All of those mods are boxes...
Here's a thought as to why the P3 has a 20 watt limit: To accommodate silly little 18350 batteries. There isn't an 18350 made that's safe at 30 watts. Even the best 18490s are marginal at 30 watts. And the Provari fan base would be upset if they HAD to use nothing but 18650s..
Here's a thought as to why the P3 has a 20 watt limit: To accommodate silly little 18350 batteries. There isn't an 18350 made that's safe at 30 watts. Even the best 18490s are marginal at 30 watts. And the Provari fan base would be upset if they HAD to use nothing but 18650s..
Probably correct. Keeping the form factor (which is important) probably drove the 20W. Surprised they have not branched out to include a Provari box version. I'd be interested.
Excellent point, Rossum. My most used mod is a Mini Provari/KFL+ in 18350 mode. I actually asked Provape tech engineers about using the AW 18350 IMR in the Mini Provari. http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/provape/524874-question-tech-engineers-provape.htmlHere's a thought as to why the P3 has a 20 watt limit: To accommodate silly little 18350 batteries. There isn't an 18350 made that's safe at 30 watts. Even the best 18490s are marginal at 30 watts. And the Provari fan base would be upset if they HAD to use nothing but 18650s..
Baditude said:Referring to this thread Technical - Why High Drain Batteries? , the tech engineers state that the Provari needs a high drain battery which can supply up to 9 amps of power. The recommended AW 18650 IMR 2000 mAh battery has a 10 amp continuous discharge rate limit, so it passes this requirement. I've read conflicting information on the amp limit of the AW 18490 IMR 1100 mAh battery; some sources specify 16.8 amps, others say 8.4 amps - which is correct?
The recommended battery for the Mini Provari is the AW 18350 IMR 700 mAh battery. It only has a 6 amp continuous discharge rate. How is the Mini Provari able to achieve optimal performance with this limitation of amps? Am I missing something?
Provape said:Hey Bad. Sorry for the delay, but it is finally here .... .and long
There are four (4) aspects of the battery and its use that need to be understood and factored in for this discussion. They are:
1) The maximum continuous discharge rate specification of the cell
2) The internal resistance of the cell
3) The application of the cell
4) The cell lithium ion chemistry
The cell ratings are based on a continuous discharge. The application is intermittent duty, by its nature not continuous, so a cell can be intermittently be pushed somewhat harder than its continuous rating in this type of application. The Provari when supplying its maximum output power (14.5 Watts) will need to draw a maximum average current from the cell of 5.2 amps. While it is true that the pulse current can be as high as 9 amps, the duration of these pulse currents is less than 10 microseconds and is not as important as the total average current drawn.
The 5.2 amps is when the cell is at end of charge and the output is adjusted to maximum power out, so it is an absolute worst case situation.
This situation is important because any manufacturer of a high quality device needs to account for the worst case conditions his product will be exposed to in its application.
When compared to the 6 amp continuous rating of the AW18350 cell it passes with some acceptable margin. The AW18490 and AW18650 have even better margins.
BUT just as important, is the safer lithium ion chemistry and very low internal resistance of the AW cells. Other lithium-ion chemistry and higher internal resistance cells will not perform to the level of the AW cells and therefore reduce the overall experience when used. The cost of these other cells when comparing their performance and safety are just not worth it.
There are cells that claim to have the same or better capacity as the AW cell BUT their internal resistance is inferior. If the cell has a higher internal resistance it will drop more voltage when current is taken out and as a result the ProVari will indicate it is at end of charge when it could have a significant amount of capacity remaining.
What good is this capacity if it cannot be utilized by the ProVari? It is of NO use, so why use it?
We will ONLY recommend cells that our engineering tests show will allow the ProVari to perform at its best.
Excellent point, Rossum. My most used mod is a Mini Provari/KFL+ in 18350 mode. I actually asked Provape tech engineers about using the AW 18350 IMR in the Mini Provari. http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/provape/524874-question-tech-engineers-provape.html
I don't think there is another regulated tube mod made in the US.
Well there WAS the Futura.
The Protovapor XPV's form-factor is closer to a square tube than a box.
And Zen's ZNA isn't exactly a box either.
Buzz pro is still available?
Me TOO!!!
Love my box mods.
My vaping buddy has a Buzz Pro (loves it). Uses a KFL+ on it. He told me it would soon be discontinued. I don't know his sources, but since he follows the line, I assumed he knew what he was talking about.Buzz pro is still available?
I wanted a Buzz Pro so desperately when I started vaping, wasn't it the first VV device?
In terms of power? Sub ohmers seem to prefer $15 PRC mechs...
I would be very interested in finding out the average age of ProVari owners and how long they have vaped and whether or not they were previous smokers. My guess is older than the median vapers' age, has vaped longer and is a former smoker. If I owned a company which made mods, my target would be vapers in their 30's to 50's, who have vaped more than 6 months and who were former smokers. They have disposable income, have tried other devices and vape to keep off of cigarettes. The P3 would more than meet the needs of these vapers...
Wouldn't you consider DNA regulated, or no? At least upwardly, but it's still regulation.
I think.