Calls to action are worthless. Where are the lawsuits? Surely some localities have included vaping prohibitions where smoking is not allowed. Why don't they pick one and file a lawsuit?
Amen to that!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Calls to action are worthless. Where are the lawsuits? Surely some localities have included vaping prohibitions where smoking is not allowed. Why don't they pick one and file a lawsuit?
There is power in numbers. Join CASAA to be counted. It is free. CASAA makes it very easy to respond to a Call For Action. Just a few clicks of the buttons. It is also interesting to read the type of response received from each politician.
Join Now!CASAA
Do any plants other than tobacco produce enough nicotine to be a viable alternative source? That would be a work-around to avoid looming taxation.
And this thread is to evade those taxes on e-liquid, is it not? I totally agree with you though. I have not read what legislation that the government is attempting to pass for e cigarettes. But if banning food flavoring is on their agenda, many large producers that use those products would not like that so it would not not happen. Unless of course, I am wrong in that flavoring in e cigarettes and in actual food are two seperate things.
Not if you're a corporate entity with a post office box/office outside the United States territories.No. This thread isn't about evading taxes. That's illegal.
If I'm correct alternatives have been ventured and found to be both too expensive and more dangerous.Equally, there is no point in trying to find an alternative alkaloid either.
Agreed! Perhaps that mentality would go over well in a country governed by a dictator. It doesn't fly here in the USA! We have rights. Period.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of course, if someone did legitimate research of the long term effects of vaping on the human lungs and body, that would for sure sway government opinion. And that means a lot of testing.
You can't argue 0-nic vaping, because it looks no different than vaping with nicotine. I am shocked an organization which claims to protect vaping hasn't challenged vaping prohibitions, other than on a forum, rather than in the courts...
Calls to action are worthless. Where are the lawsuits? Surely some localities have included vaping prohibitions where smoking is not allowed. Why don't they pick one and file a lawsuit?
I have not read what legislation that the government is attempting to pass for e cigarettes.
But if banning food flavoring is on their agenda, many large producers that use those products would not like that so it would not not happen.
Unless of course, I am wrong in that flavoring in e cigarettes and in actual food are two seperate things.
Correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't such a suit also require a party who had achieved standing by having violated such a ban?Law suits require money, I am sure that your check is in the mail.
Correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't such a suit also require a party who had achieved standing by having violated such a ban?
Correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't such a suit also require a party who had achieved standing by having violated such a ban?
They can't send a volunteer out to vape in a location which does not allow it, refuse when asked to stop, then file a lawsuit? Where are these die hard activists? Are they just bold on Internet forums? Maybe CASSA is just waiting for NJOY or BLU to actually do something, rather than just work people up on Internet forums and collect donations...
OK, then I'll go on record as being in for a four figure dollar amount should CASAA make a commitment to pursuing this route.True, but the issue of standing would not be addressed until after suit was filed with a complaint. The cost of preparation prior to even drafting the complaint can be very high. The value of a well drafted, well researched and prepared, complaint cannot be underestimated. Standing would be a necessary part of that preparation. A good lawyer's motto is that of a good Boy Scout; be prepared (the similarity ends right there). And, because whoever the plaintiff may be that plaintiff would be litigating the regulations of the federal government; the litigation budget of the USA is calculated with a printing press not a calculator. [musing cynically] A just cause is not the first prerequisite, money is. "Justice" may or may not follow.
OK, then I'll go on record as being in for a four figure dollar amount should CASAA make a commitment to pursuing this route.
I wonder if we should start a new thread, perhaps in the CASAA section of the forum?
It seems we are straying rather far off the original topic of "How to get around future e-cig taxes".
Correct me if I'm wrong, wouldn't such a suit also require a party who had achieved standing by having violated such a ban?
I've read through the bulk of this thread, and I just have a couple of ideas. First of all, there is power in numbers,but as has been the case in many areas, a lot of people want to talk, but nobody wants to get up off their .... and move.
Second, get off the grid.
Me, personally, as an adult who only wants to live and not bother anybody else, I've had my fill of government telling me what I can and cannot do. "Nuff said.