This is just business. If someone advises me to buy something and I discover it's crap, I'll never take that person's buying advice again. But in general, I don't take advice from dudes rocking dookie ropes with PVs hanging off them.Strange. I haven't heard of a single case where someone was complaining that Vapor Joe forced them to buy something against their will.
Rhetoric much?
This is just business. If someone advises me to buy something and I discover it's crap, I'll never take that person's buying advice again. But in general, I don't take advice from dudes rocking dookie ropes with PVs hanging off them.
who can you trust? uhm..how about yourself to be able to make your own decisions? for pete's sake you aren't dating the man!I think the shift to some lower quality goods ties in to the site generating money from clicks. Promoting attractive prices generates clicks, which make money, regardless of quality. The quality of the product is implied by Joe's statements about how great it is on the website, with no user's comment capability.
If you can't trust an objective hobbyist making just a little bit every time you click a link, who can you trust?
Yes you do.. you just don't know it.I don't take advice from dudes rocking dookie ropes with PVs hanging off them.
This is just business. If someone advises me to buy something and I discover it's crap, I'll never take that person's buying advice again. But in general, I don't take advice from dudes rocking dookie ropes with PVs hanging off them.
I don't think you understood what I said. I have never seen fasttech in an advertising banner on this site. I am referring to links by users. If you post a link to a product on the fasttech site, this forum automatically adds a shareasale referral. That is not transparent. I have no problem with this site doing it (other than the fact that if I knew that I wouldn't have had to waste all of 30 seconds trying to remove what I thought was an accidental referral link I posted). This site has increased fasttech's ecig sales (which in turn has led to them carrying a wider variety of product) so I have no issues with this site pulling in compensation.The difference is that transparent advertising is always acceptable. No one is concerned that someone's making money. In fact, I should hope that ECF is compensated in some way when we click through what are clear advertisements and end up on the ad buyers' sites (I know I've clicked on the ProVari banner here before).
But this isn't that. This is the equivalent of an ECF member posting threads about GapingVapers.net every day in the guise of a typical forum member and then profiting when you click through to GapingVapers.net.
i still have never ever seen vaperjoe proclaim to be a consultant or take an advisory role...he posts DEALS
Fair enough. But as long as his dookie rope holds a PV he will always be my advisor.
This is just business. If someone advises me to buy something and I discover it's crap, I'll never take that person's buying advice again. But in general, I don't take advice from dudes rocking dookie ropes with PVs hanging off them.
Joe tells people this is a good price, he doesn't say this is outstanding quality, if people are selling scrap metal at $40 a tonne then a place selling it at $20 a tonne is a deal regardless of your need for scrap metal.
If the OP wants less FT bargains on VJ's site then he should let VJ know about some places selling the stuff cheaper, let him know about better deals available.
At some point FuManChu Vaping Co. will start undercutting FT and everyone will start complaining about them getting the coverage, I won't, I will be transferring my business to FuManChu Vaping Co.
A deal is a deal, it's up to the suppliers to earn the coverage.
I do sent him an email yesturday and said instead of those crappy fasttech vivi to put mtbakervapor.com evods, i know he read my email cuz he posted the evods
Sent from my iVap using Tapatalk HD
Well done, so why do you have an issue with him posting both deals?
How does it affect you or your wallet? Are you forced to buy Joe's deals? You don't have a choice? No! So the sense of entitlement to complain about something that in reality purely benefits the end-users at ZERO cost is ridiculous. I don't care if Joe is being paid in gold and Cambodian breast milk by vendors. It's usually a deal you get first from a vendor you would have never known about otherwise. You're not forced to do anything. Here's a no name product from a no name vendor that's being sold at this much through this link with this code. " hey,I was thinking about getting one of those and that's a great price" or "I have no interest" ... Either way I'm out nothing for somebody else doing the leg work of finding or setting up a good deal for me. How can I complain about that? If Joe's links give a vendor a surge of business then why shouldn't he get a cut? As long as I'm not paying for anything I have zero right to complain....So understanding that promoting yourself as an unbiased blog when in fact you are hosting paid-for promotions that are not marked as such, is a generational thing now? If so, prior generations were in fact wiser, as standards that mitigated what in the publishing world are known as "seeming improprieties" were far stricter. It's as simple as this: It's unethical if I tell you I'm an unbiased consumer such as yourself and am promoting product X out of personal interest, but am actually making a cut on it. Feel free to play along, there is nothing wrong in you knowing what's happening and hopping on board. But to attack others for daring to speak about it on a message board is absurd.