
150 x 10 = 1500/60 = 25
vaping for 25 hours a day. You are dedicated. Lol
Dr. Wilson has done other studies regarding electronic cigarettes...
Neural correlates of craving in electronic cigarette users — SLEIC
Also might be interesting to note that njoy has a link to the survey on their website...
NJOY Electronic cigarette NJOY SURVEY
Actually, I've been doing some posting there today...BTW - Good to See you Out of the OUTSIDE.
It is a Kinda a Dark Place. Glade to see you are Back where the Sun Shines.
But I'm picking and choosing my words very carefully.
Those guys are like a school of piranhas and I don't want to get nicked.
I took the survey also. I added in remarks that they think we vape like we used to smoke. I don't and take a vape whenever I feel like it not 15 puffs in a row. I may take a couple of vapes now and then a couple more 15 minutes later. It irritates me they look at it like cigs. Of course I'm retired and don't have to worry about timing of anything.
I gotta admit, I was impressed with the informed content of the questions, not the typical clumsy verbiage you might expect from an academic survey ...
Well worth the time and effort, hope it results in some positive conclusions ...
Well worth the time and effort, hope it results in some positive conclusions ...
I took it...it was similar to one i took a year or so ago, enough so that by the end i wasn't sure if i'd taken it before. i hope it's a new survey (and yeah, i let them know in the comments i might be a repeater)
Jonathan Foulds is one of the other researchers associated with the study. He's done credible research in the past and is pro harm reduction, so i'm comfortable thinking that the results won't be twisted.
Jonathan Foulds is one of the other researchers associated with the study. He's done credible research in the past and is pro harm reduction, so i'm comfortable thinking that the results won't be twisted.
They will probably figure out I'm math illiterate.
nah... probably just think you threw a wild guess out like the rest of us who just sit around tallying up our puff counts on spread sheets every night before bed.
The impression I get from most of these surveys is they think you are addicted to the ecig and a lot of the questions are designed that way to prove a point. They don't seem to know much about vaping as in the 15 puff thing per use. I would like to see more informed vapors involved in the questions not just researchers who don't have a clue.
Actually, I've been doing some posting there today...
But I'm picking and choosing my words very carefully.
Those guys are like a school of piranhas and I don't want to get nicked.
Yeah... the OUTSIDE is a Dark Place where Vultures sit on Tree Branches waiting for a Hapless Victim to walk by. And the "One who Shall Not Be Mentioned" is in EVERY Thread looking for a Fight.
But that is why the OUTSIDE Exists. To keep the Fighting and the Bulling of the Cartel away from the Rest of the ECF. I like to think of it as the Radioactive Shielding in the Containment Vessel. Without it, the Radiation would seep into these Threads.
Much Better here don't you agree?
LOL
Hopefully I 'skewed' their leading edge mentality when I responded that I've responded to at least a dozen previous surveys.
Will say that it was one of the better surveys in a while. Let's see how the 'numbers' fall out in their report...
Will say that it was one of the better surveys in a while. Let's see how the 'numbers' fall out in their report...
Actually, I've been doing some posting there today...
But I'm picking and choosing my words very carefully.
Those guys are like a school of piranhas and I don't want to get nicked.
BTW - Way to Go on hitting the 17K Mark.
Hopefully I 'skewed' their leading edge mentality when I responded that I've responded to at least a dozen previous surveys.
Will say that it was one of the better surveys in a while. Let's see how the 'numbers' fall out in their report...
And you Also Iffy with 7K.
Way to Go.
Yeah, I am. So what? Would it be preferable for me to be addicted to "traditional cigarettes" instead? 'Cause that's pretty much the choice.
I too had a hard time with that one. I put 48 since the suggestion said something about a smoke lasting 10 minutes. I figured 4 times an hour, times a 12 hour day. 4x12=48
All in all a very well written survey.
I put 150
Math was never my strong suit.
What?!?! Think that number is too high?
Heh - they'll figure it out, hopefully, and drop the data for that question.
Reminds me of a test in college where everyone failed when an essay question counted for half your score. The professor worded the question so badly that everyone went in a very different direction than what she wanted. When the results came out she was actually rather ...... everyone answered incorrectly - and the rest of that class was spent discussing what was the point of her question. She finally relented when she was made to realize why no one gave her the answer she was expecting. The test didn't count in our final grades for that class.
They are not sponsoring it - they are doing the same thing that the OP did here - spreading the word. They have a dog in the race just as each of us does. Good, bad or otherwise it's going to apply.
NJOY SIMPLY SAID:
"Researchers from Penn State University (lead investigator: Stephen Wilson) are conducting an online survey to improve understanding of electronic cigarettes."
"If you are an electronic cigarette user, you may complete the survey anonymously, or can provide contact details at the end if interested in participating in a laboratory study of electronic cigarette use."
Senile Old Man Don
Oh they Definitely have a Dog in the Race. And some Dogs are Bigger and Can Run Faster.
Back in the Day, I think Many people pinned their Hopes on NJoy to be someone who would "Fight" for the Vaping Community when it came to the Fair Use of e-Cigarettes.
And I think Many of those people feel Let Down Today.
It could be argued that NJoy is the only reason that electronic cigarettes are not medical devices right now.
In fact it would be awfully hard to argue otherwise.
So what the hell is up with them lobbying for that status in Canada?
Why the change in tune?
I can't say for sure, but it is a pretty safe bet that it has to do with money.
And while NJoy may not have gone public yet, they do now have some big investors to satisfy.
I've seen good companies get built through doing the right thing... and change completely after going public.
In fact it would be awfully hard to argue otherwise.
So what the hell is up with them lobbying for that status in Canada?
Why the change in tune?
I can't say for sure, but it is a pretty safe bet that it has to do with money.
And while NJoy may not have gone public yet, they do now have some big investors to satisfy.
I've seen good companies get built through doing the right thing... and change completely after going public.
- Status
Similar threads
