I think it comes down to the concept that the definition of “safe” is a variable not a constant. By “knowing what they are doing” they are, at least in their own minds, reducing their risk to a level they consider safe for them. Or at least for you.I've read the same comment in this thread that i've read in many previous threads in the past; 'using a battery at 30% over the CDR is not dangerous if you know what you're doing'.... and similar words of wisdom.
What does that even mean ?
So knowing it's dangerous makes it less dangerous ? It's not dangerous because i know the dangers ? Exceeding the manufacturers advice is ok because i know better than the people who actually make the product ?
Nonsensical.
Irrelevant and mostly off-topic. AFAIK Mooch only changed "exploding" to "bursting" (that is, with regards to short-circuiting a battery) to not cause people to start to needlessly overreact. Batteries, even if they're flat top, these days have built-in protections such as the PTC, CID, and slow-down mechanisms in the separator, but not all of them do, or they don't have all of these protections present, and, even if we could assume all of them are present, they might still fail and cause the occasional (i.e., rare) thermal runaway that explains why these typical round cells we use for vaping never were designed to be used outside a fully protected battery pack with a protection circuit. Thermal runaway is what causes fire and explosions, and should not be confused with battery venting. If all we had to be concerned about was battery venting, then we wouldn't need to look specifically for less volatile battery chemistry types. The effects of thermal runaway can be pretty devastating. Just because it happens only rarely is no good reason to ignore it.Not quite, though close. I am assuming that anti-cigarette activists backed by massive funding from the tobacco and pharmaceutical industries are going to claim it. I also think that assumption of spontaneous voluntary self education and the following of common sense safety rules is not something the government does any more. On either the right or the left. Which means I think that the anti-vaping activists will almost certainly win if steps are not taken. The gold standard of safety regulation is “did someone die?” Plane crashes, automobile safety, the number of legs on office chairs, electrical code, all of it is done using that standard. Regulation is generally written in blood.
Someone died.
The question is no longer whether anything needs to be done at all or not. The question is what needs to be done.
Usually I want to ban stupidity from the vaping world. Only sometimes, I change my mind and want to release the Kraken.I do not want to ban anything related to vaping
A lot of people have wanted to ban stupidity in general for a very long time. Can’t be done though. Everyone is stupid some of the time, even when they think they’re not. It might even be said that stupidity is at its most dangerous when people think it’s not there.Usually I want to ban stupidity from the vaping world. Only sometimes, I change my mind and want to release the Kraken.![]()
The reason why I feel safer using a mech is because I trust my own brain more than I trust the vagueries of some Chinese chipmaker. Internal battery charging is what caused the mod in the example video to be turned into a scary fireball explosion in the middle of the night, which you claimed was not possible, when the reality is that the thing that's not possible is internal battery charging in a mech so yeah... "believe" is definitely the key word in that sentence...What becomes a variable is how common people believe human fallibility is.
Maybe Mooch knows what that one guy had been smoking.That one guy is impressively calm.
There's a difference between knowing what you're doing and thinking you know what you're doing. The simple fact you didn't know regulated mods could explode speaks volumes of which part applies to you.By “knowing what they are doing” they are, at least in their own minds, reducing their risk to a level they consider safe for them.
That's been my whole point in my first reply to this thread, i.e., regulated mods are causing people to stupidly think they are safe, and, the stupidity of that is what makes them most dangerous. Most. As in, more dangerous than mech mods, contrary to popular stupid belief.It might even be said that stupidity is at its most dangerous when people think it’s not there.
That's been my whole point in my first reply to this thread, i.e., regulated mods are causing people to stupidly think they are safe, and, the stupidity of that is what makes them most dangerous. Most. As in, more dangerous than mech mods, contrary to popular stupid belief.
I use a regulated mod with vents. But that's me.Just how much risk these present depends on their design. I'd rather use a well-vented mech mod than a regulated mod that has the potential to turn into a pipe bomb.
I tried that one on my boss once when assigned to track down a problem that COULD NOT be recreated. Far as I could tell, same inputs gave different-from-the-issue (and correct) output each time I tried it. Yet something happened. Once.One example is computer memory: computer memory can be affected by cosmic rays. It doesn’t happen very often, but it has happened.
I never claimed using a battery at 30% over the CDR is not dangerous if you know what you're doing. Instead, I merely said I trust people who vape their mech at 30% over the CDR more than I trust those who are persisting all the stupid "let's just ban mechs and keep believing we are safest" online bruhaha.I've read the same comment in this thread that i've read in many previous threads in the past; 'using a battery at 30% over the CDR is not dangerous if you know what you're doing'.... and similar words of wisdom.
Perhaps you can relay that message to this mech user.
The problem with both devices is a human element dealing with a volatile battery if neglected.
The reason why I feel safer using a mech is because I trust my own brain more than I trust the vagueries of some Chinese chipmaker. Internal battery charging is what caused the mod in the example video to be turned into a scary fireball explosion in the middle of the night, which you claimed was not possible, when the reality is that the thing that's not possible is internal battery charging in a mech so yeah... "believe" is definitely the key word in that sentence...![]()
Generally speaking they can’t. Neither can vented mechs for that matter. It’s the unvented completely sealed devices that can go boom like hand grenades.There's a difference between knowing what you're doing and thinking you know what you're doing. The simple fact you didn't know regulated mods could explode speaks volumes of which part applies to you.
Where did I do that?The reason why I feel safer using a mech is because I trust my own brain more than I trust the vagueries of some Chinese chipmaker. Internal battery charging is what caused the mod in the example video to be turned into a scary fireball explosion in the middle of the night, which you claimed was not possible,
when the reality is that the thing that's not possible is internal battery charging in a mech so yeah... "believe" is definitely the key word in that sentence...![]()
I think the point is simply to help them die less often. Also since everyone is stupid some of the time it kind of applies to everyone.That's why I said what I said about the sharpness of potato knives. You can't fix stupid, therefore the whole idea that you can fix stupid by telling people to stay away from mechs is... well, stupid.
Also since everyone is stupid some of the time it kind of applies to everyone.
Did you mean this one? Not mine. It came from an ECF forum member's post. I used it in a new post on battery safety.I personally never charge batteries in a mod either, however, there are plenty of people that have had batteries pop/melt/etc. using external battery chargers. I think @Baditude is one of them, or he may have posted a pic from the internet. Also @LiquidDave had it happen as well. there may be more.