E-cigarettes spark debate - Fall River, MA - The Herald News
Check out the poll at the end of the story.
Check out the poll at the end of the story.
that right there is the best part of the article, in my opinion, for it reiterates the "on a case by case basis" bit, though I dont agree with their use of the term "adulterated".“FDA has reviewed several ‘electronic cigarettes’ and determined that those products were making ‘drug’ claims,” said Susan Small, a public affairs technician in the New England District FDA, in a written statement. “We have detained and refused several such products on the grounds that they were unapproved new drugs.”
The FDA considers e-cigarettes to be “adulterated devices” and is reviewing the products on a case-by-case basis, Small said.
There is no strong evidence that shows they improve ones chances of quitting, said Kate Rogers, state director for the American Cancer Society.
Take off the rose-colored glasses and read the reality in those ugly, ugly comments.
As Ronald Reagan would say, "There you go again." WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT QUITTING? These are not for quitting, are not sold for that and only a fool would advertise these for smoking cessation. They are for continuing use of nicotine in a far safer fashion than inhaling cigarette smoke. Dunces speaking for well-intentioned health organizations must come to understand that, even if they never accept it.
Those public comments, however, are what I've come to expect following news articles. We do not enjoy public support. Our e-cigs are seen as foolish toys by many eyes, a kind of adult pacifier for addicts without willpower. These people, like many health organizations, want us to quit or die. No other choice. Get out of our world, one way or another.
Take off the rose-colored glasses and read the reality in those ugly, ugly comments. Those are four out of every five voters, and a reason Congress will approve Waxman/Kennedy later this month. Sure, we can stack a poll, but the comments speak loudly.
This is exactly right TB,As Ronald Reagan would say, "There you go again." WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT QUITTING? These are not for quitting, are not sold for that and only a fool would advertise these for smoking cessation. They are for continuing use of nicotine in a far safer fashion than inhaling cigarette smoke. Dunces speaking for well-intentioned health organizations must come to understand that, even if they never accept it.
Those public comments, however, are what I've come to expect following news articles. We do not enjoy public support. Our e-cigs are seen as foolish toys by many eyes, a kind of adult pacifier for addicts without willpower. These people, like many health organizations, want us to quit or die. No other choice. Get out of our world, one way or another.
Take off the rose-colored glasses and read the reality in those ugly, ugly comments. Those are four out of every five voters, and a reason Congress will approve Waxman/Kennedy later this month. Sure, we can stack a poll, but the comments speak loudly.
You're right about the article, Lacey. It was fine. The comments? You still wear those glasses, don't you?
Glasses or not, I still love you! Fight on.
Do not just read the article read the comments at the bottom. The last one is right this is not just do we get to keep are nic habit it is to also keep are right to choices to have that habit... With big brother looking more and more over are shoulder even a small win like this would be nice (like SE and the FDA).
Take off the rose-colored glasses and read the reality in those ugly, ugly comments. Those are four out of every five voters, and a reason Congress will approve Waxman/Kennedy later this month. Sure, we can stack a poll, but the comments speak loudly.